Abstract
Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) plays an important role in transporting heat meridionally in the Earth’s climate system and is also a key metrical tool to verify oceanic general circulation models. Two OMIP (Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 1 and 2) simulations with LICOM3 (version 3 of the LASG/IAP Climate System Ocean Model) developed at the State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), are compared in this study. Both simulations well reproduce the fundamental characteristics of the AMOC, but the OMIP1 simulation shows a significantly stronger AMOC than the OMIP2 simulation. Because the LICOM3 configurations are identical between these two experiments, any differences between them must be attributed to the surface forcing data. Further analysis suggests that sea surface salinity (SSS) differences should be mainly responsible for the enhanced AMOC in the OMIP1 simulation, but sea surface temperature (SST) also play an unignorable role in modulating AMOC. In the North Atlantic, where deep convection occurs, the SSS in OMIP1 is more saline than that in OMIP1. We find that in the major region of deep convection, the change of SSS has more significant effect on density than the change of SST. As a result, the SSS was more saline than that in OMIP2, leading to stronger deep convection and subsequently intensify the AMOC. We conduct a series of numerical experiments with LICOM3, and the results confirmed that the changes in SSS have more significant effect on the strength of AMOC than the changes in SST.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
5 Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Broeker W S. 1991. The great ocean conveyor. Oceanography, 4(2): 79–89, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.1991.07.
Buckley M W, Marshall J. 2016. Observations, inferences, and mechanisms of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation: a review. Reviews of Geophysics, 54(1): 5–63, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000493.
Dai A G, Qian T T, Trenberth K E et al. 2009. Changes in continental freshwater discharge from 1948 to 2004. Journal of Climate, 22(10): 2773–2792, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2592.1.
Dai A G, Trenberth K E. 2002. Estimates of freshwater discharge from continents: latitudinal and seasonal variations. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 3(6): 660–687, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0660:EOFDFC>2.0.CO;2.
Danabasoglu G, Yeager S G, Bailey D et al. 2014. North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part I: mean states. Ocean Modelling, 73: 76–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/_j.ocemod.2013.10.005.
Danabasoglu G, Yeager S G, Kim W M et al. 2016. North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part II: inter-annual to decadal variability. Ocean Modelling, 97: 65–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.11.007.
de Boyer Montégut C, Madec G, Fischer A S et al. 2004. Mixed layer depth over the global ocean: an examination of profile data and a profile-based climatology. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 109(C12): C12003, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002378.
Delworth T L, Greatbatch R J. 2000. Multidecadal thermohaline circulation variability driven by atmospheric surface flux forcing. Journal of Climate, 13(9): 1481–1495, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<1481:MTCVDB>2.0.CO;2.
Dickson R R, Brown J. 1994. The production of North Atlantic Deep Water: sources, rates, and pathways. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 99(C6): 12319–12341, https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC00530.
Dong B, Sutton R. 2002. Variability in North Atlantic heat content and heat transport in a coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM. Climate Dynamics, 19(5): 485–497, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-002-0239-7.
Emile-Geay J, Cane M A, Naik N et al. 2003. Warren revisited: atmospheric freshwater fluxes and “Why is no deep water formed in the North Pacific”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 108(C6): 3178, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001058.
Eyring V, Bony S, Meehl G A et al. 2016. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geoscientfic Model Development, 9(5): 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016.
Good S A, Martin M J, Rayner N A. 2013. EN4: Quality controlled ocean temperature and salinity profiles and monthly objective analyses with uncertainty estimates. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 118(12): 6704–6716, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009067.
Gregory J M, Dixon K W, Stouffer R J et al. 2005. A model intercomparison of changes in the Atlantic thermohaline circulation in response to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(12): L12703, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023209.
Griffies S M, Danabasoglu G, Durack P J et al. 2016. OMIP contribution to CMIP6: experimental and diagnostic protocol for the physical component of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project. Geoscientific Model Development, 9(9): 3231–3296, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3231-2016.
Heuzé C. 2017. North Atlantic deep water formation and AMOC in CMIP5 models. Ocean Science, 13(4): 609–622, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-13-609-2017.
Heuzé C. 2021. Antarctic bottom water and north Atlantic deep water in CMIP6 models. Ocean Science, 17(1): 59–90, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-59-2021.
Johns W E, Baringer M O, Beal L M et al. 2011. Continuous, array-based estimates of Atlantic Ocean heat transport at 26.5°N. Journal of Climate, 24(10): 2429–2449, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3997.1.
Kuhlbrodt T, Griesel A, Montoya M et al. 2007. On the driving processes of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. Reviews of Geophysics, 45(2): RG2001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004RG000166.
Kuznetsova D A, Bashmachnikov I L. 2021. On the Mechanisms of variability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). Oceanology, 61(6): 803–814, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437021060072.
Large W G, Yeager S G. 2009. The global climatology of an interannually varying air-sea flux data set. Climate Dynamics, 33(2): 341–364, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0441-3.
Lee S K, Lumpkin R, Baringer M O et al. 2019. Global meridional overturning circulation inferred from a data-constrained ocean & sea-ice model. Geophysical Research Letters, 46(3): 1521–1530, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080940.
Lin P F, Yu Z P, Liu H L et al. 2020. LICOM model datasets for the CMIP6 Ocean model intercomparison project. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 37(3): 239–249, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-9208-5.
Liu H L, Lin P F, Yu Y Q et al. 2012. The baseline evaluation of LASG/IAP climate system ocean model (LICOM) version 2. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 26(3): 318–329, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-012-0305-y.
Liu H L, Zhang X H, Li W et al. 2004. An eddy-permitting oceanic general circulation model and its preliminary evaluation. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 21(5): 675–690, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02916365.
Marshall J, Schott F. 1999. Open-ocean convection: observations, theory, and models. Reviews of Geophysics, 37(1): 1–64, https://doi.org/10.1029/98RG02739.
Mecking J V, Drijfhout S S, Jackson L C et al. 2017. The effect of model bias on Atlantic freshwater transport and implications for AMOC bi-stability. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 69(1): 1299910, https://doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2017.1299910.
Menary M B, Jackson L C, Lozier M S. 2020a. Reconciling the relationship between the AMOC and Labrador Sea in OSNAP observations and climate models. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(18): e2020GL089793, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089793.
Menary M B, Robson J, Allan R P et al. 2020b. Aerosol-forced AMOC changes in CMIP6 historical simulations. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(14): e2020GL088166, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088166.
Putrasahan D A, Lohmann K, von Storch J S et al. 2019. Surface flux drivers for the slowdown of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in a high-resolution global coupled climate model. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11(5): 1349–1363, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001447.
Rhein M, Mertens C, Roessler A. 2019. Observed transport decline at 47°N, western Atlantic. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 124(7): 4875–4890, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC014993.
Roberts C D, Jackson L, McNeall D. 2014. Is the 2004–2012 reduction of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation significant?. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(9): 3204–3210, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059473.
Roberts M J, Jackson L C, Roberts C D et al. 2020. Sensitivity of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation to model resolution in CMIP6 HighResMIP simulations and implications for future changes. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12(8): e2019MS002014, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002014.
Schmitt R W. 2008. Salinity and the global water cycle. Oceanography, 21(1): 12–19, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2008.63.
Smeed D, Moat B, Rayner D et al. 2019. Atlantic meridional overturning circulation observed by the RAPID-MOCHA-WBTS (RAPID-Meridional Overturning Circulation and Heatflux Array-Western Boundary Time Series) array at 26N from 2004 to 2018. British Oceanographic Data Centre, Natural Environment Research Council, UK, https://doi.org/10.5285/8cd7e7bb-9a20-05d8-e053-6c86abc012c2.
Talley L D, Pickard G L, Emery W J et al. 2011. Global circulation and water properties. In: Talley L D, Pickard G L, Emery W J et al. eds. Descriptive Physical Oceanography. 6th edn. Academic Press, London. p. 473–511.
Trenberth K E, Caron J M, Stepaniak D P. 2001. The atmospheric energy budget and implications for surface fluxes and ocean heat transports. Climate Dynamics, 17(4): 259–276, https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00007927.
Trenberth K E, Fasullo J T. 2008. An observational estimate of inferred ocean energy divergence. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 38(5): 984–999, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JPO3833.1.
Tseng Y-H, Tsao S-E, Kuo Y-C et al. 2022. TIMCOM model datasets for the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project. Ocean Modelling, 179: 102109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2022.102109.
Tsujino H, Urakawa S, Nakano H et al. 2018. JRA-55 based surface dataset for driving ocean-sea-ice models (JRA55-do). Ocean Modelling, 130: 79–139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2018.07.002.
Wang C Z, Zhang L P, Lee S K et al. 2014. A global perspective on CMIP5 climate model biases. Nature Climate Change, 4: 201–205, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2118.
Warren B A. 1983. Why is no deep water formed in the North Pacific?. Journal of Marine Research, 41(2): 327–347, https://doi.org/10.1357/002224083788520207.
Watson A J, Messias M J, Fogelqvist E et al. 1999. Mixing and convection in the Greenland Sea from a tracerrelease experiment. Nature, 401(6756): 902–904, https://doi.org/10.1038/44807.
Weijer W, Cheng W, Garuba O A et al. 2020. CMIP6 models predict significant 21st century decline of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(12): e2019GL086075, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086075.
Yan X Q, Zhang R, Knutson T R. 2018. Underestimated AMOC variability and implications for AMV and predictability in CMIP models. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(9): 4319–4328, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077378.
Yu Y Q, Liu H L, Lin P F. 2012. A quasi-global 1/10° eddy-resolving ocean general circulation model and its preliminary results. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57(30): 3908–3916, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-012-5234-8.
Yu Y Q, Tang S L, Liu H L et al. 2018. Development and evaluation of the dynamic framework of an ocean general circulation model with arbitrary orthogonal curvilinear coordinate. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 42(4): 877–889, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1805.17284. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhang X H, Liang X Z. 1989. A numerical world ocean general circulation model. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 6(1): 44–61, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02656917.
6 Acknowlegment
We appreciate the invaluable comments and suggestions from two anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA19060102), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 91958201, 42130608), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDB42000000)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Yu, Y. Numerical simulations of Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) from OMIP experiments and its sensitivity to surface forcing. J. Ocean. Limnol. 42, 454–467 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-023-2364-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-023-2364-6