Skip to main content
Log in

Is a continuous rational social aggregation impossible on continuum spaces?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a global topological setting for the social choice theory on continuum spaces of alternatives, in contrast to the local differentiable setting of Chichilnisky. Chichilnisky proved that a rational continuous social choice must be discontinuous in her setting. Our paper revisits her theorem to trace the source of this discontinuity. We find that the discontinuity is irrelevant to social aggregation, per se. The main theorem states that there exist a number of continuous social utility maps which are anonymous and satisfy the Pareto condition. As a corollary, we show that there exist corresponding continuous social welfare functions, if singularity is not separated from regular preferences in social preference topology. This extends the possibility result of Jonnes-Zhang-Simpson on linear preferences, to the general ones. The notion of singularity of preferences, relative to the given mathematical structure of an alternative space, is carefully studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow K (1951) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baigent N (1987) Preference proximity and anonymous social choice. Quart J Econ 102: 161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky G (1980) Social choice and the topology of spaces of preferences. Adv Math 37: 165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky G (1982) Social aggregation rules and continuity. Quart J Econ 97(2): 337–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HJ, Huang WH (2008) Existence of continuous rational social choices on infinite discrete alternatives (to appear)

  • Debreu G (1972) Smooth preferences. Econometrica 23: 603–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang WH (1996) Singularity in social choice theory, Technical Report. National Taiwan University, pp 1–64

  • Huang WH (2004) Is proximity preservation rational in social choice theory?. Soc Choice Welf 23: 315–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones M, Zhang J, Simpson G (2003) Aggregation of utility and social choice: a topological characterization. J Math Psychol 47: 545–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly J (1955) General topology. Van Nostrand, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Collel A, Whiston W, Green J (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1995) Rationality and social choice. Am Econ Rev 85(1): 1–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wu-Hsiung U. Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, WH.U. Is a continuous rational social aggregation impossible on continuum spaces?. Soc Choice Welf 32, 635–686 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0342-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0342-8

Keywords

Navigation