Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pineal/germ cell tumors and pineal parenchymal tumors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Pineal region tumors (PRTs) are tumors arising from the pineal gland and the paraspinal structures. These tumors are rare and heterogeneous that account for 2.8–10.1% and 0.6–3.2% of tumors in children and in all ages, respectively. Almost all types and subtypes of CNS tumors may be diagnosed in this region. These tumors come from cells of the pineal gland (pinealocytes and neuroglial cells), ectopic primordial germ cells (PGC), and cells from adjacent structures. Hence, PRTs are consisted of pineal parenchyma tumors (PPTs), germ cell tumors (GCTs), neuroepithelial tumors (NETs), other miscellaneous types of tumors, cystic tumors (epidermoid, dermoid), and pineal cyst in addition. The symptoms of PRTs correlate to the increased intracranial cranial pressure due to obstructive hydrocephalus and dorsal midbrain compression. The diagnostic imaging studies are mainly MRI of brain (with and without gadolinium) along with a sagittal view of whole spine. Serum and/or CSF AFP/β-HCG helps to identify GCTs. The treatment of PRTs is consisted of the selection of surgical biopsy/resection, handling of hydrocephalus, neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy according to age, tumor location, histopathological/molecular classification, grading of tumors, staging, and threshold value of markers (for GCTs) in addition.

Methods

In this article, we review the following focus points: 1. Background of pineal region tumors. 2. Pineal GCTs and evolution of management. 3. Molecular study for GCTs and pineal parenchymal tumors. 4. Review of surgical approaches to the pineal region. 5. Contribution of endoscopy. 6. Adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and combination). 7. Future direction.

Results

In all ages, the leading three types of PRTs in western countries were PPTs (22.7–34.8%), GCTs (27.3–34.4%), and NETs (17.2–28%). In children and young adults, the leading PRTs were invariably in the order of GCTs (40–80.5%), PPTs (7.6–21.6%), NETs (2.4–37.5%). Surgical biopsy/resection of PRTs is important for precision diagnosis and therapy. Safe resection with acceptable low mortality and morbidity was achieved after 1970s because of the advancement of surgical approaches, CSF shunt and valve system, microscopic and endoscopic surgery. Following histopathological diagnosis and classification of types and subtypes of PRTs, in PPTs, through molecular profiling, four molecular groups of pineoblastoma (PB) and their oncogenic driver were identified. Hence, molecular stratified precision therapy can be achieved.

Conclusion

Modern endoscopic and microsurgical approaches help to achieve precise histopathological diagnosis and molecular classification of different types and subtypes of pineal region tumors for risk-stratified optimal, effective, and protective therapy. In the future, molecular analysis of biospecimen (CSF and blood) along with AI radiomics on tumor imaging integrating clinical and bioinformation may help for personalized and risk-stratified management of patients with pineal region tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cho BK, Wang KC, Nam DH et al (1998) Pineal tumors: experience with 48 cases over 10 years. Childs Nerv Syst 14:53–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cho KT, Wang KC, Kim SK et al (2002) Pediatric brain tumors: statistics of SNUH, Korea (1959–2000). Childs Nerv Syst 18:30–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ostrom QT, Patil N, Cioffi G et al (2020) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2013–2017. Neuro Oncol 22:iv1–iv96

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong TT, Ho DM, Chang KP et al (2005) Primary pediatric brain tumors: statistics of Taipei VGH, Taiwan (1975–2004). Cancer 104:2156–2167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Hussaini M, Sultan I, Abuirmileh N et al (2009) Pineal gland tumors: experience from the SEER database. J Neurooncol 94:351–358

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Anonymous (2014) Brain tumor registry of Japan (2001–2004). Neurol Med Chir 54:9–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mottolese C, Beuriat PA, Szathmari A (2015) Pineal tumours: experience of the French National Register and the Lyon School, results and considerations. Neurochirurgie 61:223–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nomura K (2001) Epidemiology of germ cell tumors in Asia of pineal region tumor. J Neurooncol 54:211–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Favero G, Bonomini F, Rezzani R (2021) Pineal gland tumors: a review. Cancers (Basel) 13

  10. Oosterhuis JW, Looijenga LHJ (2019) Human germ cell tumours from a developmental perspective. Nat Rev Cancer 19:522–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruce JN, Stein BM (1995) Surgical management of pineal region tumors. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 134:130–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Konovalov AN, Pitskhelauri DI (2003) Principles of treatment of the pineal region tumors. Surg Neurol 59:250–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Drummond KJ, Rosenfeld JV (1999) Pineal region tumours in childhood. A 30-year experience. Childs Nerv Syst 15:119–126; discussion 127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oi S, Matsuzawa K, Choi JU et al (1998) Identical characteristics of the patient populations with pineal region tumors in Japan and in Korea and therapeutic modalities. Childs Nerv Syst 14:36–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tomita T, Alden TD, Dipatri AJ (2022) Pediatric pineal region tumors: institutional experience of surgical managements with posterior interhemispheric transtentorial approach. Childs Nerv Syst

  16. Wong TT, Chen HH, Liang ML et al (2011) Neuroendoscopy in the management of pineal tumors. Childs Nerv Syst 27:949–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P et al (2021) The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol 23:1231–1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsutani M, Sano K, Takakura K et al (1997) Primary intracranial germ cell tumors: a clinical analysis of 153 histologically verified cases. J Neurosurg 86:446–455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Michaiel G, Strother D, Gottardo N et al (2020) Intracranial growing teratoma syndrome (iGTS): an international case series and review of the literature. J Neurooncol 147:721–730

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scheckel CJ, Kosiorek HE, Butterfield R et al (2019) Germ cell tumors with malignant somatic transformation: a Mayo Clinic experience. Oncol Res Treat 42:95–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Qaddoumi I, Sane M, Li S et al (2012) Diagnostic utility and correlation of tumor markers in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of children with intracranial germ cell tumors. Childs Nerv Syst 28:1017–1024

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Allen JC, Nisselbaum J, Epstein F et al (1979) Alphafetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotropin determination in cerebrospinal fluid. An aid to the diagnosis and management of intracranial germ-cell tumors. J Neurosurg 51:368–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujimaki T, Mishima K, Asai A et al (2000) Levels of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with malignant germ cell tumor can be used to detect early recurrence and monitor the response to treatment. Jpn J Clin Oncol 30:291–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu M, Guan H, Lau CC et al (2016) An update on the clinical diagnostic value of β-hCG and αFP for intracranial germ cell tumors. Eur J Med Res 21:10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Calaminus G, Kortmann R, Worch J et al (2013) SIOP CNS GCT 96: final report of outcome of a prospective, multinational nonrandomized trial for children and adults with intracranial germinoma, comparing craniospinal irradiation alone with chemotherapy followed by focal primary site irradiation for patients with localized disease. Neuro Oncol 15:788–796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Takami H, Graffeo CS, Perry A et al. (2022) Roles of tumor markers in central nervous system germ cell tumors revisited with histopathology-proven cases in a large international cohort. Cancers (Basel) 14

  27. Biassoni V, Schiavello E, Gandola L et al (2020) Secreting germ cell tumors of the central nervous system: a long-term follow-up experience. Cancers (Basel) 12

  28. Murray MJ, Bartels U, Nishikawa R et al (2015) Consensus on the management of intracranial germ-cell tumours. Lancet Oncol 16:e470–e477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Calaminus G, Frappaz D, Kortmann RD et al (2017) Outcome of patients with intracranial non-germinomatous germ cell tumors-lessons from the SIOP-CNS-GCT-96 trial. Neuro Oncol 19:1661–1672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Logothetis CJ, Samuels ML, Trindade A et al (1982) The growing teratoma syndrome. Cancer 50:1629–1635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsuyuguchi S, Sugiyama K, Kinoshita Y et al (2020) Primary and recurrent growing teratoma syndrome in central nervous system nongerminomatous germ cell tumors: case series and review of the literature. World Neurosurg 134:e360–e371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rice KR, Magers MJ, Beck SD et al (2014) Management of germ cell tumors with somatic type malignancy: pathological features, prognostic factors and survival outcomes. J Urol 192:1403–1409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dandy WE (1921) An operation for the removal of pineal tumors. Surg Gynecol Obstet 33:113–119

    Google Scholar 

  34. Krause F (1926) Operative Freilegung der Vierhugel nebst Beobachtungen uber Hirndruck and Dekompression. Zbl Chir 53:2812–2819

    Google Scholar 

  35. Obrador S, Soto M, Gutierrez-Diaz JA (1976) Surgical management of tumours of the pineal region. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 34:159–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Araki C, Matsumoto S (1969) Statistical reevaluation of pinealoma and related tumors in Japan. J Neurosurg 30:146–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Abay EO 2nd, Laws ER Jr, Grado GL et al (1981) Pineal tumors in children and adolescents. Treatment by CSF shunting and radiotherapy. J Neurosurg 55:889–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bradfield JS, Perez CA (1972) Pineal tumors and ectopic pinealomas. Analysis of treatment and failures Radiology 103:399–406

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Salazar OM, Castro-Vita H, Bakos RS et al (1979) Radiation therapy for tumors of the pineal region. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 5:491–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Aschoff A, Kremer P, Hashemi B et al (1999) The scientific history of hydrocephalus and its treatment. Neurosurg Rev 22:67–93; discussion 94–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Demerdash A, Rocque BG, Johnston J et al (2017) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: a historical review. Br J Neurosurg 31:28–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Di Rocco C, Cinalli G, Massimi L et al (2006) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 31:119–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rickert CH, Simon R, Bergmann M et al (2000) Comparative genomic hybridization in pineal germ cell tumors. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 59:815–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Okada Y, Nishikawa R, Matsutani M et al (2002) Hypomethylated X chromosome gain and rare isochromosome 12p in diverse intracranial germ cell tumors. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 61:531–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Fukushima S, Otsuka A, Suzuki T et al (2014) Mutually exclusive mutations of KIT and RAS are associated with KIT mRNA expression and chromosomal instability in primary intracranial pure germinomas. Acta Neuropathol 127:911–925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Goddard NC, Mcintyre A, Summersgill B et al (2007) KIT and RAS signalling pathways in testicular germ cell tumours: new data and a review of the literature. Int J Androl 30:337–348; discussion 349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang L, Yamaguchi S, Burstein MD et al (2014) Novel somatic and germline mutations in intracranial germ cell tumours. Nature 511:241–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Fevre-Montange M, Vasiljevic A, Champier J et al (2010) Histopathology of tumors of the pineal region. Future Oncol 6:791–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Jouvet A, Saint-Pierre G, Fauchon F et al (2000) Pineal parenchymal tumors: a correlation of histological features with prognosis in 66 cases. Brain Pathol 10:49–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Blach LE, Mccormick B, Abramson DH et al (1994) Trilateral retinoblastoma–incidence and outcome: a decade of experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 29:729–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. De Jong MC, Kors WA, De Graaf P et al (2014) Trilateral retinoblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 15:1157–1167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lin S, Gregory RI (2015) MicroRNA biogenesis pathways in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 15:321–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Li BK, Vasiljevic A, Dufour C et al (2020) Pineoblastoma segregates into molecular sub-groups with distinct clinico-pathologic features: a Rare Brain Tumor Consortium registry study. Acta Neuropathol 139:223–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu APY, Gudenas B, Lin T et al (2020) Risk-adapted therapy and biological heterogeneity in pineoblastoma: integrated clinico-pathological analysis from the prospective, multi-center SJMB03 and SJYC07 trials. Acta Neuropathol 139:259–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Pfaff E, Aichmuller C, Sill M et al (2020) Molecular subgrouping of primary pineal parenchymal tumors reveals distinct subtypes correlated with clinical parameters and genetic alterations. Acta Neuropathol 139:243–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sabbaghian N, Hamel N, Srivastava A et al (2012) Germline DICER1 mutation and associated loss of heterozygosity in a pineoblastoma. J Med Genet 49:417–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Snuderl M, Kannan K, Pfaff E et al (2018) Recurrent homozygous deletion of DROSHA and microduplication of PDE4DIP in pineoblastoma. Nat Commun 9:2868

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Liu APY, Li BK, Pfaff E et al (2021) Clinical and molecular heterogeneity of pineal parenchymal tumors: a consensus study. Acta Neuropathol 141:771–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Bandopadhayay P, Bergthold G, Nguyen B et al (2014) BET bromodomain inhibition of MYC-amplified medulloblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 20:912–925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Bolin S, Borgenvik A, Persson CU et al (2018) Combined BET bromodomain and CDK2 inhibition in MYC-driven medulloblastoma. Oncogene 37:2850–2862

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Chung PED, Gendoo DMA, Ghanbari-Azarnier R et al (2020) Modeling germline mutations in pineoblastoma uncovers lysosome disruption-based therapy. Nat Commun 11:1825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Ogiwara H, Kiyotani C, Terashima K et al (2015) Second-look surgery for intracranial germ cell tumors. Neurosurgery 76:658–661; discussion 661–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Horrax G (1937) Extirpation of a huge pinealoma from a patient with pubertas praecox: a new operative approach. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 37:385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Poppen JL (1966) The right occipital approach to a pinealoma. J Neurosurg 25:706–710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Stein BM (1971) The infratentorial supracerebellar approach to pineal lesions. J Neurosurg 35:197–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Bruce J (2011) Youmans Neurological Surgery

  67. Hernesniemi J, Romani R, Albayrak BS et al (2008) Microsurgical management of pineal region lesions: personal experience with 119 patients. Surg Neurol 70:576–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Qi S, Fan J, Zhang XA et al (2014) Radical resection of nongerminomatous pineal region tumors via the occipital transtentorial approach based on arachnoidal consideration: experience on a series of 143 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:2253–2262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Hart MG, Santarius T, Kirollos RW (2013) How I do it–pineal surgery: supracerebellar infratentorial versus occipital transtentorial. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 155:463–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Ogiwara H (2022) Second-look surgery for pineal region tumors. Childs Nerv Syst

  71. Tomita T (2008) Pineal region tumors. Principles and practice of pediatrics neurosurgery, 2nd edn. Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, pp 585–560

    Google Scholar 

  72. Deopujari C, Shroff K, Karmarkar V et al (2022) Neuroendoscopy in the management of pineal region tumours in children. Childs Nerv Syst

  73. Fukushima T (1978) Endoscopic biopsy of intraventricular tumors with the use of a ventriculofiberscope. Neurosurgery 2:110–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Morgenstern PF, Souweidane MM (2013) Pineal region tumors: simultaneous endoscopic third ventriculostomy and tumor biopsy. World Neurosurg 79(S18):e19–e13

    Google Scholar 

  75. Samadian M, Maloumeh EN, Shiravand S et al (2019) Pineal region tumors: long-term results of endoscopic third ventriculostomy and concurrent tumor biopsy with a single entry approach in a series of 64 cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Al-Tamimi YZ, Bhargava D, Surash S et al (2008) Endoscopic biopsy during third ventriculostomy in paediatric pineal region tumours. Childs Nerv Syst 24:1323–1326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Herrada-Pineda T, Revilla-Pacheco F, Manrique-Guzman S (2015) Endoscopic approach for the treatment of pineal region tumors. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 76:8–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Schulz M, Afshar-Bakshloo M, Koch A et al (2021) Management of pineal region tumors in a pediatric case series. Neurosurg Rev 44:1417–1427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Yamini B, Refai D, Rubin CM et al (2004) Initial endoscopic management of pineal region tumors and associated hydrocephalus: clinical series and literature review. J Neurosurg 100:437–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Colditz M, Winter C (2013) Delayed intra-tumoural haemorrhage in pineal germinoma: Case report and review. World 3:186–189

    Google Scholar 

  81. Cai Y, Xiong Z, Xin C et al (2021) Endoscope-assisted microsurgery in pediatric cases with pineal region tumors: a study of 18 cases series. Front Surg 8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Gore PA, Gonzalez LF, Rekate HL et al (2008) Endoscopic supracerebellar infratentorial approach for pineal cyst resection: technical case report. Neurosurgery 62:108–109; discussion 109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Gu Y, Zhou Q, Zhu W et al (2019) The purely endoscopic supracerebellar infratentorial approach for resecting pineal region tumors with preservation of cerebellomesencephalic vein: technical note and preliminary clinical outcomes. World Neurosurg 128:e334–e339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Mamelak AN, Drazin D, Shirzadi A et al (2012) Infratentorial supracerebellar resection of a pineal tumor using a high definition video exoscope (VITOM(R)). J Clin Neurosci 19:306–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Hua W, Xu H, Zhang X et al (2023) Pure endoscopic resection of pineal region tumors through supracerebellar infratentorial approach with 'head-up' park-bench position. Neurol Res 45:354–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Chen YW, Huang PI, Ho DM et al (2012) Change in treatment strategy for intracranial germinoma: long-term follow-up experience at a single institute. Cancer 118:2752–2762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Liang SY, Yang TF, Chen YW et al (2013) Neuropsychological functions and quality of life in survived patients with intracranial germ cell tumors after treatment. Neuro Oncol 15:1543–1551

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. O’neil S, Ji L, Buranahirun C, et al (2011) Neurocognitive outcomes in pediatric and adolescent patients with central nervous system germinoma treated with a strategy of chemotherapy followed by reduced-dose and volume irradiation. Pediatr Blood Cancer 57:669–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Bamberg M, Kortmann RD, Calaminus G et al (1999) Radiation therapy for intracranial germinoma: results of the German cooperative prospective trials MAKEI 83/86/89. J Clin Oncol 17:2585–2592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Calaminus G, Bamberg M, Baranzelli MC et al (1994) Intracranial germ cell tumors: a comprehensive update of the European data. Neuropediatrics 25:26–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Cho J, Choi JU, Kim DS et al (2009) Low-dose craniospinal irradiation as a definitive treatment for intracranial germinoma. Radiother Oncol 91:75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Goldman S, Bouffet E, Fisher PG et al (2015) Phase II trial assessing the ability of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without second-look surgery to eliminate measurable disease for nongerminomatous germ cell tumors: a Children’s Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 33:2464–2471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Shibamoto Y, Abe M, Yamashita J et al (1988) Treatment results of intracranial germinoma as a function of the irradiated volume. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 15:285–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Sawamura Y, Ikeda J, Shirato H et al (1998) Germ cell tumours of the central nervous system: treatment consideration based on 111 cases and their long-term clinical outcomes. Eur J Cancer 34:104–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Alapetite C, Brisse H, Patte C et al (2010) Pattern of relapse and outcome of non-metastatic germinoma patients treated with chemotherapy and limited field radiation: the SFOP experience. Neuro Oncol 12:1318–1325

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Khatua S, Dhall G, O’neil S, et al (2010) Treatment of primary CNS germinomatous germ cell tumors with chemotherapy prior to reduced dose whole ventricular and local boost irradiation. Pediatr Blood Cancer 55:42–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Balmaceda C, Heller G, Rosenblum M et al (1996) Chemotherapy without irradiation–a novel approach for newly diagnosed CNS germ cell tumors: results of an international cooperative trial. The First International Central Nervous System Germ Cell Tumor Study. J Clin Oncol 14:2908–2915

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Da Silva NS, Cappellano AM, Diez B et al (2010) Primary chemotherapy for intracranial germ cell tumors: results of the third international CNS germ cell tumor study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 54:377–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Kellie SJ, Boyce H, Dunkel IJ et al (2004) Primary chemotherapy for intracranial nongerminomatous germ cell tumors: results of the second international CNS germ cell study group protocol. J Clin Oncol 22:846–853

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Rogers SJ, Mosleh-Shirazi MA, Saran FH (2005) Radiotherapy of localised intracranial germinoma: time to sever historical ties? Lancet Oncol 6:509–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Wang WG, Ye H, Chinnaiyan P (2018) Practice patterns and survival outcomes of intracranial germinoma: an analysis of the National Cancer Database. J Neurooncol 137:77–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Aoyama H, Shirato H, Ikeda J et al (2002) Induction chemotherapy followed by low-dose involved-field radiotherapy for intracranial germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 20:857–865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Joo JH, Park JH, Ra YS et al (2014) Treatment outcome of radiation therapy for intracranial germinoma: adaptive radiation field in relation to response to chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 34:5715–5721

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Shikama N, Ogawa K, Tanaka S et al (2005) Lack of benefit of spinal irradiation in the primary treatment of intracranial germinoma: a multiinstitutional, retrospective review of 180 patients. Cancer 104:126–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Baranzelli MC, Patte C, Bouffet E et al (1997) Nonmetastatic intracranial germinoma: the experience of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology. Cancer 80:1792–1797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Bouffet E, Baranzelli MC, Patte C et al (1999) Combined treatment modality for intracranial germinomas: results of a multicentre SFOP experience. Societe Francaise d'Oncologie Pediatrique. Br J Cancer 79:1199–1204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Bartels U, Onar-Thomas A, Patel SK et al (2022) Phase II trial of response-based radiation therapy for patients with localized germinoma: a Children’s Oncology Group study. Neuro Oncol 24:974–983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Hwang EI, Kool M, Burger PC et al (2018) Extensive molecular and clinical heterogeneity in patients with histologically diagnosed CNS-PNET treated as a single entity: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group randomized ACNS0332 trial. J Clin Oncol 36:JCO2017764720

  109. Shibamoto Y, Takahashi M, Sasai K (1997) Prognosis of intracranial germinoma with syncytiotrophoblastic giant cells treated by radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37:505–510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Cheng S, Kilday JP, Laperriere N et al (2016) Outcomes of children with central nervous system germinoma treated with multi-agent chemotherapy followed by reduced radiation. J Neurooncol 127:173–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Fukushima S, Yamashita S, Kobayashi H et al (2017) Genome-wide methylation profiles in primary intracranial germ cell tumors indicate a primordial germ cell origin for germinomas. Acta Neuropathol 133:445–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Huang PI, Chen YW, Wong TT et al (2008) Extended focal radiotherapy of 30 Gy alone for intracranial synchronous bifocal germinoma: a single institute experience. Childs Nerv Syst 24:1315–1321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Kanamori M, Takami H, Yamaguchi S et al (2021) So-called bifocal tumors with diabetes insipidus and negative tumor markers: are they all germinoma? Neuro Oncol 23:295–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Kang YM, Lee YY, Lin SC et al (2022) Bifocal lesions have a poorer treatment outcome than a single lesion in adult patients with intracranial germinoma. PLoS ONE 17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Frappaz D, Dhall G, Murray MJ et al (2022) EANO, SNO and Euracan consensus review on the current management and future development of intracranial germ cell tumors in adolescents and young adults. Neuro Oncol 24:516–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Nakamura H, Takami H, Yanagisawa T et al (2022) The Japan Society for Neuro-Oncology guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of central nervous system germ cell tumors. Neuro Oncol 24:503–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Callec L, Lardy-Cleaud A, Guerrini-Rousseau L et al (2020) Relapsing intracranial germ cell tumours warrant retreatment. Eur J Cancer 136:186–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Koh KN, Wong RX, Lee DE et al (2022) Outcomes of intracranial germinoma-a retrospective multinational Asian study on effect of clinical presentation and differential treatment strategies. Neuro Oncol 24:1389–1399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Baek HJ, Park HJ, Sung KW et al (2013) Myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed or progressed central nervous system germ cell tumors: results of Korean Society of Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (KSPNO) S-053 study. J Neurooncol 114:329–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Bouffet E (2010) The role of myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic cell rescue in central nervous system germ cell tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 54:644–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Robertson PL, Darosso RC, Allen JC (1997) Improved prognosis of intracranial non-germinoma germ cell tumors with multimodality therapy. J Neurooncol 32:71–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Ogawa K, Toita T, Nakamura K et al (2003) Treatment and prognosis of patients with intracranial nongerminomatous malignant germ cell tumors: a multiinstitutional retrospective analysis of 41 patients. Cancer 98:369–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Fangusaro J, Wu S, Macdonald S et al (2019) Phase II trial of response-based radiation therapy for patients with localized CNS nongerminomatous germ cell tumors: a Children’s Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 37:3283–3290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Calaminus G, Frappaz D, Kortmann R-D et al (2008) Localized and metastatic nongerminoma treated according to the SIOP CNS GCT 96 protocol: update on risk profiles and outcome. In: Neuro-Oncology. OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC JOURNALS DEPT, 2001 EVANS RD, CARY, NC 27513 USA, pp 418–419

  125. Fonseca A, Faure-Conter C, Murray MJ et al (2022) Pattern of treatment failures in patients with central nervous system non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (CNS-NGGCT): a pooled analysis of clinical trials. Neuro Oncol 24:1950–1961

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Souweidane MM, Krieger MD, Weiner HL et al (2010) Surgical management of primary central nervous system germ cell tumors: proceedings from the Second International Symposium on Central Nervous System Germ Cell Tumors. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6:125–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Abu Arja MH, Bouffet E, Finlay JL et al (2019) Critical review of the management of primary central nervous nongerminomatous germ cell tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Clark AJ, Sughrue ME, Aranda D et al (2011) Contemporary management of pineocytoma. Neurosurg Clin N Am 22(403–407):ix

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. De Girolami U, Fevre-Montange M, Seilhean D et al (2008) Pathology of tumors of the pineal region. Rev Neurol (Paris) 164:882–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Hirato J, Nakazato Y (2001) Pathology of pineal region tumors. J Neurooncol 54:239–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Schild SE, Scheithauer BW, Haddock MG et al (1996) Histologically confirmed pineal tumors and other germ cell tumors of the brain. Cancer 78:2564–2571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Mori Y, Kobayashi T, Hasegawa T et al (2009) Stereotactic radiosurgery for pineal and related tumors. Prog Neurol Surg 23:106–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Clark AJ, Ivan ME, Sughrue ME et al (2010) Tumor control after surgery and radiotherapy for pineocytoma. J Neurosurg 113:319–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Kunigelis KE, Kleinschmidt-Demasters BK, Youssef AS et al (2021) Clinical features of pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID): a single-institution series. World Neurosurg 155:e229–e235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Fevre Montange M, Vasiljevic A, Champier J et al (2015) Papillary tumor of the pineal region: histopathological characterization and review of the literature. Neurochirurgie 61:138–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Kamamoto D, Sasaki H, Ohara K et al (2016) A case of papillary tumor of the pineal region with a long clinical history: molecular characterization and therapeutic consideration with review of the literature. Brain Tumor Pathol 33:271–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Thomas C, Wefers A, Bens S et al (2020) Desmoplastic myxoid tumor, SMARCB1-mutant: clinical, histopathological and molecular characterization of a pineal region tumor encountered in adolescents and adults. Acta Neuropathol 139:277–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD et al (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114:97–109

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Duffner PK, Horowitz ME, Krischer JP et al (1999) The treatment of malignant brain tumors in infants and very young children: an update of the Pediatric Oncology Group experience. Neuro Oncol 1:152–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Geyer JR, Sposto R, Jennings M et al (2005) Multiagent chemotherapy and deferred radiotherapy in infants with malignant brain tumors: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 23:7621–7631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Geyer JR, Zeltzer PM, Boyett JM et al (1994) Survival of infants with primitive neuroectodermal tumors or malignant ependymomas of the CNS treated with eight drugs in 1 day: a report from the Childrens Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 12:1607–1615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Jakacki RI, Zeltzer PM, Boyett JM et al (1995) Survival and prognostic factors following radiation and/or chemotherapy for primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the pineal region in infants and children: a report of the Childrens Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 13:1377–1383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Hinkes BG, Von Hoff K, Deinlein F et al (2007) Childhood pineoblastoma: experiences from the prospective multicenter trials HIT-SKK87, HIT-SKK92 and HIT91. J Neurooncol 81:217–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Fangusaro J, Finlay J, Sposto R et al (2008) Intensive chemotherapy followed by consolidative myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic cell rescue (AuHCR) in young children with newly diagnosed supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors (sPNETs): report of the Head Start I and II experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer 50:312–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Pizer BL, Weston CL, Robinson KJ et al (2006) Analysis of patients with supratentorial primitive neuro-ectodermal tumours entered into the SIOP/UKCCSG PNET 3 study. Eur J Cancer 42:1120–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Gerber NU, Von Hoff K, Resch A et al (2014) Treatment of children with central nervous system primitive neuroectodermal tumors/pinealoblastomas in the prospective multicentric trial HIT 2000 using hyperfractionated radiation therapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 89:863–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Jakacki R, Zhou T, Holmes E et al (2008) Outcome for patients with nonpineal supratentorial PNET treated with carboplatin as a radiosensitizer during radiotherapy (RT) followed by adjuvant cyclophosphamide (CPM) and vincristine (VCR): preliminary results of COG 99701. In: Neuro-Oncology. OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC JOURNALS DEPT, 2001 EVANS RD, CARY, NC 27513 USA, p 485–485

  148. De Mattos-Arruda L, Mayor R, Ng CKY et al (2015) Cerebrospinal fluid-derived circulating tumour DNA better represents the genomic alterations of brain tumours than plasma. Nat Commun 6:8839

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Ichimura K, Fukushima S, Totoki Y et al (2016) Recurrent neomorphic mutations of MTOR in central nervous system and testicular germ cell tumors may be targeted for therapy. Acta Neuropathol 131:889–901

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Murray MJ, Ajithkumar T, Harris F et al (2020) Clinical utility of circulating miR-371a-3p for the management of patients with intracranial malignant germ cell tumors. Neurooncol Adv 2:vdaa048

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Takami H, Fukuoka K, Fukushima S et al (2019) Integrated clinical, histopathological, and molecular data analysis of 190 central nervous system germ cell tumors from the iGCT Consortium. Neuro Oncol 21:1565–1577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  152. Allen J, Chacko J, Donahue B et al (2012) Diagnostic sensitivity of serum and lumbar CSF bHCG in newly diagnosed CNS germinoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 59:1180–1182

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Zhang H, Zhang P, Fan J et al (2016) Determining an optimal cutoff of serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin for assisting the diagnosis of intracranial germinomas. PLoS ONE 11

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. Fukuoka K, Yanagisawa T, Suzuki T et al (2016) Human chorionic gonadotropin detection in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with a germinoma and its prognostic significance: assessment by using a highly sensitive enzyme immunoassay. J Neurosurg Pediatr 18:573–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Ce M, Irmici G, Foschini C et al (2023) Artificial intelligence in brain tumor imaging: a step toward personalized medicine. Curr Oncol 30:2673–2701

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ku-Sheng Wu and Yu-Han Jung for editing the manuscript and the manuscript.

Funding

The clinical and basic research on pediatric brain tumors in TMUH is support by the funding from National Science and Technology Council (Taiwan) grant (MOST 111-2314-B-038-145-; MOST 111–2314-B-038 -131 -MY3); the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (Taiwan) (MOE) (DP2-111-21121-01-C-04-01); and the Ministry of Health and Welfare (Taiwan) grant (MOHW112-TDU-B-222-124017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: T.-T.W. Writing—original draft preparation: T.-T.W., H.O, Y.-M.L. Writing—review and editing: T.-T.W., H.O., Y.-M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tai-Tong Wong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ogiwara, H., Liao, YM. & Wong, TT. Pineal/germ cell tumors and pineal parenchymal tumors. Childs Nerv Syst 39, 2649–2665 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-06081-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-06081-1

Keywords

Navigation