Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Single-stage correction of imperforate anus with a rectourethral or a rectovestibula fistula by semi-posterior sagittal anorectoplasty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical advantages of a single-stage correction of imperforate anus with a rectourethral or a rectovestibula fistula in neonates by a semi-posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP). The medical records of 38 neonates (5 females and 33 males) who had imperforate anus with a rectourethral or a rectovestibula fistula were reviewed and analyzed in Children’s Hospital of Fudan University between January 2004 and July 2007. All patients had an anorectal malformation but without obvious sacral dysplasia. The first group had a single-stage PSARP without a colostomy. All neonates were full-term without severe cardiac, renal anomalies or severe abdominal distension. The second group had a staged Peña procedure; the neonates were not suitable for a single-stage PSARP because of severe abdominal distention or cardiac, renal anomalies. A transverse colostomy was performed, followed 3–6 months later by the Peña procedure, and colostomy closure 2 months thereafter. The congenital anomalies, fetal age, birth weight, time and age of the definitive operation, complications, length of hospital stay, cost, and postoperative bowel movements were analyzed between these two groups. Among the 38 patients, 22 had a single-stage definitive operation and 16 had a staged pull-through procedure. There were significant differences in congenital anomalies between the two groups (P = 0.0314), but no statistically significant differences between the fetal ages, weight at birth, and time and age at the time of the definitive operation (P > 0.05). One patient in the first group had intestinal obstruction and intestinal perforation. For the second group, early complications were related to the colostomy. At after 3 years postoperatively, 9 patients in the first group and 12 patients in the second group were followed-up and all had positive voluntary bowel movements. There were no statistically significant differences in soiling and constipation grades between the two groups. The total length of hospital stay was 12.06 ± 0.85 and 33.85 ± 0.94 days and the cost was 10,681.1 ± 1,759.5 and 27,355.9 ± 1,952.0 RMB for the first and second groups, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the total length of hospital stay and cost between the two groups (P < 0.0001); however, there were no statistically significant differences in the length of hospital stay and cost during the definitive operation between the two groups (P > 0.05). This retrospective study shows that it is feasible for correction of imperforate anus with a rectourethral or a rectovestibula fistula in neonates using a modified PSARP without a colostomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albanese CT, Jennings RW, Lopoo JB, Bratton BJ, Harrison MR (1999) One-stage correction of high imperforate anus in the male neonate. J Pediatr Surg 34:834–836

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Adeniran JO (2002) One-stage correction of imperforate anus and rectovestibular fistula in girls: preliminary results. J Pediatr Surg 37:16–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adeniran JO, Abdur-Rahman L (2005) One-stage correction of intermediate imperforate anus in males. Pediatr Surg Int 21:88–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goergeson KE, Inge TH, Albanese CT (2000) Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus—a new technique. J Pediatr Surg 35:927–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Iwanaka T, Arai M, Kawashima H, Kudou S, Fujishiro J, Matsui A, Imaizumi S (2003) Findings of pelvic musculature and efficacy of laparoscopic muscle stimulator in laparoscopy-assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus. Surg Endosc 17:278–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lima M, Tursini S, Ruggeri G, Aquino A, Gargano T, De Biagi L, Ahmed A, Gentili A (2006) Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus: 3 years experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:63–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen CJ (1999) The treatment of imperforate anus: experience with 108 patients. J Pediatr Surg 34:1728–1732

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Holschneider AM, Jesch NK, Stragholz E, Pfrommer W (2002) Surgical methods for anorectal malformation from Rebein to Peña. Critical assessment of score systems and proposal for a new classification. Eur J Pediatr Surg 12:73–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rintala RJ, Lindahl HG (1999) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty is superior to sacroperineal-sacroabdominoperineal pullthrough: a long-term follow-up study in boys with high anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 34:334–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Holschneider A, Huston J, Peña A, Bekhit E (2005) Preliminary report on the international conference for the development of standards for the treatment of anarectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 40:1521–1526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Long L, Qizhi Y, Liumin H, Gang L, Lie Y, Jun J, Baofu L, Shuqing W, Ping W (2003) One-stage correction of high imperforate anus with laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty. Chin J Minim Invasive Surg 3:199–201

    Google Scholar 

  12. Long L, Jing-bo F, Qi-zhi Y, Liumin H, Gang L, Lie Y, Jun J, Baofu L, Shuqing W, Ping W (2004) Laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty for high imperforate anus. Chin J Pediatr Surg 25:420–422

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kudou S, Iwanaka T, Kawashima H, Uchida H, Nishi A, Yotsumoto K, Kaneko M (2005) Midterm follow-up study of high-type imperforate anus after laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg 40:1923–1926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Iwanaka T, Uchida H, Kawashima H, Nishi A, Kudou S, Satake R (2004) Complications of laparoscopic surgery in neonates and small infants. J Pediatr Surg 39:1838–1841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Peña A, De Vries P (1982) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications. J Pediatr Surg 17:796–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. De Vries P, Peña A (1982) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg 17:638–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peña A (1995) Anorectal malformation. Semin Pediatr Surg 4:35–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pakarinen MP, Baillie C, Koivusalo A, et al (2006) Transanal endoscopic-assisted proctoplasty—a novel surgical approach for individual management of patients with imperforate anus without fistula. J Pediatr Surg 41:314–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cahill JL, Christie DL (1985) Results after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: a new approach to high imperforate anus. Am J Surg 149:629–631

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shan Zheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, S., Xiao, X. & Huang, Y. Single-stage correction of imperforate anus with a rectourethral or a rectovestibula fistula by semi-posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. Pediatr Surg Int 24, 671–676 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-008-2154-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-008-2154-4

Keywords

Navigation