Abstract
This paper provides a global topological setting for the social choice theory on continuum spaces of alternatives, in contrast to the local differentiable setting of Chichilnisky. Chichilnisky proved that a rational continuous social choice must be discontinuous in her setting. Our paper revisits her theorem to trace the source of this discontinuity. We find that the discontinuity is irrelevant to social aggregation, per se. The main theorem states that there exist a number of continuous social utility maps which are anonymous and satisfy the Pareto condition. As a corollary, we show that there exist corresponding continuous social welfare functions, if singularity is not separated from regular preferences in social preference topology. This extends the possibility result of Jonnes-Zhang-Simpson on linear preferences, to the general ones. The notion of singularity of preferences, relative to the given mathematical structure of an alternative space, is carefully studied.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow K (1951) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York
Baigent N (1987) Preference proximity and anonymous social choice. Quart J Econ 102: 161–169
Chichilnisky G (1980) Social choice and the topology of spaces of preferences. Adv Math 37: 165–176
Chichilnisky G (1982) Social aggregation rules and continuity. Quart J Econ 97(2): 337–352
Chen HJ, Huang WH (2008) Existence of continuous rational social choices on infinite discrete alternatives (to appear)
Debreu G (1972) Smooth preferences. Econometrica 23: 603–615
Huang WH (1996) Singularity in social choice theory, Technical Report. National Taiwan University, pp 1–64
Huang WH (2004) Is proximity preservation rational in social choice theory?. Soc Choice Welf 23: 315–332
Jones M, Zhang J, Simpson G (2003) Aggregation of utility and social choice: a topological characterization. J Math Psychol 47: 545–556
Kelly J (1955) General topology. Van Nostrand, New York
Mas-Collel A, Whiston W, Green J (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
Sen A (1995) Rationality and social choice. Am Econ Rev 85(1): 1–24
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, WH.U. Is a continuous rational social aggregation impossible on continuum spaces?. Soc Choice Welf 32, 635–686 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0342-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0342-8