Abstract
Several studies have attempted to identify the selective pressures leading to reversed size dimorphism (RSD), a characteristic of skuas and of a wide range of bird species with a raptorial lifestyle. One of the prevailing hypotheses posits that females in species of aggressive and well-armed males should select males that are smaller than themselves, to avoid injuries during pair formation and mating. This hypothesis predicts assortative mating by size in such species, and in previous research, this was confirmed to occur in two skua species. This study presents, for the first time, biometric data for Falkland Skuas Stercorarius antarcticus antarcticus based on large sample sizes. Despite the clear RSD, we found no assortative mating by size, which could be related to the low divorce rates and few opportunities for mate selection in this population. Our results highlight the need for further work to find an explanatory hypothesis for the evolution and maintenance of reversed size dimorphism in skuas.
Data availability
Data are available upon request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Andersson M, Norberg RÅ (1981) Evolution of reversed sexual size dimorphism and role partitioning among predatory birds, with a size scaling of flight performance. Biol J Linn Soc 15:105–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1981.tb00752.x
Barrett RT, Fieler R, Anker-Nilssen T, Rikardsen F (1985) Measurements and weight changes of Norwegian adult puffins Fratercula arctica and kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla during the breeding season. Ringing Migr 6:102–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03078698.1985.9673865
Barth EK (1967) Standard body measurements in Larus argentatus, L. fuscus, L. canus, and L. marinus. Nytt Mag Zool 14:7–83
Catry P, Furness RW (1997) Egg volume and within-clutch asymmetry in great skuas: are they related to adult quality? Colon Waterbird 20:399–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/1521589
Catry P, Ratcliffe N, Furness RW (1997) Partnerships and mechanisms of divorce in the Great Skua. Anim Behav 54:1475–1482. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0552
Catry P, Phillips RA, Furness RW (1999) Evolution of reversed sexual size dimorphism in skuas and jaegers. Auk 116:158–168. https://doi.org/10.2307/4089462
Catry P, Almeida A, Lecoq M, Granadeiro JP, Matias R (2011) Low breeding success and sharp population decline at the largest known Falkland Skua colony. Polar Biol 34:1239–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-011-0978-1
Cohen J (1992) Statistical power analysis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 1:98–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
Fairbairn J, Shine R (1993) Patterns of sexual size dimorphism in seabirds of the Southern Hemisphere. Oikos 68:139–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545319
Fridolfsson AK, Ellegren H (1999) A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol 30:116–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/3677252
Furness RW (1987) The skuas. T & AD Poyser, Calton
Furness RW (1996) The Stercorariidae. In: Handbook of the birds of the world 3. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp 556–571
Hakkarainen H, Korpimäki E (1991) Reversed sexual size dimorphism in Tengmalm’s owl: is small male size adaptive? Oikos 61:337–346. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545241
Hamilton JE (1934) The sub-antarctic forms of the Great Skua (Catharacta skua skua). Discov Rep 9:161–174
Heswall AM, Friesen MR, Martin AB, Gaskett AC (2021) Seabird bycatch risk correlates with body size, and relatively larger skulls, bills, wings and sensory structures. Mar Biol 168:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-021-03873-4
Mancini PL, Hobson KA, Bugoni L (2014) Role of body size in shaping the trophic structure of tropical seabird communities. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 497:243–257. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10589
Marti CD (1990) Sex and age dimorphism in the Barn Owl and a test of mate choice. Auk 107:246–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/4087606
Mercier G, Yoccoz NG, Descamps S (2021) Influence of reproductive output on divorce rates in polar seabirds. Ecol Evol 11:12989–13000. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7775
Mueller HC (1990) The evolution of reversed sexual dimorphism in size in monogamous species of birds. Biol Rev 65:553–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1990.tb01238.x
Phillips RA (1995) Population ecology of Arctic skuas Stercorarius parasiticus, on Foula. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow
Phillips RA, Dawson DA, Ross DJ (2002) Mating patterns and reversed size dimorphism in Southern skuas (Stercorarius skua lonnbergi). Auk 119:858–863. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/119.3.858
Reinhardt K, Hahn S, Peter HU, Wemhoff H (2000) A review of the diets of Southern Hemisphere skuas. Mar Ornithol 28:7–19
Rising JD, Somers KM (1989) The measurement of overall body size in birds. Auk 106:666–674. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/106.4.666
Slagsvold T, Sandvik J, Rofstad G, Lorentsen Ö, Husby M (1984) On the adaptive value of intraclutch egg-size variation in birds. Auk 101:685–697. https://doi.org/10.2307/4086895
Smith SM (1982) Raptor “reverse” dimorphism revisited: a new hypothesis. Oikos 39:118–122. https://doi.org/10.2307/3544542
Wood RC (1971) Population dynamics of breeding South Polar Skuas of unknown age. Auk 88:805–814. https://doi.org/10.2307/4083839
Acknowledgements
To all who helped with fieldwork along the years, particularly Ian Strange, Georgina Strange, Miguel Lecoq, José Pedro Granadeiro, Letizia Campioni, Francesco Ventura and Amanda Kuepfer. The New Island Conservation Trust, and more recently Falklands Conservation supported field studies on New Island through the supply of research facilities. We also acknowledge helpful comments and suggestions provided by the referee Jeroen C. S. Creuwels and one anonymous referee.
Funding
This work was funded by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) through the projects: UIDB/04292/2020 and UIDP/04292/2020, granted to MARE. The Falkland Islands Government provided formal permits and funding through the Environmental Studies Budget.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PC designed and coordinated the research and carried out fieldwork. CP analysed the data. CP and PC jointly wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The authors adhered to all relevant laws, regulations, and protocols in conducting this research.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pich, C., Catry, P. Body size, assortative mating and divorce rates in a little-known skua taxon, the Falkland Skua Stercorarius antarcticus antarcticus. Polar Biol 45, 959–963 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-022-03035-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-022-03035-2