Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The estimation of coronary artery calcium thickness by computed tomography angiography based on optical coherence tomography measurements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is recommended to be the most appropriate modality in assessing calcium thickness, however, it has limitations associated with infrared attenuation. Although coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) detects calcification, it has low resolution and hence not recommended to measure the calcium size. The aim of this study was to devise a simple algorithm to estimate calcium thickness based on the CCTA image. A total of 68 patients who had CCTA for suspected coronary artery disease and subsequently went on to have OCT were included in the study. 238 lesions of them divided into derivation and validation dataset at 2:1 ratio (47 patients with 159 lesions and 21 with 79, respectively) were analyzed. A new method was developed to estimate calcium thickness from the maximum CT density within the calcification and compared with calcium thickness measured by OCT. Maximum Calcium density and measured calcium-border CT density had a good correlation with a linear equation of y = 0.58x + 201 (r = 0.892, 95% CI 0.855–0.919, p < 0.001). The estimated calcium thickness derived from this equation showed strong agreement with measured calcium thickness in validation and derivation dataset (r2 = 0.481 and 0.527, 95% CI 0.609–0.842 and 0.497–0.782, p < 0.001 in both, respectively), more accurate than the estimation by full width at half maximum and inflection point method. In conclusion, this novel method provided the estimation of calcium thickness more accurately than conventional methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The all supporting data of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Kubo T, Shimamura K, Ino Y, Yamaguchi T, Matsuo Y, Shiono Y, Taruya A, Nishiguchi T, Shimokado A, Teraguchi I, Orii M, Yamano T, Tanimoto T, Kitabata H, Hirata K, Tanaka A, Akasaka T (2015) Superficial calcium fracture after PCI as assessed by OCT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8:1228–1229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maejima N, Hibi K, Saka K, Akiyama E, Konishi M, Endo M, Iwahashi N, Tsukahara K, Kosuge M, Ebina T, Umemura S, Kimura K (2016) Relationship between thickness of calcium on optical coherence tomography and crack formation after balloon dilatation in calcified plaque requiring rotational atherectomy. Circ J 80:1413–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fujino A, Mintz GS, Matsumura M, Lee T, Kim SY, Hoshino M, Usui E, Yonetsu T, Haag ES, Shlofmitz RA, Kakuta T, Maehara A (2018) A new optical coherence tomography-based calcium scoring system to predict stent underexpansion. EuroIntervention 13:e2182–e2189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Maria GL, Scarsini R, Banning AP (2019) Management of calcific coronary artery lesions: is it time to change our interventional therapeutic approach? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 12:1465–1478

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang M, Matsumura M, Usui E, Noguchi M, Fujimura T, Fall KN, Zhang Z, Nazif TM, Parikh SA, Rabbani LE, Kirtane AJ, Collins MB, Leon MB, Moses JW, Karmpaliotis D, Ali ZA, Mintz GS, Maehara A (2021) Intravascular ultrasound-derived calcium score to predict stent expansion in severely calcified lesions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 14:e010296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fujii K, Kubo T, Otake H, Nakazawa G, Sonoda S, Hibi K, Shinke T, Kobayashi Y, Ikari Y, Akasaka T (2022) Expert consensus statement for quantitative measurement and morphological assessment of optical coherence tomography: update 2022. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 37:248–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saito Y, Kobayashi Y, Fujii K, Sonoda S, Tsujita K, Hibi K, Morino Y, Okura H, Ikari Y, Honye J (2020) Clinical expert consensus document on standards for measurements and assessment of intravascular ultrasound from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 35:1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ota K, Nakanishi R, Hashimoto H, Okamura Y, Watanabe I, Yabe T, Okubo R, Ikeda T (2022) Association between coronary artery calcium score on non-contrast chest computed tomography and all-cause mortality among patients with congestive heart failure. Heart Vessels 37:262–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sadamatsu K, Okutsu M, Sumitsuji S, Kawasaki T, Nakamura S, Fukumoto Y, Tsujita K, Sonoda S, Kobayashi Y, Ikari Y (2021) Practical utilization of cardiac computed tomography for the success in complex coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 36:178–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi JW, Seo JB, Do KH, Choi SI, Lee W, Ko SM, Lee SH, Lee JS, Song JW, Song KS, Lim TH (2006) Comparison of transaxial source images and 3-plane, thin-slab maximal intensity projection images for the diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis with using ECG-gated cardiac CT. Korean J Radiol 7:20–27

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Okutsu M, Horio T, Tanaka H, Akiyama M, Okimoto N, Tsubouchi T, Kawajiri K, Ohashi Y, Sumitsuji S, Ikari Y (2018) Predictive performance of dual modality of computed tomography angiography and intravascular ultrasound for no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary stenting in stable coronary artery disease. Heart Vessels 33:1121–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Steckmann S, Kachelrieß M (2010) Blooming artifact reduction for cardiac CT. IEEE 2030–2035

  14. Chen MY, Steigner ML, Leung SW, Kumamaru KK, Schultz K, Mather RT, Arai AE, Rybicki FJ (2013) Simulated 50 % radiation dose reduction in coronary CT angiography using adaptive iterative dose reduction in three-dimensions (AIDR3D). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:1167–1175

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Nishiyama Y, Tada K, Nishiyama Y, Mori H, Maruyama M, Katsube T, Yamamoto N, Kanayama H, Yamamoto Y, Kitagaki H (2016) Effect of the forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution algorithm on image quality and radiation dose in pediatric cardiac computed tomography. Pediatr Radiol 46:1663–1670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yasaka K, Kamiya K, Irie R, Maeda E, Sato J, Ohtomo K (2016) Metal artefact reduction for patients with metallic dental fillings in helical neck computed tomography: comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D), forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST) and AIDR 3D with single-energy metal artefact reduction (SEMAR). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 45:20160114

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Funama Y, Utsunomiya D, Hirata K, Taguchi K, Nakaura T, Oda S, Kidoh M, Yuki H, Yamashita Y (2017) Improved estimation of coronary plaque and luminal attenuation using a vendor-specific model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm in contrast-enhanced CT coronary angiography. Acad Radiol 24:1070–1078

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Li P, Xu L, Yang L, Wang R, Hsieh J, Sun Z, Fan Z, Leipsic JA (2018) Blooming artifact reduction in coronary artery calcification by a new de-blooming algorithm: initial study. Sci Rep 8:6945

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Monizzi G, Sonck J, Nagumo S, Buytaert D, Van Hoe L, Grancini L, Bartorelli AL, Vanhoenacker P, Simons P, Bladt O, Wyffels E, De Bruyne B, Andreini D, Collet C (2020) Quantification of calcium burden by coronary CT angiography compared to optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 36:2393–2402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Okubo R, Nakanishi R, Dailing C, Yabe T, Noike R, Matsumoto S, Aikawa H, Okamura Y, Hashimoto H, Amano H, Toda M, Maehara A, Budoff MJ, Ikeda T (2020) The relationship between coronary artery calcium density and optical coherence tomography-derived plaque characteristics. Atherosclerosis 311:30–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Takahashi Y, Toba T, Otake H, Fukuyama Y, Nakano S, Matsuoka Y, Tanimura K, Izawa Y, Kawamori H, Kono AK, Fujiwara S, Hirata K (2021) Feasibility of morphological assessment of coronary artery calcification with electrocardiography-gated non-contrast computed tomography: a comparative study with optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 37:1445–1453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Voros S, Rinehart S, Qian Z, Joshi P, Vazquez G, Fischer C, Belur P, Hulten E, Villines TC (2011) Coronary atherosclerosis imaging by coronary CT angiography: current status, correlation with intravascular interrogation and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:537–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U, Kachelriess M, Ropers D, Giesler T, Bautz W, Daniel WG, Kalender WA, Moshage W (2000) Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. Circulation 102:2823–2828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Varma JK, Subramanyan K, Durgan J (2004) Full width at half maximum as a measure of vessel diameter in computed tomography angiography. SPIE 5372:447–454

    Google Scholar 

  25. Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Cury R, Earls JP, Mancini GJ, Nieman K, Pontone G, Raff GL (2014) SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography guidelines committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 8:342–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaw LJ, Blankstein R, Bax JJ, Ferencik M, Bittencourt MS, Min JK, Berman DS, Leipsic J, Villines TC, Dey D, Al’Aref S, Williams MC, Lin F, Baskaran L, Litt H, Litmanovich D, Cury R, Gianni U, van den Hoogen I, van Rosendael AR, Budoff M, Chang HJ, Hecht HE, Feuchtner G, Ahmadi A, Ghoshajra BB, Newby D, Chandrashekhar YS, Narula J (2021) Society of cardiovascular computed tomography/North American society of cardiovascular imaging—expert consensus document on coronary CT imaging of atherosclerotic plaque. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 15:93–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaaki Okutsu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okutsu, M., Mitomo, S., Onishi, H. et al. The estimation of coronary artery calcium thickness by computed tomography angiography based on optical coherence tomography measurements. Heart Vessels 38, 1305–1317 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-023-02286-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-023-02286-1

Keywords

Navigation