Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A phase-space consideration of changing climate-PDF

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on a single-model 100-member ensemble of climate change simulations performed with the MPI-ESM, this paper investigates how the probability density function (PDF) of atmospheric general circulation (AGC)—a marginal distribution of the full climate PDF—responds to increasing \({\hbox {CO}}_2\) concentration. The investigation provides a first assessment of \({\hbox {CO}}_2\)-induced changes in AGC-PDF derived from ensemble statistics (as oppose to time statistics in usual practice) that arise solely from internal variability consistent with the imposed \({\hbox {CO}}_2\)-forcing. By focusing on the first two moments of the AGC-PDF related to the Hadley circulation and the subtropical jets, we find that the major \({\hbox {CO}}_2\)-induced changes in the PDF are related to structure changes in the mean circulation and in the circulation variability. As \({\hbox {CO}}_2\) concentration increases, different components of the AGC can co-evolve with changing forcing. In particular, the mean Hadley cell co-evolves with the mean subtropical jets. The co-evolution is characterized by the concurrent Hadley cell widening and poleward shifting of the subtropical jets (particularly strong in January), by a strengthening of both the Hadley cell and the subtropical jets in October, and by a weakening of the Hadley cell and a strengthening of the northern and southern jets in January. The changes in circulation variability are more subtle, and reveal only large and spatially coherent changes in places, where the variability is already strong without increasing \({\hbox {CO}}_2\) concentration, such as at the northern and southern flanks of the summer southern subtropical jet, and at the northern flank of the southern polar night jet. There are some significant cross-variabilities between different components of the AGC. Overall, the \({\hbox {CO}}_2\)-induced AGC-changes can be described by linear trends in the first and second moments, with the trends in the means being much stronger than those in the variances and co-variances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam O, Grise KM, Staten P, Simpson IR, Davis SM, Davis NA, Waugh DW, Birner T, Ming A (2018) The tropd software package (v1): standardized methods for calculating tropical-width diagnostics. Geosci Model Dev 11:4339–4357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes EA, Polvani L (2013) Response of the midlatitude jets, and of their variability, to increased greenhouse gases in the cmip5 models. J Clim 26(18):7117–7135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson L, Hodges KI, Keenlyside N (2009) Will extratropical storms intensify in a warmer climate? J Clim 22(9):2276–2301. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2678.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang EKM, Guo Y, Xia X, Zheng M (2013) Storm-track activity in ipcc ar4/cmip3 model simulations. J Clim 26(1):246–260. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00707.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins M et al (2013) Long-term climate change: Projections, commitments and irreversibility. In: Stocker T, Qin D, Plattner G, Tignor M, Allen S, Boschung J, Nauel A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley P (eds) Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovennebtal panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York

  • Davis N, Birner T (2017) On the discrepancies in tropical belt expansion between reanalyses and climate models and among tropical belt width metrics. J Clim 30(4):1211–1231. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0371.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel KA (2013) Downscaling cmip5 climate models shows increased tropical cyclone activity over the 21st century. Proc Nat Acad Sci 110(30):12219–12224. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301293110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gastineau G, Soden BJ (2009) Model projected changes of extreme wind events in response to global warming. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey BJ, Shaffrey LC, Woollings TJ, Zappa G, Hodges KI (2012) How large are projected 21st century storm track changes? Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselmann K (1976) Stochastic climate models. Part I Theory Tellus 6:473–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins E, Sutton R (2009) The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictiona. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90(8):1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedemann C, Mauritsen T, Jungclaus J, Marotzke J (2017) The subtle origins of surface-warming hiatuses. Nat Clim Change 7:336–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Fu Q (2007) Observed poleward expansion of the hadley circulation since 1979. Atmos Chem Phys 7:5229–5236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC AR5 (2013) Contribution of working group i to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Stocker T, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen S, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley P (eds) The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, p 1535

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungclaus JH, Fischer N, Haak H, Lohmann K, Marotzke J, Matei D, Mikolajewicz U, Notz D, Storch JS (2013) Characteristics of the ocean simulations in the Max Planck Institute Ocean Model (MPIOM) the ocean component of the MPI-Earth system model. J Adv Model Earth Syst 5:422–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson TR, Sirutis JJ, Vecchi GA, Garner S, Zhao M, Kim H-S, Bender M, Tuleya RE, Held IM, Villarini G (2013) Dynamical downscaling projections of twenty-first-century atlantic hurricane activity: Cmip3 and cmip5 model-based scenarios. J Clim 26(17):6591–6617. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00539.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau WKM, Kim K-M (2015) Robust hadley circulation changes and increasing global dryness due to \({\rm CO}_2\) warming from cmip5 model projections. Natl Acad Sci 112(12):3630–3635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz EN (1963) Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci 20(2):130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Vecchi G, Reichler T (2007) Expansion of the Hadley cell under global warming. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizuta R (2012) Intensification of extratropical cyclones associated with the polar jet change in the cmip5 global warming projections. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen H, Lucas C, Evans A, Timbal B (2015) Expansion of the southern hemisphere hadley cell in response to greenhouse gas forcing. J Clim 28(20):8067–8077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo K-H, Frierson DMW, Son J-H (2014) A mechanism for future changes in hadley circulation strength in cmip5 climate change simulations. Geophys Res Lett 41(14):5251–5258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson IR, Shaw TA, Seager R (2014) A diagnosis of the seasonally and longitudinally varying midlatitude circulation response to global warming. J Atmos Sci 71(7):2489–2515. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0325.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon A, Polvani LM, Waugh D, Davis S (2016) Contrasting upper and lower atmospheric metrics of tropical expansion in the southern hemisphere. Geophys Res Lett 43(19):10,496–10,503. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens B, Giorgetta M, Esch M, Mauritsen T, Crueger T, Rast S, Salzmann M, Schmidt H, Bader J, Block K, Brokopf R, Fast I, Kinne S, Kornblueh L, Lohmann U, Pincus R, Reichler T, Roeckner E (2013) Atmospheric component of the mpi-m earth system model: Echam6. J Adv Model Earth Syst 5(2):146–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su H, Jiang JH, Zhai C, Shen TJ, Neelin JD, Stephens GL, Yung YL (2014) Weakening and strengthening structures in the hadley circulation change under global warming and implications for cloud response and climate sensitivity. J Geophys Res Atmos 119(10):5787–5805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao L, Hu Y, Liu J (2016) Anthropogenic forcing on the hadley circulation in cmip5 simulations. Clim Dyn 46(9):3337–3350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallis GK, Zurita-Gotor P, Cairns C, Kidston J (2014) Response of the large-scale structure of the atmosphere to global warming. Q J R Meteorol Soc 141(690):1479–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villarini G, Vecchi GA (2013) Projected increases in north atlantic tropical cyclone intensity from cmip5 models. J Clim 26(10):3231–3240. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00441.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Storch H, Zwiers Francis W (1999) Statistical analysis in climate research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612336

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waugh D, Grise K, Seviour J, Davis S, Adam O, Son S-W, Simpson I, Staten P, Maycock A, Ummenhofer C, Birner T, Ming A (2018) Revisiting the relationship among metrics of tropical expansion. J Clim 31:7565–7581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zappa G, Shaffrey LC, Hodges KI, Sansom PG, Stephenson DB (2013) A multimodel assessment of future projections of north atlantic and european extratropical cyclones in the cmip5 climate models. J Clim 26(16):5846–5862. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00573.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Jochem Marotzke and Elisa Manzini for their comments. Thanks also to the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. The primary data and scripts used in the analysis that may be useful in reproducing the authors’ work are archived by the Max Planck Institute for meteorology and can be obtained from http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-FDC1-6.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucas Reimann.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Changes in ensemble means and ensemble variances in physical space

The purpose of this appendix is to provide an overview of changes in physical space, regarding both the ensemble mean and the ensemble variability of the AGC and as described by the ensemble mean and ensemble variance of meridional mass stream function and of zonal velocity. Both meridional-height sections of mass stream function and zonal mean zonal wind and horizontal maps of zonal velocity are shown. To describe the changes of the mean and the variability with increasing \({\hbox {CO}}_2\) concentration, the mean and variability at the beginning and the end of the simulation, corresponding to the pre-industrial time and the \({\hbox {4xCO}}_2\)-time, are considered. We included also the absolute trends (instead of t values) of ensemble statistics of circulation indices in Tables 6, 7, 8 (Figs. 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21).

Table 6 Linear trends in ensemble mean time series of \(S_{HC}\) (Tg/s per decade), \(S_{Jn}\) and \(S_{Js}\) (m/s per decade), \(W_{HC}\) , \(P_{Jn}\) , and \(P_{Js}\) (deg per decade) for January, April, July and October shown in Fig. 9
Table 7 Linear trends in ensemble standard deviation time series of \(S_{HC}\) (Tg/s per decade), \(S_{Jn}\) and \(S_{Js}\) (m/s per decade), \(W_{HC}\) , \(P_{Jn}\) , and \(P_{Js}\) (deg per decade) for January, April, July and October shown in Fig. 10
Table 8 Linear trends (change per 150 years) in ensemble correlation time series
Fig. 16
figure 16

Ensemble-means of zonal-mean meridional mass stream function at pre-industrial time (color shadings) and at \(4 \times \mathrm{CO}_2\)-time (black contours) in a January, b April, c July and d October. The scale of black contours corresponds to that of color shadings. The black dotted lines at 500 hPa denote the height, at which Hadley circulation strength \(S_{HC}\) and width \(W_{HC}\) are determined. Unit is 10 Tg/s

Fig. 17
figure 17

Ensemble-means of zonal-mean zonal wind at pre-industrial time (color shadings) and at \(4 \times \mathrm{CO}_2\)-time (black contours) in a January, b April, c July, and d October. The scale of black contours corresponds to that of shaded contours. Unit is m/s

Fig. 18
figure 18

Same as Fig. 17, but extending to the upper stratosphere at 1 hPa

Fig. 19
figure 19

Ensemble-means of 2-dimensional zonal wind at 200 hPa at pre-industrial time (color shadings) and at \(4 \times \mathrm{CO}_2\)-time (black contours) in a January and b July. The scale of black contours corresponds to that of color shadings. Unit is m/s. Stippled zonal bands mark areas of the westerlies at 200 hPa. Zonal anomalies within these bands are considered in Fig. 13

Fig. 20
figure 20

Difference in ensemble variance of 200-hPa zonal wind between the \(4 \times \mathrm{CO}_2\)- and the pre-industrial time (\(4 \times \mathrm{CO}_2\) minus pre-industrial time, color shadings), and the ensemble mean of 200-hPa zonal wind in pre-industrial time (black contours), for a January, and b July. Contour interval is 12 m/s

Fig. 21
figure 21

Difference in ensemble variance of 1-hPa zonal wind between the \(4 \times \mathrm{CO}_2\)- and the pre-industrial time (\(4 \times \mathrm{CO}_2\) minus pre-industrial time, color shadings), and the ensemble mean of 200-hPa zonal wind in pre-industrial time (black contours), for a January, and b July. Contour interval is 12 m/s

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reimann, L., von Storch, JS. A phase-space consideration of changing climate-PDF. Clim Dyn 54, 2633–2662 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05130-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05130-8

Keywords

Navigation