Skip to main content
Log in

Robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy: first experience with the novel Da Vinci single-site platform

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To report our first cases of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site (R-LESS) radical nephrectomy with the novel Da Vinci R-LESS platform (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA).

Methods

Six radical nephrectomies were performed with R-LESS Da Vinci single-site port and instruments. Data concerning patients characteristics, indication of surgery, operative and postoperative outcomes were collected.

Results

All procedures were completed successfully. Two patients required the placement of an additional port. Median operative, docking and console times were 179 min (range 120–318), 19 min (range 15–24) and 129 min (range 100–264), respectively. Median blood loss was 100 ml (range 50–800). No significant robotic-related problem was noticed during the procedures. There was no operative or major postoperative (Clavien >2) complication. Median length of hospital stay was 3 days.

Conclusion

Our initial experience of R-LESS radical nephrectomies with the novel Da Vinci platform shows that the procedure is feasible. Indications, safety and place of the technique will be confirmed with growing experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Kim FJ et al (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases. Eur Urol 60:998–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Autorino R, Cadeddu JA, Desai MM et al (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 59:26–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Escobar PF, Fader AN, Paraiso MF, Kaouk JH, Falcone T (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: initial report and technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:589–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stein RJ, White WM, Goel RK, Irwin BH, Haber GP, Kaouk JH (2010) Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using GelPort as the access platform. Eur Urol 57:132–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. White MA, Haber GP, Autorino R et al (2010) Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy: technique and early outcomes. Eur Urol 58:544–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Han WK, Kim DS, Jeon HG et al (2011) Robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: partial nephrectomy for renal malignancy. Urology 77:612–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haber GP, White MA, Autorino R et al (2010) Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Urology 76:1279–1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Laydner H et al (2012) Robotic single-site kidney surgery: evaluation of second-generation instruments in a cadaver model. Urology 79:975–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cestari A, Buffi NM, Lista G et al (2012) Feasibility and preliminary clinical outcomes of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site (R-LESS) pyeloplasty using a new single-port platform. Eur Urol 62:175–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolters U, Wolf T, Stutzer H, Schroder T (1996) ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 77:217–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Micali S, Pini G, Teber D et al (2013) New trends in minimally invasive urological surgery. What is beyond the robot? World J Urol 31:505–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Autorino R, Kaouk JH, Stolzenburg JU et al (2013) Current status and future directions of robotic single-site surgery: a systematic review. Eur Urol 63:266–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Joseph RA, Goh AC, Cuevas SP et al (2010) “Chopstick” surgery: a novel technique improves surgeon performance and eliminates arm collision in robotic single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 24:1331–1335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. White MA, Autorino R, Spana G et al (2011) Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy: surgical technique and comparative outcomes. Eur Urol 59:815–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vizza E, Corrado G, Mancini E et al (2013) Robotic single-site hysterectomy in low risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol 20:2759–2764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S et al (2011) First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci single-site platform. Surg Endosc 25:3566–3573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morel P, Hagen ME, Bucher P, Buchs NC, Pugin F (2011) Robotic single-port cholecystectomy using a new platform: initial clinical experience. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2182–2186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Konstantinidis KM, Hirides P, Hirides S, Chrysocheris P, Georgiou M (2012) Cholecystectomy using a novel single-site® robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 26:2687–2694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cela V, Freschi L, Simi G, Ruggiero M, Tana R, Pluchino N (2013) Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome. Surg Endosc 27:2638–2643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Maglione V et al (2012) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg Endosc 26:1648–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Mathieu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mathieu, R., Verhoest, G., Vincendeau, S. et al. Robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy: first experience with the novel Da Vinci single-site platform. World J Urol 32, 273–276 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1161-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1161-9

Keywords

Navigation