Abstract
The pan-Arctic is confronted with air pollution transported from lower latitudes. Observations have shown that aerosols help increase plant photosynthesis through the diffuse radiation fertilization effects (DRFEs). While such DRFEs have been explored at low to middle latitudes, the aerosol impacts on pan-Arctic ecosystems and the contributions by anthropogenic and natural emission sources remain less quantified. Here, we perform regional simulations at 0.2°×0.2° using a well-validated vegetation model (Yale Interactive terrestrial Biosphere, YIBs) in combination with multi-source of observations to quantify the impacts of aerosol DRFEs on the net primary productivity (NPP) in the pan-Arctic during 2001–19. Results show that aerosol DRFEs increase pan-Arctic NPP by 2.19 Pg C (12.8%) yr−1 under clear-sky conditions, in which natural and anthropogenic sources contribute to 8.9% and 3.9%, respectively. Under all-sky conditions, such DRFEs are largely dampened by cloud to only 0.26 Pg C (1.24%) yr−1, with contributions of 0.65% by natural and 0.59% by anthropogenic species. Natural aerosols cause a positive NPP trend of 0.022% yr−1 following the increased fire activities in the pan-Arctic. In contrast, anthropogenic aerosols induce a negative trend of −0.01% yr−1 due to reduced emissions from the middle latitudes. Such trends in aerosol DRFEs show a turning point in the year of 2007 with more positive NPP trends by natural aerosols but negative NPP trends by anthropogenic aerosols thereafter. Though affected by modeling uncertainties, this study suggests a likely increasing impact of aerosols on terrestrial ecosystems in the pan-Arctic under global warming.
摘 要
泛北极地区面临着从低纬度传输而来的空气污染的影响. 观测表明气溶胶能够通过散射辐射施肥效应(DRFEs)促进植被的光合作用. 尽管DRFEs在中低纬度地区已有相关研究, 气溶胶对泛北极生态系统的影响以及对人为和自然气溶胶的相对贡献尚不明确. 在本研究中我们使用一个充分验证的植被模式(耶鲁互动生物圈模式, YIBs)和多源观测数据, 量化了气溶胶的DRFEs对2001–19年期间泛北极地区净初级生产力(NPP)的影响. 结果表明, 晴空条件下气溶胶DRFEs使泛北极地区NPP增加了2.19 Pg C(12.8%)yr−1, 其中自然和人为气溶胶的贡献分别为8.9%和3.9%. 在全天空条件下, 气溶胶的 DRFEs在很大程度上被云层削弱, 仅有0.26 Pg C(1.24%)yr−1的促进效应, 其中自然气溶胶贡献0.65%而人为气溶胶贡献0.59%. 随着泛北极地区野火活动的增加, 自然气溶胶导致NPP呈0.022%yr−1的增长趋势. 相比之下, 由于中纬度地区的排放量减少, 人为气溶胶产生了−0.01%yr−1的NPP降低趋势. 气溶胶DRFEs的趋势转折点出现在2007年, 在此之后自然气溶胶导致的NPP增长趋势更强, 而人为气溶胶导致的NPP增长趋势开始减弱. 尽管受到模型不确定性的影响, 本研究表明在全球变暖背景下, 气溶胶对泛北极地区陆地生态系统的影响可能会越来越大.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statement. Observational data used for this study are available through the references and/or the links provided in the Method section. Simulation data are available upon reasonable request from the authors.
References
Alton, P. B., 2008: Reduced carbon sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems under overcast skies compared to clear skies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148, 1641–1653, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.05.014.
Bellouin, N., and Coauthors, 2020: Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change. Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000660, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000660.
Bey, I., and Coauthors, 2001: Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 106, 23 073–23 095, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000807.
Bian, H. S., and Coauthors, 2021: The response of the Amazon ecosystem to the photosynthetically active radiation fields: Integrating impacts of biomass burning aerosol and clouds in the NASA GEOS Earth system model. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21, 14 177–14 197, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14177-2021.
Bond, T. C., and Coauthors, 2013: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. J. Geo-phys. Res.: Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171.
Breider, T. J., and Coauthors, 2017: Multidecadal trends in aerosol radiative forcing over the Arctic: Contribution of changes in anthropogenic aerosol to Arctic warming since 1980. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 122, 3573–3594, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025321.
Chakraborty, T., and X. Lee, 2021: Large differences in diffuse solar radiation among current-generation reanalysis and satellite-derived products. J. Climate, 34, 6635–6650, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0979.1.
Chakraborty, T., X. Lee, and D. M. Lawrence, 2021: Strong local evaporative cooling over land due to atmospheric aerosols. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 13, e2021MS002491, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002491.
Chakraborty, T., X. Lee, and D. M. Lawrence, 2022: Diffuse radiation forcing constraints on gross primary productivity and global terrestrial evapotranspiration. Earth’s Future, 10, e2022EF002805, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002805.
Chen, M., and Q. L. Zhuang, 2014: Evaluating aerosol direct radiative effects on global terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics from 2003 to 2010. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 66, 21808, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.21808.
Chen, Y., D. M. Romps, J. T. Seeley, S. Veraverbeke, W. J. Riley, Z. A. Mekonnen, and J. T. Randerson, 2021: Future increases in Arctic lightning and fire risk for permafrost carbon. Nature Climate Change, 11, 404–410, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01011-y.
Cirino, G. G., R. A. F. Souza, D. K. Adams, and P. Artaxo, 2014: The effect of atmospheric aerosol particles and clouds on net ecosystem exchange in the Amazon. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14, 6523–6543, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6523-2014.
Donohue, R. J., M. L. Roderick, T. R. McVicar, and G. D. Farquhar, 2013: Impact of CO2 fertilization on maximum foliage cover across the globe’s warm, arid environments. Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 3031–3035, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50563.
Dorrepaal, E., S. Toet, R. S. P. van Logtestijn, E. Swart, M. J. van de Weg, T. V. Callaghan, and R. Aerts, 2009: Carbon respiration from subsurface peat accelerated by climate warming in the subarctic. Nature, 460, 616–619, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08216.
Doughty, C. E., M. G. Flanner, and M. L. Goulden, 2010: Effect of smoke on subcanopy shaded light, canopy temperature, and carbon dioxide uptake in an Amazon rainforest. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 44, GB3015, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003670.
Fridley, J. D., J. S. Lynn, J. P. Grime, and A. P. Askew, 2016: Longer growing seasons shift grassland vegetation towards more-productive species. Nature Climate Change, 6, 865–868, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3032.
Friedl, M. A., D. Sulla-Menashe, B. Tan, A. Schneider, N. Ramankutty, A. Sibley, and X. M. Huang, 2010: MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, 168–182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016.
Friedlingstein, P., and Coauthors, 2020: Global carbon budget 2020. Earth System Science Data, 12, 3269–3340, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020.
Garrett, T. J., and C. F. Zhao, 2006: Increased Arctic cloud longwave emissivity associated with pollution from mid-latitudes. Nature, 440, 787–789, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04636.
Garrett, T. J., C. F. Zhao, and P. C. Novelli, 2010: Assessing the relative contributions of transport efficiency and scavenging to seasonal variability in Arctic aerosol. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 62, 190–196, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2010.00453.x.
Gong, W. M., and Coauthors, 2018: Assessing the impact of shipping emissions on air pollution in the Canadian Arctic and northern regions: Current and future modelled scenarios. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18, 16 653–16 687, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16653-2018.
Graversen, R. G., T. Mauritsen, M. Tjernström, E. Källén, and G. Svensson, 2008: Vertical structure of recent Arctic warming. Nature, 451, 53–56, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06502.
Gu, L. H., D. D. Baldocchi, S. C. Wofsy, J. W. Munger, J. J. Michalsky, S. P. Urbanski, and T. A. Boden, 2003: Response of a deciduous forest to the Mount Pinatubo eruption: Enhanced photosynthesis. Science, 499, 2035–2038, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078366.
Guenther, A. B., X. Jiang, C. L. Heald, T. Sakulyanontvittaya, T. Duhl, L. K. Emmons, and X. Wang, 2012: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): An extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions. Geoscientific Model Development, 5, 1471–1492, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012.
Hemes, K. S., J. Verfaillie, and D. D. Baldocchi, 2020: Wildfire-smoke aerosols lead to increased light use efficiency among agricultural and restored wetland land uses in California’s central valley. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci., 125, e2019JG005380, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005380.
Hirdman, D., and Coauthors, 2010: Long-term trends of black carbon and sulphate aerosol in the Arctic: Changes in atmospheric transport and source region emissions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10, 9351–9368, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9351-2010.
Hoesly, R. M., and Coauthors, 2018: Historical (1750-2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS). Geoscien-tific Model Development, 11, 369–408, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018.
Huang, J. B., and Coauthors, 2017: Recently amplified arctic warming has contributed to a continual global warming trend. Nature Climate Change, 7, 875–879, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0009-5.
Jung, M., M. Reichstein, and A. Bondeau, 2009: Towards global empirical upscaling of FLUXNET eddy covariance observations: Validation of a model tree ensemble approach using a biosphere model. Biogeosciences, 6, 2001–2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2001-2009.
Keppel-Aleks, G., and R. A. Washenfelder, 2016: The effect of atmospheric sulfate reductions on diffuse radiation and photosynthesis in the United States during 1995–2013. Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 9984–9993, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070052.
Law, K. S., and A. Stohl, 2007: Arctic air pollution: Origins and impacts. Science, 315, 1537–1540, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137695.
Lawrence, D. M., and S. C. Swenson, 2011: Permafrost response to increasing Arctic shrub abundance depends on the relative influence of shrubs on local soil cooling versus large-scale climate warming. Environmental Research Letters, 6, 045504, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/045504.
Liu, H., and Coauthors, 2013: Rapid warming accelerates tree growth decline in semi-arid forests of Inner Asia. Global Change Biology, 19, 2500–2510, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12217.
Luo, X. Z., and Coauthors, 2018: Comparison of big-leaf, two-big-leaf, and two-leaf upscaling schemes for evapotranspiration estimation using coupled carbon-water modeling. J. Geo-phys. Res.: Biogeosci., 123, 207–225, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG003978.
Ma, W., J. L. Ding, J. L. Wang, and J. Y. Zhang, 2022: Effects of aerosol on terrestrial gross primary productivity in Central Asia. Atmos. Environ., 288, 119294, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119294.
Mahmood, R., K. von Salzen, A.-L. Norman, M. Gall, and M. Levasseur, 2019: Sensitivity of Arctic sulfate aerosol and clouds to changes in future surface seawater dimethylsulfide concentrations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19, 6419–6435, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6419-2019.
Malavelle, F. F., J. M. Haywood, L. M. Mercado, G. A. Folberth, N. Bellouin, S. Sitch, and P. Artaxo, 2019: Studying the impact of biomass burning aerosol radiative and climate effects on the Amazon rainforest productivity with an Earth system model. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19, 1301–1326, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1301-2019.
Markowicz, K. M., J. Lisok, and P. Xian, 2017: Simulations of the effect of intensive biomass burning in July 2015 on Arctic radiative budget. Atmos. Environ., 171, 248–260, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.015.
McCarty, J. L., and Coauthors, 2021: Reviews and syntheses: Arctic fire regimes and emissions in the 21st century. Biogeo-sciences, 88, 5053–5083, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5053-2021.
McGuire, A. D., and Coauthors, 2009: Sensitivity of the carbon cycle in the Arctic to climate change. Ecological Monographs, 79, 523–555, https://doi.org/10/1890/08-2025.1.
Mercado, L. M., N. Bellouin, S. Sitch, O. Boucher, C. Hunting-ford, M. Wild, and P. M. Cox, 2009: Impact of changes in diffuse radiation on the global land carbon sink. Nature, 458, 1014–1017, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07949.
Monjardino, J., L. Dias, P. Fortes, H. Tente, F. Ferreira, and J. Seixas, 2021: Carbon neutrality pathways effects on air pollutant emissions: The portuguese case. Atmosphere, 12, 324, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12030324.
Moosmüller, H., R. K. Chakrabarty, and W. P. Arnott, 2009: Aerosol light absorption and its measurement: A review. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 110, 844–878, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.035.
O’Sullivan, M., and Coauthors, 2021: Aerosol-light interactions reduce the carbon budget imbalance. Environmental Research Letters, 16, 124072, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac3b77.
Pan, S. F., and Coauthors, 2020: Larger sensitivity of arctic precipitation phase to aerosol than greenhouse gas forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL090452, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090452.
Piao, S., and Coauthors, 2013: Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models for their response to climate variability and to CO2 trends. Global Change Biology, 19, 2117–2132, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12187.
Rap, A., and Coauthors, 2018: Enhanced global primary production by biogenic aerosol via diffuse radiation fertilization. Nature Geoscience, 11, 640–644, https://doi.org/10.1038/s4156-018-0208-3.
Running, S. W., 2006: Is global warming causing more, larger wildfires? Science, 313, 927–928, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130370.
Saugier, B., J. Roy, and H. A. Mooney, 2001: Estimations of global terrestrial productivity: Converging toward a single number?. Terrestrial Global Productivity, J. Roy, B. Saugier, and H. A. Mooney, Eds., Academic Press, 543–557.
Spitters, C. J. T., H. A. J. M. Toussaint, and J. Goudriaan, 1986: Separating the diffuse and direct component of global radiation and its implications for modeling canopy photosynthesis Part I. Components of incoming radiation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 38, 217–229, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(86)90060-2.
Stohl, A., 2006: Characteristics of atmospheric transport into the Arctic troposphere. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 111, D11306, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006888.
Strada, S., and N. Unger, 2016: Potential sensitivity of photosynthesis and isoprene emission to direct radiative effects of atmospheric aerosol pollution. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 66, 4213–4234, https://doi.org/10.5144/cpp-16-4213-2016.
Streets, D. G., and Coauthors, 2009: Anthropogenic and natural contributions to regional trends in aerosol optical depth, 1980–2006. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 4, D00D18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011624.
Tao, M. H., L. L. Wang, L. F. Chen, Z. F. Wang, and J. H. Tao, 2020: Reversal of aerosol properties in Eastern China with rapid decline of anthropogenic emissions. Remote Sensing, 12, 523, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030523.
Thackeray, C. W., and A. Hall, 2019: An emergent constraint on future Arctic sea-ice albedo feedback. Nature Climate Change, 9, 972–978, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0619-1.
Tian, C. G., and Coauthors, 2022: Fire-climate interactions through the aerosol radiative effect in a global chemistry–climate-vegetation model. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22, 12 353–12 366, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12353-2022.
Urban, M., M. Forkel, J. Eberle, C. Hüttich, C. Schmullius, and M. Herold, 2014: Pan-Arctic climate and land cover trends derived from multi-variate and multi-scale analyses (1981-2012). Remote Sensing, 6, 2296–2316, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6032296.
Veraverbeke, S., C. J. F. Delcourt, E. Kukavskaya, M. Mack, X. Walker, T. Hessilt, B. Rogers, and R. C. Scholten, 2021: Direct and longer-term carbon emissions from arctic-boreal fires: A short review of recent advances. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 21, 100277, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COESH.2021.100277.
Vinogradova, A. A., and T. Y. Ponomareva, 2012: Atmospheric transport of anthropogenic impurities to the Russian arctic (1986-2010). Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics, 25, 414–422, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856012060127.
Walker, X. J., and Coauthors, 2019: Increasing wildfires threaten historic carbon sink of boreal forest soils. Nature, 572, 520–523, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1474-y.
Wang, X., and Coauthors, 2021: Intermediate aerosol loading enhances photosynthetic activity of croplands. Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL091893, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091893.
Willis, M. D., W. R. Leaitch, and J. P. D. Abbatt, 2018: Processes controlling the composition and abundance of Arctic aerosol. Rev. Geophys., 56, 621–671, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000602.
Xie, S. C., X. H. Liu, C. F. Zhao, and Y. Y. Zhang, 2013: Sensitivity of CAM5-simulated arctic clouds and radiation to ice nucle-ation parameterization. J. Climate, 26, 5981–5999, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00517.1.
Yang, X. C., C. F. Zhao, Y. K. Yang, and H. Fan, 2021: Longterm multi-source data analysis about the characteristics of aerosol optical properties and types over Australia. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21, 3803–3825, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3803-2021.
Yu, H. B., and Coauthors, 2013: A multimodel assessment of the influence of regional anthropogenic emission reductions on aerosol direct radiative forcing and the role of intercontinental transport. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 118, 700–720, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018148.
Yue, X., and N. Unger, 2015: The Yale Interactive terrestrial Biosphere model version 1.0: Description, evaluation and implementation into NASA GISS ModelE2. Geoscientific Model Development, 8, 2399–2417, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2399-2015.
Yue, X., and N. Unger, 2017: Aerosol optical depth thresholds as a tool to assess diffuse radiation fertilization of the land carbon uptake in China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17, 1329–1342, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1329-2017.
Yue, X., and N. Unger, 2018: Fire air pollution reduces global terrestrial productivity. Nature Communications, 9, 5413, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07921-4.
Yue, X., T. Y. Zhang, and C. L. Shao, 2021: Afforestation increases ecosystem productivity and carbon storage in China during the 2000s. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 296, 108227, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrfarmet.2020.108227.
Yue, X., L. J. Mickley, J. A. Logan, and J. O. Kaplan, 2013: Ensemble projections of wildfire activity and carbonaceous aerosol concentrations over the western United States in the mid-21st century. Atmos. Environ., 77, 767–780, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.003.
Zhang, L. S., C. S. Lee, R. Q. Zhang, and L. F. Chen, 2017: Spatial and temporal evaluation of long term trend (2005-2014) of OMI retrieved NO2 and SO2 concentrations in Henan Province, China. Atmos. Environ., 154, 151–166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.067.
Zhang, Y., and Coauthors, 2021: Disentangling the impacts of anthropogenic aerosols on terrestrial carbon cycle during 1850–2014. Earth’s Future, 9, e2021EF002035, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002035.
Zheng, B., and Coauthors, 2018: Trends in China’s anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18, 14 095–14 111, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018.
Zhou, H., X. Yue, Y. D. Lei, C. G. Tian, Y. M. Ma, and Y. Cao, 2021a: Large contributions of diffuse radiation to global gross primary productivity during 1981–2015. Global Biogeo-chemical Cycles, 35, e2021GB006957, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB006957.
Zhou, H., X. Yue, Y. D. Lei, C. G. Tian, Y. M. Ma, and Y. Cao, 2021b: Aerosol radiative and climatic effects on ecosystem productivity and evapotranspiration. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 19, 100218, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2020.10.006.
Acknowledgements
This work was jointly supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFE0106500) and Jiangsu Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (Grant No. BK20200040).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• We quantified the impacts of aerosol DRFEs on the NPP in the pan-Arctic during 2001–19.
• We distinguished the contributions of natural and anthropogenic emissions to aerosol DRFEs in the pan-Arctic.
• We compared the differences of aerosol DRFEs between all-sky and clear-sky conditions.
Electronic Supplementary Material to
376_2023_2329_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Simulation of the Ecosystem Productivity Responses to Aerosol Diffuse Radiation Fertilization Effects over the Pan-Arctic during 2001–19
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Z., Yue, X., Zhou, H. et al. Simulation of the Ecosystem Productivity Responses to Aerosol Diffuse Radiation Fertilization Effects over the Pan-Arctic during 2001–19. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 41, 84–96 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-023-2329-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-023-2329-x
Key words
- diffuse radiation fertilization effects
- anthropogenic aerosols
- natural aerosols
- pan-Arctic
- net primary productivity