Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating the effective viscosity of bubble suspensions in oscillatory shear flows by means of ultrasonic spinning rheometry

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have proposed a novel methodology using ultrasonic velocity profiling to estimate the effective viscosity of bubble suspensions that are accompanied by non-equilibrium bubble deformations in periodic shear flows. The methodology was termed “ultrasonic spinning rheometry” and validated on measurement of the effective viscosity of particle suspensions that has a semi-empirical formula giving good estimation of the actual viscosity. The results indicated that the proposed technique is valid for particle volume fractions below 3.0 %. Applying this to bubble suspensions suggested that the effective value of temporal variations in the capillary number, \(\hbox{Ca}_{\rm rms}\), is an important indicator to distinguish regimes in estimating the effective viscosity: Unsteady flows having larger \(\hbox{Ca}_{\rm rms}\) number than the critical capillary number for the deformation of bubbles are categorized into Regime 2 that includes both highly unsteady conditions and large steady deformation of bubbles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ceccio SL (2010) Friction drag reduction of external flows with bubbles and gas injection. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 42:183–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi SJ, Schowalter WR (1975) Rheological properties of nondilute suspensions of deformable particles. Phys Fluids 18:420–427

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Derakhshandeh B, Vlassopoulos D (2012) Thixotropy, yielding and ultrasonic Doppler velocimetry in pulp fiber suspensions. Rheol Acta 51:201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein A (1906) Eine neue Bestimung der Molekuldimensionen. Ann Phys 19:289–306

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Feng ZC, Leal LG (1997) Nonlinear bubble dynamics. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 29:201–243

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel NA, Acrivos A (1970) The constitutive equation for a dilute emulsion. J Fluid Mech 44:65–78

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez FR et al (2010) Rheo-PIV analysis of the slip flow of a metallocene linear low-density polyethylene melt. Rheol Acta 49:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez JP et al (2012) Rheo-PIV of a yield-stress fluid in a capillary with slip at the wall. Rheol Acta 51:937–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinch EJ, Acrivos A (1980) Long slender drops in a simple shear flow. J Fluid Mech 98:305–328

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kuwagi K, Ozoe H (1999) Three-dimensional oscillation of bubbly flow in a vertical cylinder. Intl J Multiphase Flow 25:175–182

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb H (1932) Hydrodynamics, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellin EW, Manga M (2005) Bubble suspension rheology and implications for conduit flow. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 143:205–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellin EW, Mader HM, Wilson SDR (2002) The constitutive equation and flow dynamics of bubbly magmas. Gephys Res Lett 29:2170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Tryggvason G (2007) Effect of bubble size in turbulent bubbly downflow in a vertical channel. Chem Eng Sci 62:3008–3018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney M (1951) The viscosity of a concentrated suspension of spherical particles. J Colloid Sci 6:162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murai Y, Oiwa H (2008) Increase of effective viscosity in bubbly liquids from transient bubble deformation. Fluid Dyn Res 40:565–575

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rust AC, Manga M (2002a) Bubble shapes and orientations in Low Re simple shear flow. J Colloid Interface Sci 249:476–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust AC, Manga M (2002b) Effects of bubble deformation on the viscosity dilute suspensions. J Non Newton Fluid Mech 104:53–63

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shiratori T et al (2013) Development of ultrasonic visualizer for capturing the characteristics of viscoelastic fluids. J Vis 16:275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeda Y (ed) (2012) Ultrasonic Doppler velocity profiler for fluid flow. Springer, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeda Y (1995) Instantaneous velocity profile measurement by ultrasonic Doppler method. JSME Int J Ser B 38:8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor GI (1932) The viscosity of a fluid containing small drops of another fluid. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 138:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokuhiro A et al (1998) Turbulent flow past a bubble and an ellipsoid using shadow-image and PIV technique. Int J Multiph Flow 24:1383–1406

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vand V (1948) Viscosity of solutions and suspensions: I theory. J Phys Chem 52:277–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SQ et al (2011) Homogeneous shear, wall slip, and shear banding of entangled polymeric liquids in simple-shear rheometry: a roadmap of nonlinear rheology. Macromolecules 44:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund J, Standing M (2008) Application of in-line ultrasound Doppler-based UVP–PD rheometry method to concentrated model and industrial suspensions. Flow Meas Instrum 19:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 24246033. The authors express thanks for this support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Tasaka.

Appendix

Appendix

Variable separation as \(u_{\theta }(r, t) = F(t)G(r)\) modified Eq. (10) into two ordinal differential equations,

$$ F^{\prime } + \gamma F = 0, $$
(15)
$$ G^{{\prime \prime }} + \frac{1}{r}G^{\prime } + \left( {\beta ^{2} - \frac{1}{{r^{2} }}} \right)G = 0,\quad \beta ^{2} = \frac{\gamma }{\nu }, $$
(16)

with connecting parameter \(\gamma \). By variable transformation of \(\zeta = \beta r\), Eq. (16) can be assumed as Bessel differential equation with \(n = 1\),

$$ \frac{{\hbox{d}}^2 G}{{\hbox{d}} \zeta ^2} + \frac{1}{\zeta } \frac{{\hbox{d}}G}{{\hbox{d}}\zeta } + \left( 1-\frac{n^2}{\zeta ^2} \right) G = 0.$$
(17)

The general solution of this equation is given as a linear combination of Bessel function of first kind \(J_n\) and second kind \(Y_n\). To satisfy the boundary conditions, \(u_{\theta }(r=R, t) = U\sin \omega t = {\rm Im}[U\exp (i\omega t)]\) and \(u_{\theta }(r=0, t) = 0\), the solution should be

$$G(r) = C J_1(\beta r), \quad J_1(\beta r) = \sum _{m=0}^{\infty } \frac{(-1)^m}{m!(m+1)!} \left( \frac{\beta r}{2} \right) ^{2m+1},$$
(18)

where \(C\) is arbitrary constant. Assuming \(F(t) = B\exp (i\omega t)\) as the solution of Eq. (15) with arbitrary constant \(B\) gives \(\gamma = -i\omega \). Then, \(\beta \) is determined as

$$ \beta ^{2} = \frac{\gamma }{\nu } = - i\frac{\omega }{\nu },\quad \beta \pm ( - 1 + i)k,\quad k = \sqrt {\frac{\omega }{{2\nu }}} . $$

We adopt \(\beta = (-1+i)k\) to represent the real phenomenon. Finally, \(u_{\theta }(r, t)\) is given as the imaginary part of the combined solution between \(F(t)\) and \(G(r)\) as

$$\begin{aligned} u_{\theta }(r, t)&= \frac{U}{\varPhi _R^2 + \varPsi _R^2} \left[ (\varPhi \varPhi _R + \varPsi \varPsi _R)\sin \omega t \right. \nonumber \\&\quad \left. + (\varPhi _R \varPsi - \varPhi \varPsi _R) \cos \omega t \right] . \end{aligned}$$
(19)

Here, the \(\varPhi (r)\), \(\varPsi (r)\), \(\varPhi _R\), \(\varPsi _R\) are, respectively, real and imaginary part of \(J_1(r)\) and \(J_1(r=R)\), and given in series as

$$ \varPhi (r) = \sum\limits_{{m = 0}}^{\infty } {\phi _{m} } (r),\quad \varPhi _{R} = \sum\limits_{{m = 0}}^{\infty } {\phi _{m} } (r = R), $$
(20)
$$\varPsi (r) = \sum\limits_{{m = 0}}^{\infty } {\varPsi_{m} } (r),\;\;\varPsi $$
(21)

where

$$\begin{aligned} \phi _m(r)&= \frac{2^m}{m!(m+1)!} \left( \frac{kr}{2} \right) ^{2m+1}f_m, \nonumber \\&\ \quad f_m = {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} (-1)^{(m + 2)/2}&{}: m = \text{even}\,\text{number}\\ (-1)^{(m + 1)/2}&{}: m = \text{odd}\,\text{number}\\ \end{array}\right. }, \end{aligned}$$
(22)
$$ \begin{aligned} \psi _{m} (r) & = \frac{{2^{m} }}{{m!(m + 1)!}}\left( {\frac{{kr}}{2}} \right)^{{2m + 1}} g_{m} , \\ g_{m} & {\text{ = }}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {( - 1)^{{m/2}} } \hfill & {:m = {\text{even}}\,{\text{umber}}} \hfill \\ {( - 1)^{{(m + 1)/2}} } \hfill & {:m = {\text{odd}}\,{\text{number}}} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right. \\ \end{aligned} $$
(23)

Phase delay of the oscillation propagating in the fluid layer, \(\varTheta (r)\), in the form of

$$ u_{\theta }(r, t) = UA(r) \sin [\omega t + \varTheta (r)] $$

is given as

$$ \varTheta (r) = \tan ^{-1} \frac{\varPhi _R \varPsi (r) - \varPhi (r) \varPsi _R}{\varPhi (r) \varPhi _R + \varPsi (r) \varPsi _R}. $$
(24)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tasaka, Y., Kimura, T. & Murai, Y. Estimating the effective viscosity of bubble suspensions in oscillatory shear flows by means of ultrasonic spinning rheometry. Exp Fluids 56, 1867 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1867-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1867-5

Keywords

Navigation