Abstract
In this paper, we obtain lower and upper bounds for the Gini mean difference for the case of independent and identically distributed random variables based on the information about mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis of the distribution. We also obtain some relationships between the three dispersion measures in the general case. The established results improve some well-known bounds and inequalities. These results are then used to sharpen some inequalities concerning Gini’s index, order statistics and premium principles. Examples demonstrate that the proposed bounds perform much better than the existing ones.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecher H, Beirlant J, Teugels JL (2017) Reinsurance: actuarial and statistical aspects. Wiley, Hoboken
Arnold BC (1980) Distribution-free bounds on the mean of the maximum of a dependent sample. SIAM J Appl Math 38:163–167
Arnold BC (1985) \(P\)-norm bounds on the expectation of the maximum of a possibly dependent sample. J Multivar Anal 17:316–332
Arnold BC, Balakrishnan N (1989) Relations, bounds, and approximations for order statistics, vol 53. Springer, New York
Arnold BC, Groeneveld RA (1979) Bounds on expectations of linear systematic statistics based on dependent samples. Ann Stat 7:220–223
Balakrishnan N, Balasubramanian K (1993) Equivalence of Hartley–David–Gumbel and Papathanasiou bounds and some further remarks. Stat Probab Lett 16:39–41
Balakrishnan N, Rao CR (eds) (1998a) Handbook of statics 16: order statistics: theory & methods. North-Holland, Amstedam
Balakrishnan N, Rao CR (eds) (1998b) Handbook of statistics 17: order statistics: applications. North-Holland, Amstedam
Berrebi ZM, Silber J (1987) Dispersion, asymmetry and the Gini index of inequality. Int Econ Rev 28(2):331–338
Blàzquez LF, Salamanca-Miño B (1999) On Terrel’s characterization of uniform distribution. Stat Pap 40:335–342
Bobkov SG (1999) Isoperimetric and analytic inequalities for log-concave probability measures. Ann Probab 27(4):1903–1921
Cerone P, Dragomir SS (2005) Bounds for the Gini mean difference via the Sonin identity. Comput Math Appl 50:599–609
Cerone P, Dragomir SS (2007) Bounds for the Gini mean difference of continuous distributions defined on finite intervals (I). Appl Math Lett 20:782–789
Chattopadhyay B, De SK (2016) Estimation of Gini index within pre-specified error bound. Econometrics 4:30
Dang X, Sang H, Weatherall L (2019) Gini covariance matrix and its affine equivariant version. Stat Pap 60(3):291–316
David HA, Nagaraja HN (2003) Order statistics, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Denneberg D (1990) Premium calculation: why standard deviation should be replaced by absolute deviation. ASTIN Bull 20:181–190
Dorfman R (1979) A formula for the Gini coefficient. Rev Econ Stat 61(1):146–149
Eisenberg B (2015) The multivariate Gini ratio. Stat Probab Lett 96:292–298
Furman E, Wang R, Zitikis R (2017) Gini-type measures of risk and variability: Gini shortfall, capital allocation and heavy-tailed risks. J Bank Financ 83:70–84
Furman E, Kye Y, Su J (2019) Computing the Gini index: a note. Econ Lett 185:108753
Gastwirth J (1972) The estimation of the Lorenz curve and Gini index. Rev Econ Stat 54:306–316
Gastwirth JL, Glauberman M (1976) The interpolation of the Lorenz curve and Gini index from grouped data. Econometrica 44:479–483
Gini C (1912) Variabilitá e Metabilitá, contributo allo studia della distribuzioni e relationi statistiche. Studi Econ-Gicenitrici dell’Univ. di Coglani 3:1–158
Giorgi GM, Gigliarano C (2017) The Gini concentration index: a review of the inference literature. J Econ Surv 31:1130–1148
Goovaerts MJ, De Vijlder FE, Haezendonck J (1984) Insurance premiums: theory and applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Gumbel EJ (1954) The maxima of the mean largest value and of the range. Ann Math Stat 25:76–84
Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Polya G (1952) Inequalities, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hartley HO, David HA (1954) Universal bounds for mean range and extreme observation. Ann Math Stat 25:85–99
Haye RL, Zizler P (2019) The Gini mean difference and variance. Metron 77:43–52
Hildebrand DK (1971) Kurtosis measures bimodality? Am Stat 25(1):42–43
Hu TZ, Chen H (2020) On a family of coherent measures of variability. Insur Math Econ 95:173–182
Johnson NL, Kotz S, Balakrishnan N (1995) Continuous univariate distributions-volume 2, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Kaas R, Goovaerts MJ, Dhaene J, Denuit M (2008) Modern actuarial risk theory. Springer, Berlin
Kendall MG, Stuart A (1963) The advanced theory of statistics, vol I. Macmillan Publishing, New York
Liang X, Wang R, Young R (2022) Optimal insurance to maximize RDEU under adistortion–deviation premium principle. Insur Math Econ 104:35–59
Masaki Y, Hanasaki N, Takahashi K, Hijioka Y (2014) Global-scale analysis on future changes in flow regimes using Gini and Lorenz asymmetry coefficients. Water Resour Res 50:4054–4078
Mitrinović DS, Pečarić JE, Fink AM (1993) Classical and new inequahties and analysis. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
Moors JJA (1986) The meaning of kurtosis: Darlington reexamined. Am Stat 40:283–284
Papathanasiou V (1990) Some characterizations of distributions based on order statistics. Stat Probab Lett 9:145–147
Sen PK (1986) The Gini coefficient and poverty indexes: some reconciliations. J Am Stat Assoc 81:1050–1057
Soares TC, Fernandes EA, Toyoshima SH (2018) The CO2 emission Gini index and the environmental efficiency: an analysis for 60 leading world economies. Economia 19:266–277
Wang Q, Wang R, Wei Y (2020) Distortion riskmetrics on general spaces. ASTIN Bull 50(3):827–851
Xu K (2007) \(U\)-statistics and their asymptotic results for some inequality and poverty measures. Economet Rev 26(5):567–577
Yitzhaki S, Schechtman E (2013) The Gini methodology—a primer on a statistical methodology. Springer, New York
Young VR (2014) Premium principles. Wiley, Hoboken
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Professor Werner G. Müller, the Editor-in-Chief, and the two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this manuscript which led to this improved version. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12071251).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
For the convenience of readers and for making the paper self-contained, we list the following inequalities.
Inequality 105 in Hardy et al. (1952): If \(\psi \) and \(\chi \) are continuous, positive, and strictly monotonic, then \(\psi ^{-1}\{\psi (\sum a)\}\ge \chi ^{-1}\{\chi (\sum a)\}\) whenever (1) \(\psi \) and \(\chi \) vary in opposite directions, or (2) \(\psi \) and \(\chi \) vary in the same direction and \(\chi /\psi \) is monotonic.
Grüss inequality (Cerone and Dragomir (2007)): If g and h are integrable on [a, b] and \(m\le g(x)\le M, n\le h(x)\le N\) for \(a.e.\; x\in [a,b]\), then
Sonin identity (Mitrinović et al. (1993), p. 246): If g and h are Lebesgue integrable on [a, b], \(\gamma \in \mathbb {R}\), then
Korkine identity (Mitrinović et al. (1993), p. 242): If g and h are Lebesgue integrable on [a, b], then
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yin, X., Balakrishnan, N. & Yin, C. Bounds for Gini’s mean difference based on first four moments, with some applications. Stat Papers 64, 2081–2100 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-022-01374-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-022-01374-0