Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation into patient doses for intravenous urography and proposed Irish diagnostic reference levels

  • Physics
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

With the introduction of Council Directive 97/43/Euratom, all member states should establish relevant diagnostic reference levels for X-ray examinations. Diagnostic reference levels help to facilitate standardisation and optimisation within departments and attempt to reduce dose variations between hospitals. High variation of individual patient doses for plain-film examinations by up to a factor of 75 was demonstrated by a previous Irish study, which highlighted the necessity for further investigation into other examinations in Ireland. The current work aimed to establish reference values for intravenous urography (IVU) examinations, an important contributor to collective dose. Eleven Irish hospitals were randomly selected, representing 30% of the total number of hospitals. Dose-area product (DAP) readings for IVUs were recorded along with technical and procedural details. Resultant data demonstrated mean hospital and individual patient DAP variations of a factor of 4 and 58, respectively. Stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that number of images taken, method of image acquisition and patient weight were the main causal agents for dose variations recorded. A proposed diagnostic reference level of 12 Gy cm2 was established at the level of the third-quartile value of the mean hospital DAP values. This article provides evidence of large variations in DAP values for IVU examinations. It is hoped that application of the proposed DRL of 12 Gy cm2 will reduce the size of these variations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Council Directive 97/43/Euratom. Health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing Directive 84/ 466/ Euratom

  2. Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine, National Radiological Protection Board, College of Radiographers (1992) National Protocol for Patient Dose Measurements in Diagnostic Radiology, The National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon

  3. Warren-Forward HM, Haddaway MJ, Temperton DH, McCall IW (1998) Dose-area product readings for fluoroscopic and plain film examinations, including analysis of the source of variation for barium enema examinations. Br J Radiol 71:961–967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnston DA, Brennan PC (2000) Reference dose levels for patients undergoing common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Irish hospitals. Br J Radiol 73:396–402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Contento G, Malisan MR, Padovani R, Maccia C, Wall F, Shrimpton PC (1998) A comparison of diagnostic radiology practice and patient exposure in Britain, France and Italy. Br J Radiol 61:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hart D, Hillier MC, Wall BF, Shrimpton PC, Bungay D (1996) Dose to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK 1995 review, NRPB-R289. National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon

  7. National Radiological Protection Board (2002) Radiation exposure of the UK population from medical and dental X-ray examinations, NRPB-W4. National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon

  8. European Commission (1999) Radiation Protection 109 Guidance on diagnostic reference dose levels (DRLs) for medical exposure. European Communities Publications

  9. Muller M, Heicappell R, Steiner U, Merkle E, Aschoff AJ, Miller K (1998) The average dose-area product at intravenous urography in 205 adults. Br J Radiol 71:210–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Daniels SJ, Brennan PC (1996) A comparison of tomography and zonography during intravenous urography. Radiography 2:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Busch HP, Georgi M (1992) Digital radiography: clinical experience with digital image intensifier and storage phosphor radiography, Blackwell, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kopp J, Maiter W, Losereit C (1995) Radiation exposure of patients by using modern digital fluoroscopy systems. Radiat Prot Dosim 57:487–488

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements.

The authors thank all of the superintendent radiographers and radiographers involved for their commitment to the study. Thanks also go to Dr. M. Casey, Principal Medical Physicist, Professor Lee, Consultant Radiologist, and Professor Leslie Daly, epidemiologist and statistician. The authors also and thank the Irish Health Research Board which fully funded this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UCD School of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Anthony's, Herbert Avenue, Dublin 4, Ireland

    E. M. Carroll & P. C. Brennan

Authors
  1. E. M. Carroll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. C. Brennan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. C. Brennan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carroll, E.M., Brennan, P.C. Investigation into patient doses for intravenous urography and proposed Irish diagnostic reference levels. Eur Radiol 13, 1529–1533 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1792-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1792-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation