Skip to main content
Log in

Improved detection of microbial ureteral stent colonisation by sonication

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The diagnosis of microbial ureteral stent colonisation (MUSC) is difficult, since routine diagnostic techniques do not accurately detect microorganisms embedded in biofilms. New methods may improve diagnostic yield and understanding the pathophysiology of MUSC. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential of sonication in the detection of MUSC and to identify risk factors for device colonisation.

Methods

Four hundred and eight polyurethane ureteral stents of 300 consecutive patients were prospectively evaluated. Conventional urine culture (CUC) was obtained prior to stent placement and device removal. Sonication was performed to dislodge adherent microorganisms. Data of patient sex and age, indwelling time and indication for stent placement were recorded.

Results

Sonicate-fluid culture detected MUSC in 36%. Ureteral stents inserted during urinary tract infection (UTI) were more frequently colonised (59%) compared to those placed in sterile urine (26%; P < 0.001). Female sex (P < 0.001) and continuous stenting (P < 0.005) were significant risk factors for MUSC; a similar trend was observed in patients older than 50 years (P = 0.16). MUSC and indwelling time were positively correlated (P < 0.005). MUSC was accompanied by positive CUC in 36%. Most commonly isolated microorganisms were Coagulase-negative staphylococci (18.3%), Enterococci (17.9%) and Enterobacteriaceae (16.9%).

Conclusions

Sonication is a promising approach in the diagnosis of MUSC. Significant risk factors for MUSC are UTI at the time of stent insertion, female sex, continuous stenting and indwelling time. CUC is a poor predictor of MUSC. The clinical relevance of MUSC needs further evaluation to classify isolated microorganism properly as contaminants or pathogens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gautam G, Singh AK, Kumar R, Hemal AK, Kothari A (2006) Beware! Fungal urosepsis may follow endoscopic intervention for prolonged indwelling ureteral stent. J Endourol 20(7):522–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Riedl CR, Plas E, Hubner WA, Zimmerl H, Ulrich W, Pfluger H (1999) Bacterial colonization of ureteral stents. Eur Urol 36(1):53–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Farsi HM, Mosli HA, Al-Zemaity MF, Bahnassy AA, Alvarez M (1995) Bacteriuria and colonization of double-pigtail ureteral stents: long-term experience with 237 patients. J Endourol 9(6):469–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Keane PF, Bonner MC, Johnston SR, Zafar A, Gorman SP (1994) Characterization of biofilm and encrustation on ureteric stents in vivo. Br J Urol 73(6):687–691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lifshitz DA, Winkler HZ, Gross M, Sulkes J, Baniel J, Livne PM (1999) Predictive value of urinary cultures in assessment of microbial colonization of ureteral stents. J Endourol 13(10):735–738

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lojanapiwat B (2006) Colonization of internal ureteral stent and bacteriuria. World J Urol 24(6):681–683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Paick SH, Park HK, Oh SJ, Kim HH (2003) Characteristics of bacterial colonization and urinary tract infection after indwelling of double-J ureteral stent. Urology 62(2):214–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kehinde EO, Rotimi VO, Al-Hunayan A, bdul-Halim H, Boland F, Al-Awadi KA (2004) Bacteriology of urinary tract infection associated with indwelling J ureteral stents. J Endourol 18(9):891–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Klis R, Korczak-Kozakiewicz E, Denys A, Sosnowski M, Rozanski W (2009) Relationship between urinary tract infection and self-retaining double-J catheter colonization. J Endourol 23(6):1015–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reid G, Denstedt JD, Kang YS, Lam D, Nause C (1992) Microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on ureteral stents in vitro and in vivo. J Urol 148(5):1592–1594

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ et al (2007) Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med 357(7):654–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E et al (2009) Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis 49(1):1–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson ML, Gaido L (2004) Laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infections in adult patients. Clin Infect Dis 38(8):1150–1158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Costerton W, Veeh R, Shirtliff M, Pasmore M, Post C, Ehrlich G (2003) The application of biofilm science to the study and control of chronic bacterial infections. J Clin Invest 112(10):1466–1477

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Padberg FT Jr, Smith SM, Eng RH (1992) Optimal method for culturing vascular prosthetic grafts. J Surg Res 53(4):384–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tunney MM, Patrick S, Gorman SP et al (1998) Improved detection of infection in hip replacements. A currently underestimated problem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(4):568–572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sherertz RJ, Raad II, Belani A et al (1990) Three-year experience with sonicated vascular catheter cultures in a clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 28(1):76–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pitt WG, Ross SA (2003) Ultrasound increases the rate of bacterial cell growth. Biotechnol Prog 19(3):1038–1044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Trampuz A, Osmon DR, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Patel R (2003) Molecular and antibiofilm approaches to prosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 414:69–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pitt WG (2005) Removal of oral biofilm by sonic phenomena. Am J Dent 18(5):345–352

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Piyasena P, Mohareb E, McKellar RC (2003) Inactivation of microbes using ultrasound: a review. Int J Food Microbiol 87(3):207–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. von Eiff EC, Peters G, Heilmann C (2002) Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Lancet Infect Dis 2(11):677–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Schmitz FJ et al (2001) Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program, 1997–1999. Clin Infect Dis 32(Suppl 2):S114–S132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Montagnini SD, Mamizuka EM, Pereira CA, Srougi M (2000) Microbiologic aerobic studies on normal male urethra. Urology 56(2):207–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Donlan RM, Costerton JW (2002) Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 15(2):167–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Santin M, Motta A, Denyer SP, Cannas M (1999) Effect of the urine conditioning film on ureteral stent encrustation and characterization of its protein composition. Biomaterials 20(13):1245–1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chew BH, Lange D (2009) Ureteral stent symptoms and associated infections: a biomaterials perspective. Nat Rev Urol 6(8):440–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/

  29. Halekoh U, Højsgaard S, Yan J (2006) The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Statist Soft 15(2):1–11. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v15/i02/

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liang K-Y, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73(1):13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gernot Bonkat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonkat, G., Rieken, M., Rentsch, C.A. et al. Improved detection of microbial ureteral stent colonisation by sonication. World J Urol 29, 133–138 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-010-0535-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-010-0535-5

Keywords

Navigation