Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of global warming on the geobotanic zones: an experiment with a statistical–dynamical climate model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a zonally-averaged statistical climate model (SDM) is used to investigate the impact of global warming on the distribution of the geobotanic zones over the globe. The model includes a parameterization of the biogeophysical feedback mechanism that links the state of surface to the atmosphere (a bidirectional interaction between vegetation and climate). In the control experiment (simulation of the present-day climate) the geobotanic state is well simulated by the model, so that the distribution of the geobotanic zones over the globe shows a very good agreement with the observed ones. The impact of global warming on the distribution of the geobotanic zones is investigated considering the increase of CO2 concentration for the B1, A2 and A1FI scenarios. The results showed that the geobotanic zones over the entire earth can be modified in future due to global warming. Expansion of subtropical desert and semi-desert zones in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, retreat of glaciers and sea-ice, with the Arctic region being particularly affected and a reduction of the tropical rainforest and boreal forest can occur due to the increase of the greenhouse gases concentration. The effects were more pronounced in the A1FI and A2 scenarios compared with the B1 scenario. The SDM results confirm IPCC AR4 projections of future climate and are consistent with simulations of more complex GCMs, reinforcing the necessity of the mitigation of climate change associated to global warming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adem J (1962) On the theory of the general circulation of the atmosphere. Tellus 14:102–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler RF, Huffman GJ, Chang A, Ferraro R, Xie P, Janowiak J, Rudolf B, Schneider U, Curtis S, Bolvin D, Gruber A, Susskind J, Arkin P (2003) The version 2 global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979–Present). J Hydrometeor 4:1147–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts RA, Cox PM, Collins M, Harris PP, Huntingford C, Jones CD (2004) The role of ecosystem–atmosphere interactions in simulated Amazonian precipitation decrease and forest dieback under global climate warming. Theor Appl Climatol 78:157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budyko MI (1974) Climate and life. Academic Press, London, p 508

    Google Scholar 

  • Budyko MI (1978) Balancing the global heat budget. In: Gribbin J (ed) Climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 85–113

  • Campbell GC, Vonder Haar TH (1980), Climatology of radiation budget measurements from satellite, Atmos Sci Pap 323. Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo, 74 pp,

  • Chen T-C, Yoon J-h, Croix St, Takle ES (2001) Supressing impacts of the Amazonian deforestation by global circulation change. Bull Am Meteor Soc 82:2209–2216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox PM, Betts RA, Jones CD, Spall SA, Totterdell IJ (2000) Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408:184–187. doi:10.1038/35041539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox PM, Betts RA, Collins M, Harris PP, Huntingford C, Jones CD (2004) Amazonian forest dieback under climate-carbon cycle projections for the 21st century. Theor Appl Climatol 78:137–156. doi:10.1007/s00704-004-0049-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Levis S, Pollard D, Sitch S, Haxeltine A (1996) An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamics. Global Biogeochem Cycles 10:603–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franchito SH, Rao VB (1992) Climatic change due to land surface alterations. Clim Change 22:1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franchito SH, Rao VB, Silva RR (1998) A parameterization of radiative fluxes suitable for use in a statistical-dynamical model. Meteorol Atmos Phys 69:23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gash JHC, Nobre CA (1997) Climatic effects of Amazonian deforestation: Some results from ABRACOS. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78:823–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedney N, Valdes PJ (2000) The effect of Amazonian deforestation on the northern hemisphere circulation and climate. Geophys Res Lett 27:3053–3056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutman G (1984) Numerical experiments on land surface alterationswith a zonal model allowing for interaction between the geobotanic state and climate. J Atmos Sci 41:2679–2685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutman G, Ohring G, Joseph JH (1984) Interaction between the geobotanic state and climate: a suggested approach and a test with a zonal model. J Atmos Sci 41:2663–2678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Solomon S, et al. Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 996 pp.

  • Jentsch V (1991) An energy balance climate model with hydrological cycle. 1. Model description and sensitivity to internal parameters. J Geophys Res 96(D9):16169–17179

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalnay E et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40 year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacis A, Hanssen JA (1974) A parameterization for the absortion of solar radiation in the earth’s atmosphere. J Atmos Sci 31:118–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lean JL, Rind DH (2008) How natural and anthropogenic influences alter global and regional surface temperatures: 1889 to 2006. Geophys Res Lett 35:L18701. doi:10.1029/2008GL034864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lean J, Rowntree PR (1997) Understanding the sensitivity of a GCM simulation of Amazonian deforestation to the specification of vegetation and soil characteristics. J Clim 10:1216–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Fu R, Dickinson RE (2006) Rainfall and its seasonality over the Amazon in the 21st century as assessed by the coupled models for the IPCC AR4. J Geophys Res 111:D02111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein AT, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao Z (2007) Global climate projections. In: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 747–845

  • Moraes EC, Franchito SH, Rao VB (2004) Effects of biomass burning in Amazonia on climate: a numerical experiment with a statistical–dynamical model. J Geophys Res 109:D05109. doi:10.1029/2003JD003800,1-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraes EC, Franchito SH, Rao VB (2005) Evaluation of surface air temperature change due to the greenhouse gases increase with a statistical–dynamical model. J Geophys Res 110:D24109. doi:10.1029/2004JD005679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilson RP (1995) A model for predicting continental-scale vegetation distribution and water balance. Ecol Appl 5:362–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre CA, Sellers PJ, Shukla J (1991) Amazonian deforestation and regional climate change. J Clim 4:957–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre CA, Oliveira GS, Salazar LF (2006) Climate and land use changes in Amazonia: impacts on the hydrological cycle and biome distribution, in Water and Environment. In: Proceedings of the workshop in the Vatican Academy of Sciences, November 2005, Vatican Press, Rome (in press)

  • Notaro M, Vavrus S, Liu Z (2007) Global vegetation and climate change due to future increases in CO2 as projected by a fully coupled model with dynamic vegetation. J Clim 20:70–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou SCS, Liou KN, Liou WJ (1989) The seasonal cycle of the global zonally averaged energy balance. Theor Appl Climatol 40:9–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyama MD, Nobre CA (2003) A new climate-vegetation equilibrium state for tropical South America. Geophys Res Lett 30:2199. doi:10.1029/2003GL018600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyama MD, Nobre CA (2004) A simple potential vegetation model for coupling with the simple biosphere model (SIB). Rev Bras Meteorol 1:203–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltridge GW (1974) Global cloud cover and earth surface temperature. J Atmos Sci 31:1571–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice KC (1990) Bioclimatic distribution of vegetation for general circulation models. J Geophys Res 95:11811–11830

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice IC, Cramer W, Harrison SP, Leemans R, Monserud RA, Solomon AM (1992) A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties, and climate. J Biogeogr 19:117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos da Silva R, Werth D, Avissar R (2008) Regional impacts of future land-cover on the Amazon basin wet-season climate. J Clim 21:1153–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall DA, Wood RA (2007) Climate models and their evaluation. In: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 590–662

  • Salazar RF, Nobre CA, Oyama MD (2007) Climate change consequences on the biome distribution in tropical South America. Geophys Res Lett 34:L09708. doi:10.1029/2007GL029695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman B, Vernekar AD (1971) An equilibrium solution for the axially-symmetric components of the Earth’s macroclimate. J Geophys Res 76:1498–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman B, Vernekar AD (1972) Global equilibrium solutions for the zonally-averaged macroclimate. J Geophys Res 77:3936–3945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholze M, Knorr W, Arnell NW, Prentice IC (2006) A climate change risk analysis for world ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(35):13116–13120

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers WD (1973) A new climate model. J Appl Meteor 12:241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva MES, Franchito SH, Rao VB (2006) Effects of the Amazonian deforestation on regional climate: a numerical experiment with a coupled biosphere-atmosphere model with soil hydrology. Theor Appl Climatol 85:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitch S et al (2003) Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biol 9:161–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Mon Wea Rev 91:98–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Stott PA, Jones GS (2009) Variability of high latitude amplification of anthropogenic warming. Geophys Res Lett 36:L10701. doi:10.1029/2009GL037698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KE (1980) The roles of the mean meridional motions and large-scale eddies in zonally-averaged circulations. J Atmos Sci 37:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varejão-Silva MA, Franchito SH, Rao VB (1998) A coupled biosphere-atmosphere climate model suitable for use in climatic studies due to land surface alterations. J Clim 11:1749–1767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue Y, Shukla J (1993) The influence of land surface properties on Sahel climate. Part I. Desertification. J Clim 6:2232–2245

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to the reviewers for their useful suggestions. Thanks are also due to Mr. Felipe Sena for his computational help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio H. Franchito.

Appendix

Appendix

Meaning of the symbols of the surface and atmospheric diabatic fluxes parameterization used in the SDM.

a4 :

Constant equal to 0.1 × 10−5 m Pa−1 (HN) and 0.17 × 10−5 m Pa−1 (HS)

a44 :

Constant equal to 0.2 × l0−8 m s−1 (HS) and 0 (HN)

b, c, e, f:

Empirical constant independent of the latitude

g:

The acceleration of gravity

hb :

The cloud base height

ht :

The height of the top of the height cover

H:

The height of the atmosphere

k:

Factor proportional to the conductive capacity of surface medium

L:

Latent heat of vaporization

N:

Cloudiness amount at a latitude belt

Nm :

Hemispheric average of the cloudiness amount

ra :

Reflexivity of the atmosphere

rs :

Surface albedo

R o :

Solar radiation incident at the top of the atmosphere

Tb :

The radiation temperature at the cloud cover base

TD :

Subsurface temperature

Ts :

Air surface temperature

Tt :

The radiation temperature at the top of cloud cover

T2 :

Temperature at 500 hPa

ℱ(z1,z2):

The spectrally averaged transmission function between the levels z1 and z2

ℒ(z)↓:

The downward longwave flux of the clear atmosphere at the height z

ℒ(z)↑:

The upward longwave flux of the clear atmosphere at the level z

σB :

Stefan–Boltzman constant

τ:

Transmissivity of the atmosphere

w:

Water availability at the surface

ω:

Vertical velocity at 500 hPa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franchito, S.H., Brahmananda Rao, V. & Moraes, E.C. Impact of global warming on the geobotanic zones: an experiment with a statistical–dynamical climate model. Clim Dyn 37, 2021–2034 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0952-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0952-6

Keywords

Navigation