Skip to main content
Log in

Appendectomy in Germany—an analysis of a nationwide survey 2011/2012

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 22 September 2013

Abstract

Introduction

Although appendectomies are frequently performed and new procedural techniques have emerged, no nationwide analysis exists after the cessation of the German quality control in 2004.

Methods

One thousand eight hundred seventy surgical hospitals in Germany were asked to answer questions anonymously concerning the size of the department, applied procedural techniques, various technical details, as well as the approach to the intraoperative finding of an inconspicuous appendix.

Results

We received 643 questionnaires (34.4 %) for evaluation. Almost all hospitals (95.5 %) offer laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), 15.4 % offer single-port (SPA), and 2.2 % (hybrid-) NOTES technique (NA). LA is the standard procedure in 85.2 % of male and in 89.1 % for female patients. In an open procedure (OA), the appendix and mesoappendix are mostly ligated (93.8 and 91.5 %). A Veress needle and open access are employed equally for LA. In 66.6 % of LA, the appendix is divided using an Endo-GIA, the mesoappendix in 45.5 % with bipolar coagulation. Almost half of the hospitals routinely flush the site in OA and LA. In open surgery with an inconspicuous appendix but a pathological finding elsewhere in the abdomen, it is resected “en principe” in 64.7 % and in the absence of any pathological finding in 91.2 %. For laparoscopic procedures, the numbers are 54.8 and 88.4 %.

Conclusions

Most German hospitals perform appendectomies laparoscopically regardless of patients’ gender. Usage of an Endo-GIA is widely established. SPA has not gained much acceptance, nor is NA widely used yet. In the absence of any pathological findings in particular, the macroscopically inconspicuous appendix results in an appendectomy “en principe” in most German hospitals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilms IM, de Hoog DE, de Visser DC, Janzing HM (2011) Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD008359. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Statistisches_Bundesamt (2011) Operationen und Prozeduren der vollstationären Patientinnen und Patienten der Krankenhäuser. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Gesundheit/Krankenhaeuser/OperationenProzeduren5231401107014.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. Accessed 22 Mar 2012

  3. Semm K (1983) Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 15(2):59–64. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1021466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. BQS BfQtg (2004) Bundesauswertung 6.0 2003 Modul 12/2: Appendektomie. http://www.bqs-outcome.de/2003/ergebnisse/leistungsbereiche/appendektomie/buaw60/Download%206.0. Accessed 22 Mar 2012

  5. Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (10):CD001546. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub3

  6. Chu T, Chandhoke RA, Smith PC, Schwaitzberg SD (2011) The impact of surgeon choice on the cost of performing laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 25(4):1187–1191. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1342-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaitan HG, Reveiz L, Farquhar C (2011) Laparoscopy for the management of acute lower abdominal pain in women of childbearing age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD007683. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007683.pub2

  8. Garbarino S, Shimi SM (2009) Routine diagnostic laparoscopy reduces the rate of unnecessary appendicectomies in young women. Surg Endosc 23(3):527–533. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-9855-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Partecke LI, von Bernstorff W, Karrasch A, Cziupka K, Glitsch A, Stier A, Heidecke CD, Tepel J (2010) Unexpected findings on laparoscopy for suspected acute appendicitis: a pro for laparoscopic appendectomy as the standard procedure for acute appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395(8):1069–1076. doi:10.1007/s00423-009-0567-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Corneille MG, Gallup TM, Bening T, Wolf SE, Brougher C, Myers JG, Dent DL, Medrano G, Xenakis E, Stewart RM (2010) The use of laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy: evaluation of safety and efficacy. Am J Surg 200(3):363–367. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.09.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wei B, Qi CL, Chen TF, Zheng ZH, Huang JL, Hu BG, Wei HB (2011) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 25(4):1199–1208. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1344-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clarke T, Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Cheng BC, Olasky J, Sohn HJ, Moazzez A, Algra J, Chaghouri E, Berne TV (2011) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the obese patient: a subset analysis from a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Surg Endosc 25(4):1276–1280. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1359-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sauerland S, Agresta F, Bergamaschi R, Borzellino G, Budzynski A, Champault G, Fingerhut A, Isla A, Johansson M, Lundorff P, Navez B, Saad S, Neugebauer EA (2006) Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 20(1):14–29. doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0564-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Korndorffer JR Jr, Fellinger E, Reed W (2010) SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 24(4):757–761. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0632-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sahm M, Koch A, Schmidt U, Wolff S, Pross M, Gastinger I, Lippert H (2012) Acute appendicitis—Clinical Health-Service Research on the Current Surgical Therapy. Zentralbl Chir. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1283947

  16. Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Pritts TA, Ko CY, Esposito TJ (2010) Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals. Surgery 148(4):625–635. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025, discussion 635-627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brugger L, Rosella L, Candinas D, Guller U (2011) Improving outcomes after laparoscopic appendectomy: a population-based, 12-year trend analysis of 7446 patients. Ann Surg 253(2):309–313. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fc9d53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sporn E, Petroski GF, Mancini GJ, Astudillo JA, Miedema BW, Thaler K (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy—is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005. J Am Coll Surg 208(2):179–185 e172. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Faiz O, Clark J, Brown T, Bottle A, Antoniou A, Farrands P, Darzi A, Aylin P (2008) Traditional and laparoscopic appendectomy in adults: outcomes in English NHS hospitals between 1996 and 2006. Ann Surg 248(5):800–806. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818b770c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D (2011) Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Ann Surg 254(6):927–932. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822aa8ea

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Sugiyama K, Fukunaga M (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. World J Surg 33(2):208–214. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9843-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A, Gellert K, Zornig C, Burghardt J, Busing M, Runkel N, Kohlhaw K, Albrecht R, Kirchner TG, Arlt G, Mall JW, Butters M, Bulian DR, Bretschneider J, Holmer C, Buhr HJ (2010) The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg 252(2):263–270. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e6240f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Begin GF (1993) Appendectomy in children by simple port laparoscopy. Chir Endosc 2:6–9

    Google Scholar 

  24. D’Alessio A, Piro E, Tadini B, Beretta F (2002) One-trocar transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children: our experience. Eur J Pediatr Surg 12(1):24–27. doi:10.1055/s-2002-25096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Meyer A, Preuss M, Roesler S, Lainka M, Omlor G (2004) Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted “one-trocar” appendectomy—TULAA—as an alternative operation method in the treatment of appendicitis. Zentralbl Chir 129(5):391–395. doi:10.1055/s-2004-820388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rehman H, Rao AM, Ahmed I (2011) Single incision versus conventional multi-incision appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (7):CD009022. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009022.pub2

  27. Cho MS, Min BS, Hong YK, Lee WJ (2011) Single-site versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison of short-term operative outcomes. Surg Endosc 25(1):36–40. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1124-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Prasad M (2008) Transvaginal endoscopic appendectomy in humans: a unique approach to NOTES—world’s first report. Surg Endosc 22(5):1343–1347. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-9811-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bernhardt J, Gerber B, Schober HC, Kahler G, Ludwig K (2008) NOTES—case report of a unidirectional flexible appendectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23(5):547–550. doi:10.1007/s00384-007-0427-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pelosi MA 3rd, Pelosi MA (1996) Vaginal appendectomy at laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a surgical option. J Laparoendosc Surg 6(6):399–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ghezzi F, Raio L, Mueller MD, Franchi M (2003) Laparoscopic appendectomy: a gynecological approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13(4):257–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Park PO, Bergstrom M (2010) Transgastric peritoneoscopy and appendectomy: thoughts on our first experience in humans. Endoscopy 42(1):81–84. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1243795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang MT, Wei PL, Wu CC, Lai IR, Chen RJ, Lee WJ (2001) Needlescopic, laparoscopic, and open appendectomy: a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11(5):306–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lau DH, Yau KK, Chung CC, Leung FC, Tai YP, Li MK (2005) Comparison of needlescopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 15(2):75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK (2005) Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD001439. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001439.pub2

  36. Gorecki WJ, Grochowski JA (2001) Are antibiotics necessary in nonperforated appendicitis in children? A double blind randomized controlled trial. Med Sci Monit 7(2):289–292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ahmad G, O’Flynn H, Duffy JM, Phillips K, Watson A (2012) Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD006583. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub3

  38. Kazemier G, In't Hof KH, Saad S, Bonjer HJ, Sauerland S (2006) Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling? Surg Endosc 20(9):1473–1476. doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0525-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Beldi G, Vorburger SA, Bruegger LE, Kocher T, Inderbitzin D, Candinas D (2006) Analysis of stapling versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Br J Surg 93(11):1390–1393. doi:10.1002/bjs.5474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sahm M, Kube R, Schmidt S, Ritter C, Pross M, Lippert H (2011) Current analysis of endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Surg Endosc 25(1):124–129. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1144-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Delibegovic S, Matovic E (2009) Hem-o-lok plastic clips in securing of the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 23(12):2851–2854. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0493-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Alis H, Gonenc M, Deniztas C, Kapan S, Turhan AN (2012) Metal endoclips for the closure of the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy. Tech Coloproctol 16(2):139–141. doi:10.1007/s10151-011-0764-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Rickert A, Bonninghoff R, Post S, Walz M, Runkel N, Kienle P (2012) Appendix stump closure with titanium clips in laparoscopic appendectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(2):327–331. doi:10.1007/s00423-011-0869-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vettoretto N, Agresta F (2011) A brief review of laparoscopic appendectomy: the issues and the evidence. Tech Coloproctol 15(1):1–6. doi:10.1007/s10151-010-0656-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V, Clavien PA (2004) Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg 240(6):1074–1084, discussion 1084-1075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pauniaho SL, Lahdes-Vasama T, Helminen MT, Iber T, Makela E, Pajulo O (2010) Non-absorbable interrupted versus absorbable continuous skin closure in pediatric appendectomies. Scand J Surg 99(3):142–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Grunewald B, Keating J (1993) Should the ‘normal’ appendix be removed at operation for appendicitis? J R Coll Surg Edinb 38(3):158–160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Chiarugi M, Buccianti P, Decanini L, Balestri R, Lorenzetti L, Franceschi M, Cavina E (2001) “What you see is not what you get”. A plea to remove a ‘normal’ appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy. Acta Chir Belg 101(5):243–245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Phillips AW, Jones AE, Sargen K (2009) Should the macroscopically normal appendix be removed during laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain when no other explanatory pathology is found? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(5):392–394. doi:10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181b71957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. van den Broek WT, Bijnen AB, de Ruiter P, Gouma DJ (2001) A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg 88(2):251–254. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01668.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Mrs. Christina Wagner of the Institute for Communication, University of Witten/Herdecke for proofreading of the manuscript.

Disclosures

Drs. Dirk Rolf Bulian, Jürgen Knuth, Axel Sauerwald, Michael Ströhlein, Jörg Ansorg, and Markus Maria Heiss have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Rolf Bulian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bulian, D.R., Knuth, J., Sauerwald, A. et al. Appendectomy in Germany—an analysis of a nationwide survey 2011/2012. Int J Colorectal Dis 28, 127–138 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1573-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1573-9

Keywords

Navigation