Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classification and controversies in pathology of ependymomas

  • Invited Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Bailey and Cushing established ependymoma as a brain tumour entity in the first brain tumour classification (1926). Diagnosis of ependymomas is not subject to controversy as long as other tumours presenting ependymoma-like features have been ruled out. Grading conversely is a source of debate. Description of histological features establishing diagnosis and grading of ependymomas may help to better understand this controversy.

Methods

Literature has been reviewed using PubMed with the following key words: ependymoma, +/− prognosis, +/− biomaker, +/− grading, +/− immunohistochemistry, +/− proliferative index.

Results

Grading controversy arises from elusive WHO features and individual characteristics of ependymomas including tumour location, tumour pattern/variant and variable expression of biomarkers.

Conclusion

There is a need for a grading scheme with a proven general ability to dissociate grades, and to predict individual clinical evolution. Only then will stratified and targeted therapeutics for ependymal tumours be possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agaoglu FY, Ayan I, Dizdar Y, Kebudi R, Gorgun O, Darendeliler E (2005) Ependymal tumors in childhood. Pediatr Blood Cancer 45:298–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennetto L, Foreman N, Harding B, Hayward R, Ironside J, Love S, Ellison D (1998) Ki-67 immunolabelling index is a prognostic indicator in childhood posterior fossa ependymomas. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 24:434–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burger PC, Scheithauer BW (2007) Tumors of the central nervous system. ARP, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carter M, Nicholson J, Ross F, Crolla J, Allibone R, Balaji V, Perry R, Walker D, Gilbertson R, Ellison DW (2002) Genetic abnormalities detected in ependymomas by comparative genomic hybridisation. Br J Cancer 86:929–939

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ernestus RI, Wilcke O, Schroder R (1989) Intracranial ependymomas: prognostic aspects. Neurosurg Rev 12:157–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ernestus RI, Wilcke O, Schroder R (1991) Supratentorial ependymomas in childhood: clinicopathological findings and prognosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 111:96–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ernestus RI, Schroder R, Stutzer H, Klug N (1996) Prognostic relevance of localization and grading in intracranial ependymomas of childhood. Childs Nerv Syst 12:522–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ernestus RI, Schroder R, Stutzer H, Klug N (1997) The clinical and prognostic relevance of grading in intracranial ependymomas. Br J Neurosurg 11:421–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fassett DR, Pingree J, Kestle JR (2005) The high incidence of tumor dissemination in myxopapillary ependymoma in pediatric patients. Report of five cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 102:59–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Figarella-Branger D, Civatte M, Bouvier-Labit C, Gouvernet J, Gambarelli D, Gentet JC, Lena G, Choux M, Pellissier JF (2000) Prognostic factors in intracranial ependymomas in children. J Neurosurg 93:605–613

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Friede RL, Pollak A (1978) The cytogenetic basis for classifying ependymomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 37:103–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirose Y, Aldape K, Bollen A, James CD, Brat D, Lamborn K, Berger M, Feuerstein BG (2001) Chromosomal abnormalities subdivide ependymal tumors into clinically relevant groups. Am J Pathol 158:1137–1143

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Horn B, Heideman R, Geyer R, Pollack I, Packer R, Goldwein J, Tomita T, Schomberg P, Ater J, Luchtman-Jones L, Rivlin K, Lamborn K, Prados M, Bollen A, Berger M, Dahl G, McNeil E, Patterson K, Shaw D, Kubalik M, Russo C (1999) A multi-institutional retrospective study of intracranial ependymoma in children: identification of risk factors. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 21:203–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishizawa K, Komori T, Shimada S, Hirose T (2008) Olig2 and CD99 are useful negative markers for the diagnosis of brain tumors. Clin Neuropathol 27:118–128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jaing TH, Wang HS, Tsay PK, Tseng CK, Jung SM, Lin KL, Lui TN (2004) Multivariate analysis of clinical prognostic factors in children with intracranial ependymomas. J Neurooncol 68:255–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jouvet A, Fauchon F, Liberski P, Saint-Pierre G, Didier-Bazes M, Heitzmann A, Delisle MB, Biassette HA, Vincent S, Mikol J, Streichenberger N, Ahboucha S, Brisson C, Belin MF, Fevre-Montange M (2003) Papillary tumor of the pineal region. Am J Surg Pathol 27:505–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kawano N, Yada K, Yagishita S (1989) Clear cell ependymoma. A histological variant with diagnostic implications. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 415:467–472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Komori T, Scheithauer BW, Anthony DC, Rosenblum MK, McLendon RE, Scott RM, Okazaki H, Kobayashi M (1998) Papillary glioneuronal tumor: a new variant of mixed neuronal-glial neoplasm. Am J Surg Pathol 22:1171–1183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Korshunov A, Golanov A, Timirgaz V (2000) Immunohistochemical markers for intracranial ependymoma recurrence. An analysis of 88 cases. J Neurol Sci 177:72–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Korshunov A, Golanov A, Timirgaz V (2002) Immunohistochemical markers for prognosis of ependymal neoplasms. J Neurooncol 58:255–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Korshunov A, Neben K, Wrobel G, Tews B, Benner A, Hahn M, Golanov A, Lichter P (2003) Gene expression patterns in ependymomas correlate with tumor location, grade, and patient age. Am J Pathol 163:1721–1727

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Korshunov A, Golanov A, Sycheva R, Timirgaz V (2004) The histologic grade is a main prognostic factor for patients with intracranial ependymomas treated in the microneurosurgical era: an analysis of 258 patients. Cancer 100:1230–1237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kurt E, Zheng PP, Hop WC, van der Weiden M, Bol M, van den Bent MJ, Avezaat CJ, Kros JM (2006) Identification of relevant prognostic histopathologic features in 69 intracranial ependymomas, excluding myxopapillary ependymomas and subependymomas. Cancer 106:388–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lehman NL (2008) Patterns of brain infiltration and secondary structure formation in supra-tentorial ependymal tumors. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 67:900–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lehman NL (2008) Central nervous system tumors with ependymal features: a broadened spectrum of primarily ependymal differentiation? J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 67:177–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lellouch-Tubiana A, Boddaert N, Bourgeois M, Fohlen M, Jouvet A, Delalande O, Seidenwurm D, Brunelle F, Sainte-Rose C (2005) Angiocentric neuroepithelial tumor (ANET): a new epilepsy-related clinicopathological entity with distinctive MRI. Brain Pathol 15:281–286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (2007) WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon

  28. McGuire CS, Sainani KL, Fisher PG (2009) Both location and age predict survival in ependymoma: A SEER study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 52:65–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mendrzyk F, Korshunov A, Benner A, Toedt G, Pfister S, Radlwimmer B, Lichter P (2006) Identification of gains on 1q and epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression as independent prognostic markers in intracranial ependymoma. Clin Cancer Res 12:2070–2079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Merchant TE, Jenkins JJ, Burger PC, Sanford RA, Sherwood SH, Jones-Wallace D, Heideman RL, Thompson SJ, Helton KJ, Kun LE (2002) Influence of tumor grade on time to progression after irradiation for localized ependymoma in children. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53:52–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Modena P, Lualdi E, Facchinetti F, Veltman J, Reid JF, Minardi S, Janssen I, Giangaspero F, Forni M, Finocchiaro G, Genitori L, Giordano F, Riccardi R, Schoenmakers EF, Massimino M, Sozzi G (2006) Identification of tumor-specific molecular signatures in intracranial ependymoma and association with clinical characteristics. J Clin Oncol 24:5223–5233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nazar GB, Hoffman HJ, Becker LE, Jenkin D, Humphreys RP, Hendrick EB (1990) Infratentorial ependymomas in childhood: prognostic factors and treatment. J Neurosurg 72:408–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Perilongo G, Massimino M, Sotti G, Belfontali T, Masiero L, Rigobello L, Garre L, Carli M, Lombardi F, Solero C, Sainati L, Canale V, del Prever AB, Giangaspero F, Andreussi L, Mazza C, Madon E (1997) Analyses of prognostic factors in a retrospective review of 92 children with ependymoma: Italian Pediatric Neuro-oncology Group. Med Pediatr Oncol 29:79–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Port JD, Brat DJ, Burger PC, Pomper MG (2002) Astroblastoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation and distinction from ependymoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:243–247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Preusser M, Wolfsberger S, Czech T, Slavc I, Budka H, Hainfellner JA (2005) Surviving expression in intracranial ependymomas and its correlation with tumor cell proliferation and patient outcome. Am J Clin Pathol 124:543–549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Preusser M, Heinzl H, Gelpi E, Hoftberger R, Fischer I, Pipp I, Milenkovic I, Wohrer A, Popovici F, Wolfsberger S, Hainfellner JA (2008) Ki67 index in intracranial ependymoma: a promising histopathological candidate biomarker. Histopathology 53:39–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ridley L, Rahman R, Brundler MA, Ellison D, Lowe J, Robson K, Prebble E, Luckett I, Gilbertson RJ, Parkes S, Rand V, Coyle B, Grundy RG (2008) Multifactorial analysis of predictors of outcome in pediatric intracranial ependymoma. Neuro Oncol 10:675–689

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rousseau E, Ruchoux MM, Scaravilli F, Chapon F, Vinchon M, De Smet C, Godfraind C, Vikkula M (2003) CDKN2A, CDKN2B and p14ARF are frequently and differentially methylated in ependymal tumours. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 29:574–583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Rousseau E, Palm T, Scaravilli F, Ruchoux MM, Figarella-Branger D, Salmon I, Ellison D, Lacroix C, Chapon F, Mikol J, Vikkula M, Godfraind C (2007) Trisomy 19 ependymoma, a newly recognized genetico-histological association, including clear cell ependymoma. Mol Cancer 6:47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rubinstein LJ (1989) Pathology of tumours of the nervous system. Edward Arnold

  41. Rushing EJ, Yashima K, Brown DF, White CL 3rd, Shay JW, Risser RC, Gazdar AF (1997) Expression of telomerase RNA component correlates with the MIB-1 proliferation index in ependymomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 56:1142–1146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Rushing EJ, Brown DF, Hladik CL, Risser RC, Mickey BE, White CL 3rd (1998) Correlation of bcl-2, p53, and MIB-1 expression with ependymoma grade and subtype. Mod Pathol 11:464–470

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sala F, Talacchi A, Mazza C, Prisco R, Ghimenton C, Bricolo A (1998) Prognostic factors in childhood intracranial ependymomas: the role of age and tumor location. Pediatr Neurosurg 28:135–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Singh PK, Gutmann DH, Fuller CE, Newsham IF, Perry A (2002) Differential involvement of protein 4.1 family members DAL-1 and NF2 in intracranial and intraspinal ependymomas. Mod Pathol 15:526–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Snuderl M, Chi SN, De Santis SM, Stemmer-Rachamimov AO, Betensky RA, De Girolami U, Kieran MW (2008) Prognostic value of tumor microinvasion and metalloproteinases expression in intracranial pediatric ependymomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 67:911–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Taylor MD, Poppleton H, Fuller C, Su X, Liu Y, Jensen P, Magdaleno S, Dalton J, Calabrese C, Board J, Macdonald T, Rutka J, Guha A, Gajjar A, Curran T, Gilbertson RJ (2005) Radial glia cells are candidate stem cells of ependymoma. Cancer Cell 8:323–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Tihan T, Zhou T, Holmes E, Burger PC, Ozuysal S, Rushing EJ (2008) The prognostic value of histological grading of posterior fossa ependymomas in children: a Children's Oncology Group study and a review of prognostic factors. Mod Pathol 21:165–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Trembath D, Miller CR, Perry A (2008) Gray zones in brain tumor classification: evolving concepts. Adv Anat Pathol 15:287–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang M, Tihan T, Rojiani AM, Bodhireddy SR, Prayson RA, Iacuone JJ, Alles AJ, Donahue DJ, Hessler RB, Kim JH, Haas M, Rosenblum MK, Burger PC (2005) Monomorphous angiocentric glioma: a distinctive epileptogenic neoplasm with features of infiltrating astrocytoma and ependymoma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 64:875–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wolfsberger S, Fischer I, Hoftberger R, Birner P, Slavc I, Dieckmann K, Czech T, Budka H, Hainfellner J (2004) Ki-67 immunolabeling index is an accurate predictor of outcome in patients with intracranial ependymoma. Am J Surg Pathol 28:914–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yan X, Cheng X, Liu J, Luo D, He X, Chen F, Qin C, Wang Y (2008) Clinicopathological evaluation of immunohistochemical Ki-67 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression in intracranial ependymoma. Clin Invest Med 31:E206–E211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zamecnik J, Snuderl M, Eckschlager T, Chanova M, Hladikova M, Tichy M, Kodet R (2003) Pediatric intracranial ependymomas: prognostic relevance of histological, immunohistochemical, and flow cytometric factors. Mod Pathol 16:980–991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Zheng PP, Pang JC, Hui AB, Ng HK (2000) Comparative genomic hybridization detects losses of chromosomes 22 and 16 as the most common recurrent genetic alterations in primary ependymomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 122:18–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wish to thank F. Scaravilli, M.D., Ph.D., D. Figarella-Branger, M.D., Ph.D., C. Galant, M.D., Ph.D., and N. Limaye, Ph.D. for their kind and critical review of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Godfraind.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godfraind, C. Classification and controversies in pathology of ependymomas. Childs Nerv Syst 25, 1185–1193 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-008-0804-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-008-0804-4

Keywords

Navigation