Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of dorsal vascular complex size on the recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The dorsal vascular complex (DVC) of the prostate is considered to be a functional structure having smooth muscles that are connected to the detrusor apron. We conducted this study to provide basic information regarding DVC size as measured by magnetic resonance imaging and to investigate whether DVC size is related to the recovery of continence following radical prostatectomy (RP).

Methods

We prospectively collected data that included the results of prostate MRI and continence recovery of patients who underwent RP. From April 2006 through February 2010, 862 patients underwent RP. Of these, a total of 731 cases were included in the final analysis. The height and width of the DVC were measured in the T1-weighted axial image at the level that showed the puboprostatic ligament.

Results

The continence rate of the total patient cohort at 12 months was 96.7 %. The mean width, height and area of the DVC were 2.0 ± 0.4 cm, 1.2 ± 0.3 cm and 1.8 ± 0.6 cm2, respectively, and there was no linear correlation between continence recovery and these parameters. However, the patients who had a moderately large-sized DVC (2.3–2.8 cm2) regained their continence significantly sooner (mean duration = 2.1 months) than those with small (3.7 months, p = 0.002) or extremely large DVC (4.0 months, p = 0.006). In a multivariate analysis, DVC size, age, transfusion and the length of membranous urethra were significant predictors of continence recovery.

Conclusion

The patients who had a moderately large DVC regained continence faster following RP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ et al (2010) A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 57:179–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benoit G, Droupy S, Quillard J, Paradis V, Giuliano F (1999) Supra and infralevator neurovascular pathways to the penile corpora cavernosa. J Anat 195(Pt 4):605–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Power NE, Silberstein JL, Kulkarni GS, Laudone VP (2011) The dorsal venous complex (DVC): dorsal venous or dorsal vasculature complex? Santorini’s plexus revisited. BJU Int 108:930–932

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Myers RP (2002) Detrusor apron, associated vascular plexus, and avascular plane: relevance to radical retropubic prostatectomy–anatomic and surgical commentary. Urology 59:472–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ozdemir MB, Eskicorapci SY, Baydar DE, Cumhur M, Onderoglu S, Ozen H (2007) A cadaveric histological investigation of the prostate with three-dimensional reconstruction for better results in continence and erectile function after radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 10:77–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Coakley FV, Eberhardt S, Kattan MW, Wei DC, Scardino PT, Hricak H (2002) Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 168:1032–1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee SE, Byun SS, Lee HJ et al (2006) Impact of variations in prostatic apex shape on early recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 68:137–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eisen EA, Agalliu I, Thurston SW, Coull BA, Checkoway H (2004) Smoothing in occupational cohort studies: an illustration based on penalised splines. Occup Environ Med 61:854–860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Govindarajulu US, Spiegelman D, Thurston SW, Ganguli B, Eisen EA (2007) Comparing smoothing techniques in Cox models for exposure-response relationships. Stat Med 26:3735–3752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaul S, Bhandari A, Hemal A, Savera A, Shrivastava A, Menon M (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy with preservation of the prostatic fascia: a feasibility study. Urology 66:1261–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Bhandari M, Satyanarayana R, Siva S, Agarwal PK (2009) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technical modifications in 2009. Eur Urol 56:89–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Rabenalt R et al (2006) Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy–effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Eur Urol 49:103–111 (discussion 111-2)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Takenaka A, Tewari AK, Leung RA et al (2007) Preservation of the puboprostatic collar and puboperineoplasty for early recovery of urinary continence after robotic prostatectomy: anatomic basis and preliminary outcomes. Eur Urol 51:433–440 (discussion 440)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Asimakopoulos AD, Annino F, D’Orazio A et al (2010) Complete periprostatic anatomy preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP): the new pubovesical complex-sparing technique. Eur Urol 58:407–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tewari AK, Bigelow K, Rao S et al (2007) Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar: a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Urology 69:726–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tewari A, Jhaveri J, Rao S et al (2008) Total reconstruction of the vesico-urethral junction. BJU Int 101:871–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

IRB number: B-1105-127-106. This study was supported by a grant from the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Research Fund (02-2010-031). Woong Na, Jung Su Nam, Seung Beom Ha and Hyung Suk Kim assisted with data retrieval and review. We thank Soyeon Ahn in the Medical Research Collaboration Center of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital for providing statistics consultation and support.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung Kyu Hong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeong, C.W., Oh, J.J., Jeong, S.J. et al. Effect of dorsal vascular complex size on the recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 31, 383–388 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0857-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0857-6

Keywords

Navigation