Skip to main content
Log in

Obstruction results in quantization theory

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nonlinear Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Quantization is not a straightforward proposition, as demonstrated by Groenewold's and Van Hove's discovery, exactly fifty years ago, of an “obstruction” to quantization. Their “no-go theorems” assert that it is in principle impossible to consistently quantize every classical observable on the phase spaceR 2n in a physically meaningful way. A similar obstruction was recently found forS 2, buttressing the common belief that no-go theoremss should hold in some generality. Surprisingly, this is not so—it has also just been proven that there is no obstruction to quantizing a torus.

In this paper we take first steps towards delineating the circumstances under which such obstructions will appear and understanding the mechanisms which produce them. Our objectives are to conjecture a generalized Groenewold-Van Hove theorem and to determine the maximal subalgebras of observables which can be consistently quantized. This requires a study of the structure of Poisson algebras of classical systems and their representations. To these ends we include an exposition of both prequantization (in an extended sense) and quantization theory—formulated in terms of “basic sets of observables”—and review in detail the known results forR 2n,S 2, andT 2. Our discussion is independent of any particular method of quantization; we concentrate on the structural aspects of quantization theory which are common to all Hilbert space-based quantization techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • [AM] Abraham, R. & Marsden, J.E. [1978]Foundations of Mechanics. Second Ed. Benjamin-Cummings, Reading, MA).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • [AA] Aldaya, V. & de Azcárraga, J. A. [1982] Quantization as a consequence of the symmetry group: An approach to geometric quantization.J. Math. Phys. 23, 1297–1305.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [AB] Arens, R. & Babbit, D. [1965] Algebraic difficulties of preserving dynamical relations when forming quantum-mechanical operators.J. Math. Phys. 6, 1071–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • [As] Ashtekar, A. [1980] On the relation between classical and quantum variables.Commun. Math. Phys. 71, 59–64.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Av] Avez, A. [1980]. Symplectic group, quantum mechanics and Anosov's systems In:Dynamical Systems and Microphysics. Blaquiere, A. et al., Eds. (Springer-Verlag, New York) 301–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • [BaRa] Barut, A. O. & Rączka, R. [1977]Theory of Group Representations and Applications. (Polish Scientific Pub., Warsaw).

    Google Scholar 

  • [BFFLS] Bayen, F., Flato, M., Fronsdal, C., Lichnerowicz, A. & Sternheimer, D., [1978] Deformation theory and quantization I, II.Ann. Phys. 110, 61–110, 111–151.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [B11] Blattner, R. J. [1983] On geometric quantization. In:Non-Linear Partial Differential Operators and Quantization Procedures. Andersson, S. I. & Doebner, H.-D., Eds.Lecture Notes in Math. 1087, 209–241.

  • [B12] Blattner, R. J. [1991] Some remarks on quantization. In:Symplectic Geometry and Mathematical Physics. Donato, P. et al., EdsProgress in Math. 99 (Birkhäuser, Boston) 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • [BrRo] Bratteli, O. & Robinson, D. W. [1979]Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics I. (Springer New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • [Ch1] Chernoff, P. R. [1981] Mathematical obstructions to quantization.Hadronic J. 4, 879–898.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Ch2] Chernoff, P. R. [1995] Irreducible representations of infinite dimensional transformation groups and Lie algebras I.J. Funct. Anal. 130, 255–282.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Ch3] Chernoff, P. R. [1996] Private communication.

  • [Co] Cohen, L. [1996] Generalized phase-space distribution functions.J. Math. Phys. 7, 781–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • [Di] Dirac, P. A. M. [1967]The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Revised Fourth Ed. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • [Em] Emch, G. G. [1972]Algebraic Methods in Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory, (Wiley, New York).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • [FI] Flato, M. [1976] Theory of analytic vectors and applications. In:Mathematical Physics and Physical Mathematics. Maurin, K. & Rączka, R., Eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht) 231–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Fo] Folland, G. B. [1989]Harmonic Analysis in Phase Space. Ann. Math. Ser.122 (Princeton University Press, Princeton).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • [Fr] Fronsdal, C. [1978] Some ideas about quantization.Rep. Math. Phys. 15, 111–145.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [GJ] Glimm, J. & Jaffe, A. [1981]Quantum Physics. A Functional Integral Point of View. (Springer-Verlag, New York).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • [Go1] Gotay, M. J. [1980] Functorial geometric quantization and Van Hove's theorem.Int. J. Theor. Phys. 19, 139–161.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Go2] Gotay, M. J. [1987] A class of non-polarizable symplectic manifolds.Mh. Math. 103, 27–30.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Go3] Gotay, M. J. [1995] On a full quantization of the torus. In:Quantization, Coherent States and Complex Structures, Antoine, J.-P. et al., Eds. (Plenum, New York) 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • [GGH] Gotay, M. J., Grundling, H., & Hurst, C. A. [1996] A Groenewold-Van Hove theorem forS 2.Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 32, 1579–1597.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Gr] Groenewold, H. J. [1946] On the principles of elementary quantum mechanics.Physica 12, 405–460.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [GS] Guillemin, V. & Sternberg, S. [1984]Symplectic Techniques in Physics. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • [He] Hennings, M. A. [1986] Fronsdal*-quantization and Fell inducing.Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 99, 179–188.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Is] Isham, C. J. [1984] Topological and global aspects of quantum theory. In:Relativity, Groups, and Topology II DeWitt, B. S. & Stora, R., Eds. (North-Holand, Amsterdam) 1059–1290.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Jo] Joseph, A. [1970] Derivations of Lie brackets and canonical quantization.Commun. Math. Phys. 17, 210–232.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • [KS] Kerner, E. H. & Sutcliffe, W. G. [1970] Unique Hamiltonian operators via Feynman path integrals.J. Math. Phys. 11, 391–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • [Ki] Kirillov, A. A. [1990] Geometric quantization. In:Dynamical Systems IV: Symplectic Geometry and Its Applications. Arnol'd, V. I. and Novikov, S. P., Eds. Encyclopædia Math. Sci.IV. (Springer-Verlag, New York) 137–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Ku] Kuryshkin, V. V. [1972] La mécanique quantique avec une fonction, non-négative de distribution dans l'espace des phases.Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré 17, 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • [KLZ] Kuryshkin, V. V., Lyabis, I. A., & Zaparovanny, Y. I. [1978] Sur le problème de la regle de correspondence en théorie quantique.Ann. Fond. L. de Broglie. 3, 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Ma] Mackey, G. W. [1976]The Theory of Unitary Group Representations (University of Chicago Press Chicago).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • [MC] Margenau, H. & Cohen, L. [1967] Probabilities in quantum mechanics. In:Quantum Theory and Reality. Bunge, M. Ed. (Springer-Verlag, New York), 71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • [MMSV] Mnatsakanova, M., Morchio, G., Strocchi, F., & Vernov, Yu. [1995] Irreducible representations of the Heisenberg algebra in Krein spaces. Preprint, mp-arc: 95–534.

  • [ReSi] Reed, M. & Simon, B. [1972]Functional Analysis 1. (Academic Press, New York).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • [Ri] Rieffel, M. A. [1989] Deformation quantization of Heisenberg manifolds.Commun. Math. Phys. 122, 531–562.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Ri2] Rieffel, M. A. [1990] Deformation quantization and operator algebras.Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 45, 411–423.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Ri3] Rieffel, M. A. [1993] Quantization andC *-algebras. In:C *-Algebras: 1943–1993, A Fifty Year Celebration Doran, R. S., Ed.Contemp. Math. 167, 67–97.

  • [So] Souriau, J.-M. [1970]Structure des Systèmes Dynamiques. (Dunod, Paris). English translation in preparation [1997] (Birkhäuser, Boston).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • [Tu] Tuynman, G. M. [1995] Prequantization is irreducible. Preprint Lille. IRMA 37.

  • [Ur] Urwin, R. W. [1983] The prequantization representations of the Poisson Lie algebra.Adv. Math. 50, 126–154.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [VH1] van Hove, L. [1951] Sur certaines représentations unitaires d'un, groupe infini de transformations.Proc. Roy. Acad. Sci. Belgium 26, 1–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • [VH2] van Hove, L. [1951] Sur le problème des relations entre les transformations, unitaires de la mécanique quantique et les transformations canoniques de la mécanique classique.Acad. Roy. Belgique Bull. Cl. Sci. (5)37, 610–620.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [VN] von Neumann, J. [1955]Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. (Princeton University Press, Princeton).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • [We] Weinstein, A. [1989] Cohomology of symplectomorphism groups and critical values of Hamiltonians.Math. Z. 201, 75–82.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Wo] Woodhouse, N. M. J. [1992]Geometric quantization. Second Ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by Jerrold Marsden and Stephen Wiggins

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Juan C. Simo

Supported in part by NSF Grants DMS 92-22241 and 96-23083 (M.J.G.).

This paper was solicited by the editors to be part of a volume dedicated to the memory of Juan C. Simo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gotay, M.J., Grundling, H.B. & Tuynman, G.M. Obstruction results in quantization theory. J Nonlinear Sci 6, 469–498 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02440163

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02440163

Keywords

Navigation