Skip to main content
Log in

Pretest and shrinkage estimation of the regression parameter vector of the marginal model with multinomial responses

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) approach has become a popular method that is applied for correlated categorical multinomial responses data in clinical trials and other biomedical experiments. GEEs estimates of the marginal regression parameter vector are consistent. In this article, we propose the pretest, shrinkage, and positive shrinkage estimators for the regression vector of the marginal model with multinomial responses. The array of estimators are compared analytically via their asymptotic quadratic risks, and numerically via their simulated relative efficiencies. We apply the proposed estimation technique to two real data examples and employed a bootstrapping approach to computing the bootstrapping mean squared error of the estimators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed SE (1997) Improved \(R\)-estimation of regression coefficients. J. Stat. Res 31(1):53–73

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed SE (1998) Improved pretest nonparametric estimation in a multivariate regression model. Commun Stat Theory Methods 27(10):2391–2421

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed SE (2014) Penalty, shrinkage and pretest strategies. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed SE, Yüzbaş B (2016) Big data analytics: integrating penalty strategies. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag 11(2):105–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed SE, Yüzbaş B (2017) High dimensional data analysis: integrating submodels-big and complex data analysis: methodologies and applications. Springer, New York, pp 285–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed SE, Hussein AA, Sen PK (2006) Risk comparison of some shrinkage M-estimators in linear models. J Nonparametr Stat 18(4–6):401–415

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed SE, Doksum KA, Hossain S, You J (2007) Shrinkage, pretest and absolute penalty estimators in partially linear models. Aust N Z J Stat 49(4):435–454

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Momani M (2013) Shrinkage and penalty estimation for some spatial regression models. PhD thesis, University of Windsor, Canada

  • Al-Momani M, Dawod AB (2022) A model selection and post selection to improve the estimation of the ARCH model. J Risk Financ Manag 15(4)

  • Al-Momani M, Hussein AA, Ahmed SE (2017) Penalty and related estimation strategies in the spatial error model. Stat Neerl 71(1):4–30

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Momani M, Ahmed SE, Hussein AA (2020) Efficient estimation strategies for spatial moving average model. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on management science and engineering management. Springer, New York, pp. 520–543

  • Anestis T (2016) Simulating correlated binary and multinomial responses under marginal model specification: the SimCorMultRes package. R J 8(2):79–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Angelo GM, Lazar NA, Zhou G, Eddy WF, Morris JC, Sheline YI (2012) Bootstrapping GEE models for fMRI regional connectivity. Neuroimage 63(4):1890–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta G, Ghosh M (2012) Small area shrinkage estimation. Stat Sci 27(1):95–114

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Davis CS (1991) Semi-parametric and non-parametric methods for the analysis of repeated measurements with applications to clinical trials. Stat Med 12:1959–1980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawod ABA, Al-Momani M, Abbasi SA (2018) On efficient estimation strategies in monitoring of linear profiles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:3977–3991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin JW, Hilbe JM (2012) Generalized estimating equations, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hojsgaard S, Halekoh U, Yan J (2006) The R package Geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Stat Softw 15(2):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey RW, Kent AL (2015) Modeling Binary correlated responses using SAS, SPSS and R. Chapter 1. Introduction to binary logistic regression. Springer, New York, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang K-Y, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73(1):13–22

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitz SR, Kim K, Zhao L (1994) Analysis of repeated categorical data using generalized estimating equations. Stat Med 13(11):1149–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisawadi S, AhmedS E, Reangsephet O (2021) Post estimation and prediction strategies in negative binomial regression model. Int J Model Simul 41(6):463–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muth C, Bales KL, Hinde K, Maninger N, Mendoza SP, Ferrer E (2016) Alternative models for small samples in psychological research: applying linear mixed effects models and generalized estimating equations to repeated measures data. Educ Psychol Measur 76(1):64–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nkurunziza S, Al-Momani M, Lin EYY (2016) Shrinkage and LASSO strategies in high-dimensional heteroscedastic models. Commun Stat 45(15):4454–4470

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Owusu-Darko I, Adu IK, Frempong N (2014) Application of generalized estimating equation (GEE) model on students’ academic performance. Appl Math Sci 8(68):3359–3374

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo MC, Alonso R (2014) GEEs for repeated categorical responses based on generalized residuals. J Stat Comput Simul 84(2):344–359

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh AK, Ehsanes Md (2006) Theory of preliminary test and Stein-type estimation with applications. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Supranee L, Muhammad KAS, Ahmed SE (2016) Model selection and post estimation based on a pretest for logistic regression models. J Stat Comput Simul 86(17):3495–3511

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Touloumis A (2015) R package multgee: a generalized estimating equations solver for multinomial responses. J Stat Softw 64(8):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touloumis A, Agresti A, Kateri M (2013) GEE for multinomial responses using a local odds ratios parameterization. Biometrics 69(3):633–640

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M (2014) Generalized estimating equations in longitudinal data analysis: a review and recent developments. Adv Stat

  • Xiaoli G, Ahmed SE, Yang F (2017) Post selection shrinkage estimation for high-dimensional data analysis. Appl Stoch Model Bus Ind 33(2):97–120

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals for the support of this research is under Reference Number SB181029. The authors are very grateful to the reviewers for their valuable comments and recommendations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marwan Al-Momani.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Momani, M., Riaz, M. & Saleh, M.F. Pretest and shrinkage estimation of the regression parameter vector of the marginal model with multinomial responses. Stat Papers 64, 2101–2117 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-022-01372-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-022-01372-2

Keywords

Navigation