Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Peritoneal cavity as bioreactor to grow autologous tubular urethral grafts in a rabbit model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate whether peritoneal cavity could function as bioreactor to produce autologous tubular grafts for urethral reconstruction in male rabbits.

Methods

8Fr silastic tubes were implanted into peritoneal cavities of nine male rabbits. By 2 weeks, tubes were harvested and the tubular tissue covering the tubes was everted. A pendulous urethral segment of 1.5 cm long was totally excised and urethroplasty was performed with the everted tubular tissue in an end-to-end fashion. Another nine male rabbits underwent the same urethral resection and re-anastomosis as controls. Urethrography was performed at 1, 2 and 6 months postoperatively. Meanwhile, the neo-urethra were harvested and analyzed grossly and histologically.

Results

Histological analysis of the tubular tissue demonstrated transversely arranged myofibroblasts embedded in homogeneous collagen bundles and an outer layer of mesothelium. The tissue was easily everted and successfully transplanted as a urethral graft. Serial urethrography indicated no stricture or diverticula formation. While all animals of the control group developed stricture. Histological analysis of the neo-urethra demonstrated normal urethral architecture by 1 month, composed of multi-layers of urothelium surrounded by smooth muscle bundles, which became increasingly organized with time. By 6 months, the neo-urethra could be hardly distinguished from native urethra both grossly and histologically.

Conclusions

These results show that the autologous tissue grown within the recipients’ peritoneal cavity can be used successfully for tubularized urethral reconstruction in male rabbits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barbagli G, Guazzoni G, Palminteri E et al (2006) Anastomotic fibrous ring as cause of stricture recurrence after bulbar onlay graft urethroplasty. J Urol 176:614–619. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbagli G, Guazzoni G, Lazzeri M (2008) One-stage bulbar urethroplasty: retrospective analysis of the results in 375 patients. Eur Urol 53:828–833. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ozgok Y, Ozgur Tan M, Kilciler M et al (2000) Use of bladder mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction. Int J Urol 7:355–360. doi:10.1046/j.1442-2042.2000.00210.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Levine LA, Strom KH, Lux MM (2007) Buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture repair: evaluation of the impact of stricture location and lichen sclerosus on surgical outcome. J Urol 178:2011–2015. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell JH, Efendy JL, Campbell GR (1999) Novel vascular graft grown within recipient’s own peritoneal cavity. Circ Res 85:1173–1178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chue WL, Campbell GR, Caplice N et al (2004) Dog peritoneal and pleural cavities as bioreactors to grow autologous vascular grafts. J Vasc Surg 39:859–867. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2003.03.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell GR, Turnbull G, Xiang L et al (2008) The peritoneal cavity as a bioreactor for tissue engineering visceral organs: bladder, uterus and vas deferens. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2:50–60. doi:10.1002/term.66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Filippo RE, Yoo JJ, Atala A (2002) Urethral replacement using cell seeded tubularized collagen matrices. J Urol 168:1789–1793. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000027662.69103.72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu Q, Deng CL, Liu W et al (2007) Urethral replacement using epidermal cell-seeded tubular acellular bladder collagen matrix. BJU Int 99:1162–1165. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06691.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shokeir A, Osman Y, Gabr M et al (2004) Acellular matrix tube for canine urethral replacement: is it fact or fiction? J Urol 171:453–456. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000089776.52568.9e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dorin RP, Pohl HG, De Filippo RE et al (2008) Tubularized urethral replacement with unseeded matrices: what is the maximum distance for normal tissue regeneration? World J Urol 26:323–326. doi:10.1007/s00345-008-0316-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kajbafzadeh AM, Arshadi H, Payabvash S et al (2007) Proximal hypospadias with severe chordee: single stage repair using corporeal tunica vaginalis free graft. J Urol 178:1036–1042. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zargooshi J (2004) Tube-onlay-tube tunica vaginalis flap for proximal primary and reoperative adult hypospadias. J Urol 171:224–228. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000101881.80100.ab

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaul DB, Xie HW, Diaz JF et al (1996) Use of tubularized peritoneal free grafts as urethral substitutes in the rabbit. J Pediatr Surg 31:225–228. doi:10.1016/S0022-3468(96)90002-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nanni L, Vallasciani S, Fadda G et al (2001) Free peritoneal grafts for patch urethroplasty in male rabbits. J Urol 165:578–580. doi:10.1097/00005392-200102000-00074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reddy PP, Barrieras DJ, Wilson G (2000) Regeneration of functional bladder substitutes using large segment acellular matrix allografts in a porcine model. J Urol 164:936–941. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67221-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sievert KD, Tanagho EA (2000) Organ-specific acellular matrix for reconstruction of the urinary tract. World J Urol 18:19–25. doi:10.1007/s003450050004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Herrick SE, Mutsaers SE (2004) Mesothelial progenitor cells and their potential in tissue engineering. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36:621–642. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2003.11.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Efendy JL, Campbell GR, Campbell JH (2000) The effect of environmental cues on the differentiation of myofibroblasts in peritoneal granulation tissue. J Pathol 192:257–262. doi:10.1002/1096-9896(2000)9999:9999<::AID-PATH681>3.0.CO;2-Y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by grants from Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau (040303-10) and Shanghai Shen Kang Platform Grant (SHDC12007206). We also thank Dr. Yilin Cao, Dr. Wei Liu (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China) and National Tissue Engineering Center of China (Shanghai, People’s Republic of China) for technical assistance.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest involved in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo-Hua Liu.

Additional information

G.-L. Gu and Y.-J. Zhu contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gu, GL., Zhu, YJ., Xia, SJ. et al. Peritoneal cavity as bioreactor to grow autologous tubular urethral grafts in a rabbit model. World J Urol 28, 227–232 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0447-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0447-4

Keywords

Navigation