Abstract
Visual cues commonly aid solitary foraging ants. Specifically, foragers can use the skyline where terrestrial landmarks meet the sky. Foraging ants show a remarkable affinity to retain these terrestrial cues, developing lifelong memories of the nest site panorama. Here we explore foragers’ ability to retain skyline cues of resource locations at some distance from the nest through experiments with artificial skylines erected around a resource location. We also tested the foragers’ memories of one skyline at several time points after the skyline was replaced by a different one. During retention testing, foragers appear able to retain robust memories of these skylines over periods (5 days) that surpass their average life span. Exposure to the nest panorama during these periods did not interfere with navigational performance at the distant skyline. Foragers in the replacement experiment initially oriented correctly to both skylines. Thereafter, the foragers’ headings in tests with the first skyline gradually shifted away from the correct homeward direction. We argue that new skyline memories cause retroactive interference in the retention of previously learned skylines. Skyline memories may compete during memory retrieval, or may be retrieved in association with context cues present in the current testing paradigm such as vector length.
References
Baddeley B, Graham P, Husbands P, Philippides A (2012) A model of ant route navigation driven by scene familiarity. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002336
Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic Press, New York
Beugnon G, Lachaud JP, Chagné P (2005) Use of long-term stored vector information in the neotropical ant Gigantiops destructor. J Insect Behav 18:415–432
Cheng K (2005) Context cues eliminate retroactive interference effects in honeybees Apis mellifera. J Exp Biol 208:1019–1024
Cheng K, Wignall AE (2006) Honeybees (Apis mellifera) holding on to memories: response competition causes retroactive interference effects. Anim Cogn 9:141
Cheng K, Narendra A, Wehner R (2006) Behavioral ecology of odometric memories in desert ants: acquisition, retention and integration. Behav Ecol 17:227–235
Colborn M, Ahmad-Annuar A, Fauria K, Collett TS (1999) Contextual modulation of visuomotor associationsin bumble-bees (Bombus terrestris). Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2413–2418
Collett M (2010) How desert ants use a visual landmark for guidance along a habitual route. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:11638–11643
Collett M, Collett TS (2000) How do insects use path integration for their navigation? Biol Cybern 83(3):245–259
Collett TS, Collett M (2002) Memory use in insect visual navigation. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:542–552
Collett TS, Fauria K, Dale K, Baron J (1997) Places and patterns – a study of context learning in honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 181:343–353
Collett TS, Kelber A (1988) The retrieval of visuo-spatial memories by honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 163:145–150
Collett TS, Zeil J (1996) Flights of learning. Curr Dir Psychol 5:149–155
Collett TS, Collett M, Wehner R (2001) The guidance of desert ants by extended landmarks. J Exp Biol 204:1635–1639
Collett TS, Fauria K, Dale K (2003) Contextual cues and insect navigation. In: Jeffery KC (ed) The neurobiology of spatial behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 67–82
Collett TS, Graham P, Harris RA, Hempel-de-Ibarra N (2006) Navigational memories in ants and bees: memory retrieval when selecting and following routes. Adv Stud Behav 36:123–172
Differt D, Möller R (2015) Insect models of illumination-invariant skyline extraction from UV and green channels. J Theor Biol 380:444–462
Dyer FC, Gill M, Sharbowski J (2002) Motivation and vector navigation in honey bees. Naturwissenschaften 89:262–264
Fleischmann PN, Christian M, Müller VL, Rössler W, Wehner R (2016) Ontogeny of learning walks and the acquisition of landmark information in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. J Exp Biol. doi:10.1242/jeb.140459
Graham P, Cheng K (2009) Which portion of the natural panorama is used for view-based navigation in the Australian desert ant? J Comp Physiol A 195:681–689
Kohler M, Wehner R (2005) Idiosyncratic route-based memories in desert ants, Melophorus bagoti: how do they interact with path-integration vectors? Neurobiol Learn Mem 1:1–12
Kollmeier T, Röben F, Schenck W, Möller R (2007) Spectral contrasts for landmark navigation. J Opt Soc Am A 24:1–10
Koltermann R (1969) Lern- und vergessensprozesse bei der honigbiene – aufgezeigt anhand von duftdressuren [Data on processes of learning and forgetting, gained from scent training of honey-bees]. Z vergl Physiol 63:310–334
Koltermann R (1971) 24-Std-Periodik in der Langzeiterrinerung an Duftund Farbsignale bei der Honigbiene [Circadian memory rhythm after scent and colour training with honey-bees]. Z vergl Physiol 75:49–68
Legge ELG, Spentch ML, Cheng KC (2010) Not using the obvious: desert atns, Melophorus bagoti, learn local vectors but not beacons in an arena. Anim Cogn 13:849–860
Lehrer M (1993) Why do bees turn back and look? J Comp Physiol A 172:544–563
Lehrer M (1996) Small-scale navigation in the honeybee: active acquisition of visual information about the goal. J Exp Biol 199:253–261
Möller R (2002) Insects could exploit UV-green contrast for landmark navigation. J Theor Biol 214:619–631
Möller R (2012) A model of ant navigation based on visual prediction. J Theor Biol 305:118–130
Mote MI, Wehner R (1980) Functional characteristics of photoreceptors in the compound eye and ocellus of the desert ant, Cataglyphis bicolor. J Comp Physiol A 137:63–71
Müller M, Wehner R (1994) The hidden spiral: systematic search and path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. J Comp Physiol A 175:525
Müller M, Wehner R (2010) Path integration provides a scaffold for landmark learning in desert ants. Curr Biol 20:1368–1371
Muser B, Sommer S, Wolf H, Wehner R (2005) Foraging ecology of the thermophilic Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti. Aust J Zool 53:301–311
Narendra A (2007) Homing strategies of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti II. Interaction of the path integrator with visual cue information. J Exp Biol 210:1804–1812
Narendra A, Cheng K, Wehner R (2007a) Acquiring, retaining and integrating memories of the outbound distance in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. J Exp Biol 210:570–577
Narendra A, Si A, Sulikowski D, Cheng K (2007b) Learning, retention and coding of nest-associated visual cues by the Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1543–1553
Narendra A, Gourmaud S, Zeil J (2013) Mapping the navigational knowledge of individually foraging ants, Myrmecia croslandi. Proc R Soc B 280:20130683
Nicholson DJ, Judd SPD, Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1999) Learning walks and landmark guidance in wood ants (Formica rufa). J Exp Biol 202:1831–1838
Philippides A, Baddeley B, Cheng K, Graham P (2011) How might ants use panoramic views for route navigation? J Exp Biol 214:445–451
Rosengren R (1971) Route fidelity, visual memory and recruitment behaviour in foraging wood ants of the genus Formica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Acta Zool Fenn 133:10105
Schultheiss P, Cheng K (2011) Finding the nest: inbound searching behaviour in the Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti. Anim Behav 81(5):1031–1038
Schultheiss P, Nooten SS (2013) Foraging patterns and strategies in an Australian desert ant. Austral Ecol 38:942–951
Schultheiss P, Wystrach A, Scwarz S, Tack A, Delor J, Nooten SS, Bibost AL, Freas CA, Cheng K (2016) Crucial role of ultraviolet light for desert ants in determining direction from the terrestrial panorama. Anim Behav 115:19–28
Sommer S, von Beeren C, Wehner R (2008) Multiroute memories in desert ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:317–322
Stürzl W, Zeil J, Boeddeker N, Hemmi JM (2016) How wasps acquire and use views for homing. Curr Biol 26:470–482
Wehner R (2003) Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks. J Comp Physiol A 189:579–588
Wehner R (2008) The desert ant’s navigational toolkit: procedural rather than positional knowledge. Navigation 55:101–114
Wehner R, Harkness RD, Schimd-Hempel P (1983) Foraging strategies in individually searching ants, cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Fischer, Stuttgart
Wehner R, Michel B, Antonsen P (1996) Visual navigation in insects: coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. J Exp Biol 199:129–140
Wystrach A, Beugnon G, Cheng K (2011a) Landmarks or panoramas: what do navigating ants attend to for guidance? Front Zool 8:21
Wystrach A, Schwarz S, Schultheiss P, Beugnon G, Cheng K (2011b) Views, landmarks, and routes: how do desert ants negotiate an obstacle course? J Comp Physiol A 197:167–179
Wystrach A, Beugnon G, Cheng K (2012) Ants might use different view-matching strategies on and off the route. J Exp Biol 215:44–55
Wystrach A, Mangan M, Philippides A, Graham P (2013) Snapshots in ants? new interpretations of paradigmatic experiments. J Exp Biol 216:1766–1770
Wystrach A, Schwarz S, Schultheiss P, Baniel A, Cheng K (2014) Multiple sources of celestial compass information in the central Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. J Comp Physiol A 200:1–11
Zar JH (1998) Biostatisical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs
Zeil J (1993) Orientation flights of solitary wasps (Cerceris, Sphecidae, Hymenoptera). I. Description of flight. J Comp Physiol A 172:189–205
Zeil J, Kelber A, Voss R (1996) Structure and function of learning flights in bees and wasps. J Exp Biol 199:245–252
Zeil J, Narendra A, Stürzl W (2014) Looking and homing: how displaced ants decide where to go. Phil Trans R Soc B 369:20130034
Ziegler PE, Wehner R (1997) Time-courses of memory decay in vector-based and landmark-based systems of navigation in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. J Comp Physiol A 181:13–20
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a grant from the Australian Research Council (DP150101172). We thank the Centre of Appropriate Technology for access to the field site.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Experiments conceived and designed: CAF and KC. Collected and analyzed data: CAF and CW. Drafted and revised paper: CAF and KC.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics statement
All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freas, C.A., Whyte, C. & Cheng, K. Skyline retention and retroactive interference in the navigating Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti . J Comp Physiol A 203, 353–367 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-017-1174-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-017-1174-8