Skip to main content
Log in

Robot-assisted post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in germ cell tumor: is the single-docking with lateral approach relevant?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Surgical treatment of post-chemotherapy residual mass of germ cell tumor (GCT) may be performed in various techniques. We assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of single-docking with lateral approach robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-RPLND) in residual mass of GCT in our center.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of patients undergoing R-RPLND for residual mass of CGT was performed between January 2014 and April 2017. Patients with residual mass < 3 cm for seminoma or < 1 cm for non-seminoma were eligible. All surgeries were performed with single-docking RPNLD technique in lateral decubitus. We assessed preoperative characteristics (age, testicular pathology, template, chemotherapy regimen, lesion size, and clinical stage), peroperative (operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative complication, node count, pathology, and number of positive node), and postoperative outcomes (postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, recurrence-free survival at 2 year, and ejaculation dysfunction).

Results

Eleven patients underwent R-RPLND with a median size of the residual mass of 20 mm. Median operative time was 153 min with 120 ml of estimated blood loss, without intraoperative complication. Median nodes count was 7 [1; 24]. Two patients had post-chemotherapy necrotic nodes and one no tumorous node. One patient had postoperative Clavien I complication (chyloperitoneum). We report 72.7% of antegrade ejaculation at 1 month from the surgery. Median clinical recurrence-free survival was 100% after 2 years from the surgery (n = 6).

Conclusion

Lateral approach with single-docking R-RPLND for residual mass of GCT is feasible and safe, with satisfying functional and oncologic outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miki T et al (2014) Clinical characteristics and oncological outcomes of testicular cancer patients registered in 2005 and 2008: the first large-scale study from the Cancer Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association. Int J Urol 21:S1–S6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chéry L, Dash A (2015) The role of postchemotherapy surgery in germ cell tumors. Urol Clin North Am 42:331–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Treglia G et al (2014) Diagnostic performance of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the postchemotherapy management of patients with seminoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int 2014:852681

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Oechsle K et al (2008) [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors after chemotherapy: the German multicenter positron emission tomography study group. J Clin Oncol 26:5930–5935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Faria EF et al (2017) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as a safe procedure for postchemotherapy residual mass in testicular cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2017.0381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jain S, Gautam G (2015) Robotics in urologic oncology. J Minim Access Surg 11:40–44

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pearce SM et al (2017) Safety and early oncologic effectiveness of primary robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer. Eur Urol 71:476–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stepanian S, Patel M, Porter J (2016) Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: evolution of the technique. Eur Urol 70:661–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Williams SB, Lau CS, Josephson DY (2011) Initial series of robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer. Eur Urol 60:1299–1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cost NG et al (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in an adolescent population. J Endourol 26:635–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bora GS et al (2017) Post chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in germ cell tumor: robotic way. J Robot Surg 11:279–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh A, Chatterjee S, Bansal P, Bansal A, Rawal S (2017) Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: feasibility and outcome in postchemotherapy residual mass in testicular cancer. Indian J Urol 33:304–309

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Albers P, Foster RS, Voges GE, Donohue JP (2010) Nerve sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RLA). Aktuelle Urol 41:201–210 (212; quiz 211)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hillelsohn JH, Duty BD, Okhunov Z, Kavoussi LR (2012) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer. Arab J Urol 10:66–73

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sim HG, Lange PH, Lin DW (2007) Role of post-chemotherapy surgery in germ cell tumors. Urol Clin North Am 34:199–217 (abstract ix)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nicolai N et al (2017) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical stage i nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis: safety and efficacy analyses at a high volume center. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.088

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Hobisch A, Bartsch G (2001) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J. Endourol 15:449–453 (discussion 453–455)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams SB et al (2010) Morbidity of open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: contemporary perioperative data. BJU Int 105:918–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Subramanian VS, Nguyen CT, Stephenson AJ, Klein EA (2010) Complications of open primary and post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer. Urol Oncol 28:504–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gardner MW et al (2011) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for low-stage cancer: a Washington University update. J Endourol 25:1753–1757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guzzo TJ, Gonzalgo ML, Allaf ME (2010) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with therapeutic intent in men with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. J Endourol 24:1759–1763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Davol P, Sumfest J, Rukstalis D (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Urology 67:199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheney SM, Andrews PE, Leibovich BC, Castle EP (2015) Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: technique and initial case series of 18 patients. BJU Int 115:114–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stout TE, Soni SD, Goh AC (2016) Post-chemotherapy robotic bilateral retroperitoneal lymph node dissection using a novel single-dock technique. J Robot Surg 10:353–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kamel MH, Littlejohn N, Cox M, Eltahawy EA, Davis R (2016) Post-chemotherapy robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: institutional experience. J Endourol 30:510–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Porter JR (2017) A laparoscopic approach is best for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: yes. J Urol 197:1384–1386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Baniel J, Foster RS, Rowland RG, Bihrle R, Donohue JP (1995) Complications of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J Urol 153:976–980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee SH, Kim DS, Chang S-G, Jeon SH (2015) Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for stage IIIb mixed germ cell testicular cancer after chemotherapy. Korean J Urol 56:540–544

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Dogra PN et al (2013) Robot assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular tumor. Urol Ann 5:223–226

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CO: data collection and management, data analysis, and manuscript writing. JBB: project development, data analysis, and manuscript writing. LM: project development. PR: project development. MS: project development. MR: project development, data management, and data analysis. ND: project development, data collection or management, and data analysis

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Doumerc.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Nicolas Doumerc is a consultant for intuitive surgical.

Research involving human participants

Yes.

Informed consent

Not concerned (retrospective study).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Overs, C., Beauval, J.B., Mourey, L. et al. Robot-assisted post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in germ cell tumor: is the single-docking with lateral approach relevant?. World J Urol 36, 655–661 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2177-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2177-y

Keywords

Navigation