Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships between the limit of predictability and initial error in the uncoupled and coupled lorenz models

  • Published:
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between the limit of predictability and initial error was investigated using two simple chaotic systems: the Lorenz model, which possesses a single characteristic time scale, and the coupled Lorenz model, which possesses two different characteristic time scales. The limit of predictability is defined here as the time at which the error reaches 95% of its saturation level; nonlinear behaviors of the error growth are therefore involved in the definition of the limit of predictability. Our results show that the logarithmic function performs well in describing the relationship between the limit of predictability and initial error in both models, although the coefficients in the logarithmic function were not constant across the examined range of initial errors.

Compared with the Lorenz model, in the coupled Lorenz model—in which the slow dynamics and the fast dynamics interact with each other—there is a more complex relationship between the limit of predictability and initial error. The limit of predictability of the Lorenz model is unbounded as the initial error becomes infinitesimally small; therefore, the limit of predictability of the Lorenz model may be extended by reducing the amplitude of the initial error. In contrast, if there exists a fixed initial error in the fast dynamics of the coupled Lorenz model, the slow dynamics has an intrinsic finite limit of predictability that cannot be extended by reducing the amplitude of the initial error in the slow dynamics, and vice versa. The findings reported here reveal the possible existence of an intrinsic finite limit of predictability in a coupled system that possesses many scales of time or motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benettin, G., L. Galgani, A. Giorgilli, and J. M. Strelcyn, 1980: Lyapunov characteristics exponents for smooth dynamical systems and for Hamiltonian systems; a method for computing all of them. Meccanica, 15, 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boffetta, G., P. Giuliani, G. Paladin, and A. Vulpiani, 1998: An extension of the Lyapunov analysis for the predictability problem. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 3409–3416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. Y., 1989: Estimate of dynamical predictability from NMC DERF experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 1227–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, J. F., 1989: Predictability of the atmosphere. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 6, 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalcher, A., and E. Kalnay, 1987: Error growth and predictability in operational ECMWF forecasts. Tellus A, 39, 474–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, R. Q., and J. P. Li, 2007: Nonlinear finite-time Lyapunov exponent and predictability. Physics Letters A, 364, 396–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, R. Q., G. L. Feng, S. D. Liu, S. K. Liu, S. X. Huang, and Z. T. Fu, 2006: Review of the study of nonlinear atmospheric dynamics in China (2003–2006). Adv. Atmos. Sci., 24, 1077–1085, doi: 10.1007/s00376-007-1077-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckmann, J. P., and D. Ruelle, 1985: Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors. Reviews of Modern Physics, 57, 617–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy, V., 1993: A predictability study of Lorenz’s 28-variable model as a dynamical system. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 2215–2229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leith, C. E., 1971: Atmospheric predictability and twodimensional turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leith, C. E., and R. H. Kraichnan, 1972: Predictability of turbulent flows. J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 1041–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. P., and R. Q. Ding, 2011a: Temporal-spatial distribution of atmospheric predictability limit by local dynamical analogues. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 3265–3283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. P., and R. Q. Ding, 2011b: Relationship between the predictability limit and initial error in chaotic systems. Chaotic Systems, Esteban Tlelo-Cuautle, Ed., InTech Press, 39–50.

  • Lorenz, E. N., 1963: Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E. N., 1965: A study of the predictability of a 28-variable atmospheric model. Tellus, 3, 321–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E. N., 1969a: The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion. Tellus, 21, 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E. N., 1969b: Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring analogues. J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 636–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E. N., 1982: Atmospheric predictability experiments with a large numerical model. Tellus, 34, 505–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E. N., 1996: Predictability: A problem partly solved. Proc. ECMWF Seminar on Predictability, Vol. I, Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metais, O., and M. Lesieur, 1986: Statistical predictability of decaying turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 857–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, M., W. S. Duan, and J. C. Wang, 2002: The predictability problems in numerical weather and climate prediction. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 19, 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohara, D., and H. L. Tanaka, 2001: Logarithmic relation between the initial error and predictability for the barotropic component of the atmosphere. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 79, 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oseledec, V. I., 1968: A multiplicative ergodic theorem: Lyapunov characteristic numbers for dynamical systems. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc., 19, 197–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T. N., 2006: Predictability of weather and climate: From theory to practice. Predictability of Weather and Climate, T. Palmer and R. Hagedorn, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 1–10.

  • Shimada, I., and T. Nagashima, 1979: A numerical approach to ergodic problem of dissipative dynamical systems. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 61, 1605–1616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, A. J., R. Mureau, and T. Petroliagis, 1995: Error growth and estimates of predictability from the ECMWF forecasting system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 121, 1739–1771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Store, R., and J. F. Royer, 1993: Comparison of different error growth formulas and predictability estimation in numerical extended-range forecasts. Ann. Geophys., 11, 296–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, Z., 1991: Estimation of atmospheric predictability by circulation analogs. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119, 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Dool, H. M., 1994: Searching for analogues, how long must we wait? Tellus, 46A, 314–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, A., J. B. Swift, H. L. Swinney, and J. A. Vastano, 1985: Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series. Physica D, 16, 285–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X. J., 2005: Atmospheric stochastic dynamics and predictability. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 63, 806–811. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruiqiang Ding  (丁瑞强).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ding, R., Li, J. Relationships between the limit of predictability and initial error in the uncoupled and coupled lorenz models. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 29, 1078–1088 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-1207-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-1207-8

Key words

Navigation