Skip to main content
Log in

Adding non-contrast and delayed phases increases the diagnostic performance of arterial CTA for suspected active lower gastrointestinal bleeding

  • Vascular-Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

When assessing for lower gastrointestinal bleed (LGIB) using CTA, many advocate for acquiring non-contrast and delayed phases in addition to an arterial phase to improve diagnostic performance though the potential benefit of this approach has not been fully characterized. We evaluate diagnostic accuracy among radiologists when using single-phase, biphasic, and triphasic CTA in active LGIB detection.

Method and materials

A random experimental block design was used where 3 blinded radiologists specialty trained in interventional radiology retrospectively interpreted 96 CTA examinations completed between Oct 2012 and Oct 2017 using (1) arterial only, (2) arterial/non-contrast, and (3) arterial/non-contrast/delayed phase configurations. Confirmed positive and negative LGIB studies were matched, balanced, and randomly ordered. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive and negative predictive values, and time to identify the presence/absence of active bleeding were examined using generalized estimating equations (GEE) with sandwich estimation assuming a binary distribution to estimate relative benefit of diagnostic performance between phase configurations.

Results

Specificity increased with additional contrast phases (arterial 72.2; arterial/non-contrast 86.1; arterial/non-contrast/delayed 95.1; p < 0.001) without changes in sensitivity (arterial 77.1; arterial/non-contrast 70.2; arterial/non-contrast/delayed 73.1; p = 0.11) or mean time required to identify bleeding per study (s, arterial 34.8; arterial/non-contrast 33.1; arterial/non-contrast/delayed 36.0; p = 0.99). Overall agreement among readers (Kappa) similarly increased (arterial 0.47; arterial/non-contrast 0.65; arterial/non-contrast/delayed 0.79).

Conclusion

The addition of non-contrast and delayed phases to arterial phase CTA increased specificity and inter-reader agreement for the detection of lower gastrointestinal bleeding without increasing reading times.

Key Points

A triphasic CTA including non-contrast, arterial, and delayed phase has higher specificity for the detection of lower gastrointestinal bleeding than arterial-phase-only protocols.

Inter-reader agreement increases with additional contrast phases relative to single-phase CTA.

Increasing the number of contrast phases did not increase reading times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GEE :

Generalized estimating equations

LGIB :

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding

LR :

Likelihood ratio

References

  1. Farrell JJ, Friedman LS (2005) Review article: The management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 21:1281–1298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Laine L, Yang H, Chang SC, Datto C (2012) Trends for incidence of hospitalization and death due to GI complications in the United States from 2001 to 2009. Am J Gastroenterol 107:1190–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Longstreth GF (1997) Epidemiology and outcome of patients hospitalized with acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 92:419–424

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Strate LL, Naumann CR (2010) The role of colonoscopy and radiological procedures in the management of acute lower intestinal bleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:333–e44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zurkiya O, Walker TG (2015) Angiographic evaluation and management of nonvariceal gastrointestinal hemorrhage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:753–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alavi A, Dann RW, Baum S, Biery DN (1977) Scintigraphic detection of acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Radiology 124:753–756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Currie GM, Towers PA, Wheat JM (2006) Improved detection and localization of lower gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage by subtraction scintigraphy: phantom analysis. J Nucl Med Technol 34:160–168

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dusold R, Burke K, Carpentier W, Dyck WP (1994) The accuracy of technetium-99m–labeled red cell scintigraphy in localizing gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 89:345–348

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoon W, Jeong YY, Shin SS et al (2006) Acute massive gastrointestinal bleeding: detection and localization with arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 239:160–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Martí M, Artigas JM, Garzón G, Alvarez-Sala R, Soto JA (2012) Acute lower intestinal bleeding: feasibility and diagnostic performance of CT angiography. Radiology 262:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jaeckle T, Stuber G, Hoffmann MHK, Jeltsch M, Schmitz BL, Aschoff AJ (2008) Detection and localization of acute upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. Eur Radiol 18:1406–1413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacovides CL, Nadolski G, Allen SR et al (2015) Arteriography for lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage: role of preceding abdominal computed tomographic angiogram in diagnosis and localization. JAMA Surg 150:650–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clerc D, Grass F, Schäfer M, Denys A, Demartines N, Hübner M (2017) Lower gastrointestinal bleeding: computed tomographic angiography, colonoscopy or both? World J Emerg Surg. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0112-3

  14. Laing CJ, Tobias T, Rosenblum DI, Banker WL, Tseng L, Tamarkin SW (2007) Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: emerging role of multidetector CT angiography and review of current imaging techniques. Radiographics 27:1055–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2007) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Press, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE (1992) Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 27:723–731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Obuchowski NA, Rockette HE (1995) Hypothesis testing of diagnostic accuracy for multiple readers and multiple tests: an ANOVA approach with dependent observations. Commun Statist Simula 24:285–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hillis SL, Obuchowski NA, Schartz KM, Berbaum KS (2005) A comparison of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz and Obuchowski-Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data. Stat Med 24:1579–1607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hillis SL (2007) A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis. Stat Med 26:596–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hillis SL, Berbaum KS, Metz CE (2008) Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis. Acad Radiol 15:647–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JW, Shin SS, Yoon W et al (2011) Diagnosis of acute gastrointestinal bleeding: comparison of the arterial, the portal, and the combined set using 64-section computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35:206–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stuber T, Hoffmann MHK, Stuber G, Klass O, Feuerlein S, Aschoff AJ (2009) Pitfalls in detection of acute gastrointestinal bleeding with multidetector row helical CT. Abdom Imaging 34:476–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dobritz M, Engels HP, Schneider A, Bauer J, Rummeny EJ (2009) Detection of intestinal bleeding with multi-detector row CT in an experimental setup: how many acquisitions are necessary? Eur Radiol 19:2862–2869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Steiner K, Gollub F, Stuart S, Papadopoulou A, Woodward N (2011) Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: CT angiography with multi-planar reformatting. Abdom Imaging 36:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Artigas JM, Marti M, Soto JA, Esteban H, Pinilla I, Guillén E (2013) Multidetector CT angiography for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: technique and findings. Radiographics 33:1453–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:2078–2086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sauter AP, Muenzel D, Dangelmaier J et al (2018) Dual-layer spectral computed tomography: virtual non-contrast in comparison to true non-contrast images. Eur J Radiol 104:108–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew E. Pouw.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Matthew Pouw, MD.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

Grayson Baird, PhD, has significant statistical expertise and kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript.

Informed consent

Verbal consent was obtained from each participating radiologist and informed consent from patients on whom CTA examinations were obtained was waived by the Institutional Review Board given the retrospective nature of the review.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• retrospective

• experimental

• performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 6.87 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pouw, M.E., Albright, J.W., Kozhimala, M.J. et al. Adding non-contrast and delayed phases increases the diagnostic performance of arterial CTA for suspected active lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Eur Radiol 32, 4638–4646 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08559-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08559-z

Keywords

Navigation