Skip to main content
Log in

Passive flow control by membrane wings for aerodynamic benefit

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The coupling of passive structural response of flexible membranes with the flow over them can significantly alter the aerodynamic characteristic of simple flat-plate wings. The use of flexible wings is common throughout biological flying systems inspiring many engineers to incorporate them into small engineering flying systems. In many of these systems, the motion of the membrane serves to passively alter the flow over the wing potentially resulting in an aerodynamic benefit. In this study, the aerodynamic loads and the flow field for a rigid flat-plate wing are compared to free trailing-edge membrane wings with two different pre-tensions at a chord-based Reynolds number of approximately 50,000. The membrane was silicon rubber with a scalloped free trailing edge. The analysis presented includes load measurements from a sting balance along with velocity fields and membrane deflections from synchronized, time-resolved particle image velocimetry and digital image correlation. The load measurements demonstrate increased aerodynamic efficiency and lift, while the synchronized flow and membrane measurements show how the membrane motion serves to force the flow. This passive flow control introduced by the membranes motion alters the flows development over the wing and into the wake region demonstrating how, at least for lower angles of attack, the membranes motion drives the flow as opposed to the flow driving the membrane motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abudaram J, Stanford B, Ifju P (2009) Wind tunnel testing of load-alleviating membrane wings at low Reynolds numbers. In: Proceedings of the 47th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, 5–8 Jan, Orlando, AIAA-2009-1468

  • Abudaram YJ, Ifju PG, Hubner JP, Ukeiley L (2012) Controlling pre-tension of silicone membranes on micro air vehicle flexible wings. In: Proceedings of the 50th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, 9–12 Jan, Nashville, AIAA-2012-390

  • Albertani R, Stanford B, Hubner JP, Ifju PG (2007) Aerodynamic coefficients and deformation measurements on flexible micro air vehicle wings. Exp Mech 47(5):625–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albertani R, Khambatta P, Hart A, Ukeiley L, Oyarzun M, Cattafesta L, Abate G (2009) Validation of a low Reynolds number aerodynamic characterization facility. In: Proceedings of the 47th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, 5–8 January, Orlando, AIAA-2009-880

  • Anderson JD (2011) Fundamental of aerodynamics, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 462–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Attar PJ, Gordnier RE, Johnston JW, Romberg WA, Parthasarathy RN (2011) Aeroelastic analysis of membrane microair vehicles—part I: flutter and limit cycle analysis for fixed-wing configurations. J Vib Acoust 133(2):021008-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Balachandran B, Magrab EB (2009) Vibrations, 2nd edn. Cengage Learning, Toronto 79

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendat JS, Piersol AG (2010) Random data: analysis and measurement procedures, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 93–94

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gordnier RE (2009) High fidelity computational simulation of a membrane wing airfoil. J Fluid Struct 25(5):897–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordnier RE, Attar PJ (2009) Implicit LES simulations of a low Reynolds number flexible membrane wing airfoil. In: Proceedings of the 47th aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, 5–8 Jan, Orlando, AIAA-2009-579

  • Hu H, Tamai M, Murphy JT (2008) Flexible-membrane airfoils at low Reynolds numbers. J Aircraft 45(5):1767–1778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubner JP, Hicks T (2011) Trailing-edge scalloping effect on flat-plate membrane wing performance. J Aerosp Sci Technol 15(8):670–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston JW, Romberg W, Attar PJ, Parthasarathy R (2010) Experimental characterization of limit cycle oscillations in membrane wing micro air vehicles. J Aircraft 47(4):1300–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knisely CW (1990) Strouhal numbers of rectangular cylinders at incidence: a reviewand new data. J Fluids Struct 4:371–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lian Y, Shyy W (2007) Laminar-turbulent transition of a low Reynolds number rigid or flexible airfoil. AIAA J 45(7):1501–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lian Y, Shyy W, Viieru D, Zhang B (2003) Membrane wing aerodynamics for micro air vehicles. Prog Aerosp Sci 39:425–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastramico N, Hubner JP (2008) A study of separation reattachment on membrane flat and cambered plates, 26th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, June, AIAA Paper 2008-4369

  • Mueller TJ (2001) Fixed and flapping wing aerodynamics of micro air vehicle applications. AIAA, Reston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller TJ, Kellogg JC, Ifju PG, Shkarayev SV (2007) Introduction to the design of fixed-wing micro air vehicles: including three case studies. AIAA, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto M, Azuma A (2011) Aerodynamic characteristics at low Reynolds numbers for wings of various planforms. AIAA J 49(6):1135–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad A (2000) Particle image velocimetry. Curr Sci 79(1):51–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae A, Pope WH (1984) Low-speed wind tunnel testing, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 364–374, 419–424

  • Raffel M, Willert CE, Wereley ST, Kompenhans J (2007) Particle image velocimetry (a practical guide), 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojratsirikul P, Wang Z, Gursul I (2009) Unsteady fluid-structure interactions of membrane airfoils at low Reynolds numbers. Exp Fluids 46(5):859–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojratsirikul P, Wang Z, Gursul I (2010) Effect of pre-strain and excess length on unsteady fluid–structure interactions of membrane airfoils. J Fluids Struct 26(3):359–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojratsirikul P, Genc MS, Wang Z, Gursul I (2011) Flow-induced vibrations of low aspect ratio rectangular membrane wings. J Fluids Struct 27(8):1296–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott K, Hubner JP, Ukeiley L (2012) Cell geometry and material property effects on membrane and flow response. AIAA J 50(3):755–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shindo S (1995) Simplified tunnel correction method. J Aircraft 32(1):210–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shyy W, Ifju P, Viieru D (2005) Membrane wing-based micro air vehicles. Appl Mech Rev 58(4):283–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith R, Shyy W (1996) Computation of aerodynamic coefficients for a flexible membrane airfoil in turbulent flow: a comparison with classical theory. Phys Fluids 8(12):3346–3353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Song A, Tian X, Israeli E, Galvao R, Bishop K, Swartz S, Breuer K (2008) Aeromechanics of membrane wings with implications for animal flight. AIAA J 46(8):2096–2106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford B, Ifju P, Albertani R, Shyy W (2008) Fixed membrane wings for micro air vehicles: experimental characterization, numerical modeling, and tailoring. Prog Aerosp Sci 44(4):258–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian X, Iriarte-Diaz J, Middleton K, Galvao R, Israeli E, Roemer A, Sullivan A, Song A, Swartz S, Breuer K (2006) Direct measurements of the kinematics and dynamics of bat flight. Bioinspir Biomim 1(4):S10–S18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timpe A (2012) Flow and structure interactions of membrane wings at low Reynolds number, MS thesis, University of Florida

  • Torres GE, Mueller TJ (2004) Low-aspect-ratio wing aerodynamics at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA J 42(5):865–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregidgo L, Wang Z, Gursul I (2011) Fluid-structure interactions for a low aspect-ratio membrane wing at low Reynolds numbers. In: Proceedings of the 41st fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, 27–30 June, Honolulu, AIAA-2011-3436

  • Zhang Z, Hubner JP, Timpe A, Ukeiley L, Abudarm Y, Ifju P (2012) Effect of aspect ratio on flat-plate membrane airfoils, January, Nashville, AIAA-2012-1084

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of both the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) through the grant FA9550-10-1-0152, under a program managed by Dr. D. Smith and the Florida Center for Advanced Aero Propulsion (FCAAP). The authors would also like to acknowledge Y. Abudaram for the developing and manufacturing the wings used in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Ukeiley.

Additional information

This article is part of the collection Topics in Flow Control. Guest Editors J. P. Bonnet and L. Cattafesta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Timpe, A., Zhang, Z., Hubner, J. et al. Passive flow control by membrane wings for aerodynamic benefit. Exp Fluids 54, 1471 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1471-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1471-0

Keywords

Navigation