Abstract
We compared the cost effectiveness of recent approaches [coronary angiography and calcium scoring using computed tomography (CT) and stress magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] to the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) with those of the traditional diagnostic modalities [conventional angiography (CATH), exercise ECG, and stress echocardiography] using a decision tree model. For patients with a 10% to 50% pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease, non-invasive coronary angiography using CT was the most cost effective approach, with costs per correctly identified CAD patient of €4,435 (10% likelihood) to €1,469 (50% likelihood). Only for a pretest likelihood of 30% to 40% was calcium scoring using CT more cost effective than any of the traditional diagnostic modalities, while MRI was not cost effective for any pretest likelihood. At a pretest likelihood of 60%, CT coronary angiography and CATH were equally effective, while CATH was most cost effective for a pretest likelihood of at least 70%. In conclusion, up to a pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease of 50%, CT coronary angiography is the most cost-effective procedure, being superior to the other new modalities and the most commonly used traditional diagnostic modalities. With a very high likelihood for disease (above 60%), CATH is the most effective procedure from the perspective of society.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Drummond MF, Jefferson TO (1996) Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ economic evaluation working party. BMJ 313:275–283
Lipton MJ, Metz CE (2000) Cost effectiveness in radiology. Eur Radiol 10 [Suppl 3]:S390–S392
McNeil BJ (2000) Changing roles of decision analysis and cost effectiveness analyses in medicine and radiology. Eur Radiol 10 [Suppl 3]:S340–S343
Garber AM, Solomon NA (1999) Cost effectiveness of alternative test strategies for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 130:719–728
Kuntz KM, Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Douglas PS (1999) Cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with chest pain. Ann Intern Med 130:709–718
Patterson RE, Eng C, Horowitz SF, Gorlin R, Goldstein SR (1984) Bayesian comparison of cost effectiveness of different clinical approaches to diagnose coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 4:278–289
Patterson RE, Eisner RL, Horowitz SF (1995) Comparison of cost effectiveness and utility of exercise ECG, single photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and coronary angiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Circulation 91:54–65
Dewey M, Hamm B (2003) Cost effectiveness in diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Fortschr Rontgenstr 175:749–751
Rumberger JA, Behrenbeck T, Breen JF, Sheedy PF 2nd (1999) Coronary calcification by electron beam computed tomography and obstructive coronary artery disease: a model for costs and effectiveness of diagnosis as compared with conventional cardiac testing methods. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:453–462
Alanen J, Keski-Nisula L, Blanco-Sequeiros R, Tervonen O (2004) Cost comparison analysis of low-field (0.23 T) MRI- and CT-guided bone biopsies. Eur Radiol 14:123–128
Heller D, Hricak H (2000) Cost effectiveness of new technologies for staging endometrial cancer. Eur Radiol 10 [Suppl 3]:S381–S385
Hövels AM, Heesakkers RA, Adang EM, Jager GJ, Barentsz JO (2004) Cost-analysis of staging methods for lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: MRI with a lymph node-specific contrast agent compared to pelvic lymph node dissection or CT. Eur Radiol 14:1707–1712
Becker CR (2005) Coronary CT angiography in symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol 15 [Suppl 2]:B33–B41
Bogaert J, Dymarkowski S (2005) Delayed contrast-enhanced MRI: use in myocardial viability assessment and other cardiac pathology. Eur Radiol 15 [Suppl 2]:B52–B58
Dewey M, Borges AC, Kivelitz D et al (2004) Coronary artery disease: new insights and their implications for radiology. Eur Radiol 14:1048–1054
Lipton MJ, Bogaert J, Boxt LM, Reba RC (2002) Imaging of ischemic heart disease. Eur Radiol 12:1061–1080
Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol:1–8
Klever-Deichert G, Hinzpeter B, Hunsche E, Lauterbach KW (1999) Costs of coronary heart diseases over the remaining life time in coronary heart disease cases—an analysis of the current status of coronary heart disease cases in Germany from the social perspective. Z Kardiol 88:991–1000
Dewey M, Hamm B (2004) Comparison of the cost effectiveness of the most common diagnostic methods for coronary artery disease. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 129:1415–1419
Diamond GA, Forrester JS (1979) Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 300:1350–1358
Pryor DB, Shaw L, McCants CB et al (1993) Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 118:81–90
Horiguchi J, Fukuda H, Yamamoto H et al (2006) The impact of motion artifacts on the reproducibility of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements. Eur Radiol. DOI 10.1007/s00330-006-0278-2
Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruch G, Koos R et al (2006) Influence of a small field-of-view size on the detection of coronary artery calcifications with MSCT: in vitro and in vivo study. Eur Radiol 16:358–364
Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K (2005) Basics of cardiac MDCT: techniques and contrast application. Eur Radiol 15 [Suppl 2]:B2–B9
Nallamothu BK, Saint S, Bielak LF et al (2001) Electron-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 161:833–838
Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W et al (1999) Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation 99:763–770
Sommer T, Hofer U, Omran H, Schild H (2002) Stress cine MRI for detection of coronary artery disease. Fortschr Roentgenstr 174:605–613
Kwok Y, Kim C, Grady D, Segal M, Redberg R (1999) Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women. Am J Cardiol 83:660–666
Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Beasley JW et al (1997) ACC/AHA Guidelines for exercise testing. A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). J Am Coll Cardiol 30:260–311
Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM, Douglas PS (1998) Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. JAMA 280:913–920
Geleijnse ML, Fioretti PM, Roelandt JR (1997) Methodology, feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 30:595–606
Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K (1990) Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese committee on the safety of contrast media. Radiology 175:621–628
Hiro J, Hiro T, Reid CL, Ebrahimi R, Matsuzaki M, Gardin JM (1997) Safety and results of dobutamine stress echocardiography in women versus men and in patients older and younger than 75 years of age. Am J Cardiol 80:1014–1020
Mertes H, Sawada SG, Ryan T et al (1993) Symptoms, adverse effects, and complications associated with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Experience in 1118 patients. Circulation 88:15–19
Picano E, Mathias W Jr, Pingitore A, Bigi R, Previtali M (1994) Safety and tolerability of dobutamine–atropine stress echocardiography: a prospective, multicentre study. Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative Study Group. Lancet 344:1190–1192
Secknus MA, Marwick TH (1997) Evolution of dobutamine echocardiography protocols and indications: safety and side effects in 3011 studies over 5 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:1234–1240
Bundesgeschäftsstelle, Qualitätssicherung. BQS Qualitätsreport 2001. http://www.bqs-online.de, pp 88–95
Noto TJ Jr, Johnson LW, Krone R et al (1991) Cardiac catheterization 1990: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I). Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 24:75–83
Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama PM, de Feyter PJ (2002) Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 106:2051–2054
Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al (2003) Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107:664–666
Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K et al (2004) Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:2265–2270
Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC et al (2004) Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient-versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 110:2638–2643
Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP et al (2005) Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:128–132
Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL et al (2005) Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 293:2471–2478
Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D et al (2006) Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med (in press)
Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pohle FK et al (2005) Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16×0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation. Eur Heart J (Epub)
Kefer J, Coche E, Legros G et al (2005) Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:92–100
Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147–154
Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D’Eliseo A et al (2004) Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 25:1043–1048
Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557
Kassenärztliche, Bundesvereinigung. Einheitlicher Bewertungsmaßstab (EBM 2000plus) 2005. http://www.ebm2000plus.de/
Tegtbur U, Machold H, Brinkmeier U, Busse M (2001) Ambulante kardiale Langzeitrehabilitation: 1-Jahres-Ergebnisse. Gesundheitswesen 63 [Suppl 1]:S39–S42
OECD. GDP per capita, 2001. In: OECD, 2003
Gandjour A, Lauterbach KW (2002) Cost effectiveness of quality improvement measures in health care. Med Klin 97:499–502
Elkin M (1982) President’s address. Issues in radiology related to the new technologies. Radiology 143:1–6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dewey, M., Hamm, B. Cost effectiveness of coronary angiography and calcium scoring using CT and stress MRI for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 17, 1301–1309 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0439-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0439-3