Abstract
Objectives
When assessing for lower gastrointestinal bleed (LGIB) using CTA, many advocate for acquiring non-contrast and delayed phases in addition to an arterial phase to improve diagnostic performance though the potential benefit of this approach has not been fully characterized. We evaluate diagnostic accuracy among radiologists when using single-phase, biphasic, and triphasic CTA in active LGIB detection.
Method and materials
A random experimental block design was used where 3 blinded radiologists specialty trained in interventional radiology retrospectively interpreted 96 CTA examinations completed between Oct 2012 and Oct 2017 using (1) arterial only, (2) arterial/non-contrast, and (3) arterial/non-contrast/delayed phase configurations. Confirmed positive and negative LGIB studies were matched, balanced, and randomly ordered. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive and negative predictive values, and time to identify the presence/absence of active bleeding were examined using generalized estimating equations (GEE) with sandwich estimation assuming a binary distribution to estimate relative benefit of diagnostic performance between phase configurations.
Results
Specificity increased with additional contrast phases (arterial 72.2; arterial/non-contrast 86.1; arterial/non-contrast/delayed 95.1; p < 0.001) without changes in sensitivity (arterial 77.1; arterial/non-contrast 70.2; arterial/non-contrast/delayed 73.1; p = 0.11) or mean time required to identify bleeding per study (s, arterial 34.8; arterial/non-contrast 33.1; arterial/non-contrast/delayed 36.0; p = 0.99). Overall agreement among readers (Kappa) similarly increased (arterial 0.47; arterial/non-contrast 0.65; arterial/non-contrast/delayed 0.79).
Conclusion
The addition of non-contrast and delayed phases to arterial phase CTA increased specificity and inter-reader agreement for the detection of lower gastrointestinal bleeding without increasing reading times.
Key Points
• A triphasic CTA including non-contrast, arterial, and delayed phase has higher specificity for the detection of lower gastrointestinal bleeding than arterial-phase-only protocols.
• Inter-reader agreement increases with additional contrast phases relative to single-phase CTA.
• Increasing the number of contrast phases did not increase reading times.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- GEE :
-
Generalized estimating equations
- LGIB :
-
Lower gastrointestinal bleeding
- LR :
-
Likelihood ratio
References
Farrell JJ, Friedman LS (2005) Review article: The management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 21:1281–1298
Laine L, Yang H, Chang SC, Datto C (2012) Trends for incidence of hospitalization and death due to GI complications in the United States from 2001 to 2009. Am J Gastroenterol 107:1190–1195
Longstreth GF (1997) Epidemiology and outcome of patients hospitalized with acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 92:419–424
Strate LL, Naumann CR (2010) The role of colonoscopy and radiological procedures in the management of acute lower intestinal bleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:333–e44
Zurkiya O, Walker TG (2015) Angiographic evaluation and management of nonvariceal gastrointestinal hemorrhage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:753–763
Alavi A, Dann RW, Baum S, Biery DN (1977) Scintigraphic detection of acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Radiology 124:753–756
Currie GM, Towers PA, Wheat JM (2006) Improved detection and localization of lower gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage by subtraction scintigraphy: phantom analysis. J Nucl Med Technol 34:160–168
Dusold R, Burke K, Carpentier W, Dyck WP (1994) The accuracy of technetium-99m–labeled red cell scintigraphy in localizing gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 89:345–348
Yoon W, Jeong YY, Shin SS et al (2006) Acute massive gastrointestinal bleeding: detection and localization with arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 239:160–167
Martí M, Artigas JM, Garzón G, Alvarez-Sala R, Soto JA (2012) Acute lower intestinal bleeding: feasibility and diagnostic performance of CT angiography. Radiology 262:109–116
Jaeckle T, Stuber G, Hoffmann MHK, Jeltsch M, Schmitz BL, Aschoff AJ (2008) Detection and localization of acute upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. Eur Radiol 18:1406–1413
Jacovides CL, Nadolski G, Allen SR et al (2015) Arteriography for lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage: role of preceding abdominal computed tomographic angiogram in diagnosis and localization. JAMA Surg 150:650–656
Clerc D, Grass F, Schäfer M, Denys A, Demartines N, Hübner M (2017) Lower gastrointestinal bleeding: computed tomographic angiography, colonoscopy or both? World J Emerg Surg. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0112-3
Laing CJ, Tobias T, Rosenblum DI, Banker WL, Tseng L, Tamarkin SW (2007) Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: emerging role of multidetector CT angiography and review of current imaging techniques. Radiographics 27:1055–1070
Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2007) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Press, Cary
Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE (1992) Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 27:723–731
Obuchowski NA, Rockette HE (1995) Hypothesis testing of diagnostic accuracy for multiple readers and multiple tests: an ANOVA approach with dependent observations. Commun Statist Simula 24:285–308
Hillis SL, Obuchowski NA, Schartz KM, Berbaum KS (2005) A comparison of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz and Obuchowski-Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data. Stat Med 24:1579–1607
Hillis SL (2007) A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis. Stat Med 26:596–619
Hillis SL, Berbaum KS, Metz CE (2008) Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis. Acad Radiol 15:647–661
Kim JW, Shin SS, Yoon W et al (2011) Diagnosis of acute gastrointestinal bleeding: comparison of the arterial, the portal, and the combined set using 64-section computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35:206–211
Stuber T, Hoffmann MHK, Stuber G, Klass O, Feuerlein S, Aschoff AJ (2009) Pitfalls in detection of acute gastrointestinal bleeding with multidetector row helical CT. Abdom Imaging 34:476–482
Dobritz M, Engels HP, Schneider A, Bauer J, Rummeny EJ (2009) Detection of intestinal bleeding with multi-detector row CT in an experimental setup: how many acquisitions are necessary? Eur Radiol 19:2862–2869
Steiner K, Gollub F, Stuart S, Papadopoulou A, Woodward N (2011) Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: CT angiography with multi-planar reformatting. Abdom Imaging 36:115–125
Artigas JM, Marti M, Soto JA, Esteban H, Pinilla I, Guillén E (2013) Multidetector CT angiography for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: technique and findings. Radiographics 33:1453–1470
Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:2078–2086
Sauter AP, Muenzel D, Dangelmaier J et al (2018) Dual-layer spectral computed tomography: virtual non-contrast in comparison to true non-contrast images. Eur J Radiol 104:108–114
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Matthew Pouw, MD.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
Grayson Baird, PhD, has significant statistical expertise and kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript.
Informed consent
Verbal consent was obtained from each participating radiologist and informed consent from patients on whom CTA examinations were obtained was waived by the Institutional Review Board given the retrospective nature of the review.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
Methodology
• retrospective
• experimental
• performed at one institution
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 6.87 MB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pouw, M.E., Albright, J.W., Kozhimala, M.J. et al. Adding non-contrast and delayed phases increases the diagnostic performance of arterial CTA for suspected active lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Eur Radiol 32, 4638–4646 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08559-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08559-z