Abstract
Fulmarine petrels are top predators in the Antarctic region preying mostly on squid, fish, and carrion. Their diets have been widely studied, but less is known about the role of skeletal structures in the processes they use to obtain food. Here, we comparatively describe the skulls of fulmarine petrels, namely, the Giant Petrels (Macronectes), the Southern Fulmar (Fulmarus glacialoides), and the Cape Petrel (Daption capense), emphasizing those structures associated with the muscles responsible for opening/closing the jaws. The skull is dorsoventrally flattened and the bill is hooked-tipped and elongated in the studied species, but we found significant differences for relative bill length and relative cranium depth among them. These characteristics can be related to surface seizing and streamlining for diving and pursuing/capturing prey underwater. Longer bills also indicate that the mandible muscles are more posteriorly positioned relative to the bill tip, an adaptation for a fast bite, which is more pronounced in Giant Petrels. Nevertheless, there are broad areas of origin for the mandible muscles in the fossa musculorum temporalium and in the Os palatinum, especially in Giant Petrels. We thus infer that those muscles are well developed and hypothesize that, despite the adaptation for fast movements, their jaws are still capable of a relatively powerful bite. The Giant Petrels and Cape Petrel present a similar pattern of dorsoventral flattening of the skull, an adaptation for diving in pursuit of prey. In Giant Petrels, a flattened skull with a hooked-tipped bill also facilitates their feeding behavior of inserting the bill and head into carcasses for tearing flesh. We conclude that fulmarine petrels present variable morphological characters adapted to the different feeding strategies they employ in the Antarctic and the Southern Ocean.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Raw data were generated at UFRGS and are available as Electronic Supplementary Material.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Acosta Hospitaleche C, Piro A, Sosa A (2020) The mandibulosphenoidal joint in penguins, albatrosses, and petrels: comparative anatomy and functional implications. Vertebr Zool 70(3):263–274. https://doi.org/10.26049/VZ70-3-2020-01
Arnould JPY, Whitehead MD (1991) The diet of Antarctic petrels, cape petrels and southern fulmars rearing chicks in Prydz Bay. Antarc Sci 3:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102091000056
Ashmole NP (1968) Body size, prey size and ecological segregation in five sympatric tropical terns. Syst Zool 17:292–304. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412008
Baumel JJ, Raikow RJ (1993) Arthrologia. In: King AS, Breazile JE, Evans HE, Vanden Berge JC (eds) Handbook of avian anatomy: nomina anatomica avium. Nuttall Ornithological Club, Cambridge, pp 133–187
Baumel JJ, Witmer LM (1993) Osteologia. In: King AS, Breazile JE, Evans HE, Vanden Berge JC (eds) Handbook of avian anatomy: nomina anatomica avium. Nuttall Ornithological Club, Cambridge, pp 45–132
Bock WJ (1964) Kinetics of the avian skull. J Morphol 114:1–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051140102
Bock WJ, Morioka H (1971) Morphology and evolution of the ectethmoid-mandibular articulation in the meliphagidae (Aves). J Morphol 135:13–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051350103
Bout RG, Zweers GA (2001) The role of cranial kinesis in birds. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 131(1):197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1095-6433(01)00470-6
Burger AE (1978) Functional anatomy of the feeding apparatus of four South African cormorants. Zool Afr 13:81–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00445096.1978.11447608
Burton PJK (1974) Feeding and the feeding apparatus in waders: a study of anatomy and adaptations in the Charadrii. Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), London
Bühler P (1981) The functional anatomy of the avian jaw apparatus. In: King AS, McLelland J (eds) Form and function in birds, vol 2. Academic Press, London, pp 439–468
Carlos CJ (2009) Seabird diversity in Brazil: a review. Sea Swallow 58:17–46
Carlos CJ, Alvarenga JG, Mazzochi MS (2017) Osteology of the feeding apparatus of magnificent Frigatebird Fregata magnificens and Brown Booby Sula leucogaster (Aves: Suliformes). Pap Avulsos Zool 57:265–274. https://doi.org/10.11606/0031-1049.2017.57.20
Chávez-Hoffmeister M (2020) Bill disparity and feeding strategies among fossil and modern penguins. Paleobiology 46(2):176–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/pab.2020.10
Cracraft J (1968) The lacrimal-ectethmoid bone complex in birds: a single character analysis. Am Midl Nat 80:316–359. https://doi.org/10.2307/2423530
Creet S, Van Franeker JA, Van Spanje TM, Wolff WJ (1994) Diet of the Pintado Petrel Daption capense at King George Island, Antarctica, 1990/91. Mar Ornithol 22:221–229
Croxall JP, Prince PA (1980) Food, feeding ecology and ecological segregation of seabirds at South Georgia. Biol J Linn Soc 14:103–131
Dénes FV, Silveira LF (2007) Cranial osteology and taxonomy of albatrosses of genus Diomedea Linneaus, 1758 and Thalassarche Reichenbach, 1853 (Procellariformes: Diomedeidae). Pap Avulsos Zool 47:43–61. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0031-10492007000300001
Donatelli RJ (1996) The jaw apparatus of the neotropical and of the afrotropical woodpeckers (Aves: Piciformes). Arq Zool 33:1–70. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7793.v33i1p1-70
Donatelli RJ, Höfling E, Catalano AL (2014) Relationship between jaw apparatus, feeding habit, and food source in oriental woodpeckers. Zool Sci 31:223–227. https://doi.org/10.2108/zs130146
Estrella SM, Masero JA (2007) The use of distal rhynchokinesis by birds feeding in water. J Exp Biol 210(21):3757–3762. https://doi.org/10.2108/zs130146
Evans AR, Pineda-Munoz S (2018) Inferring mammal dietary ecology from dental morphology. In: Croft DA, Su DF, Simpson SW (eds) Methods in paleoecology: reconstructing cenozoic terrestrial environments and ecological communities. Springer, Cham, pp 37–51
Ferreira MMD, Tambussi CP, Degrange FJ, Pestoni S, Tirao GA (2018) The cranio-mandibular complex of the nightjar Systellura longirostris (Aves, Caprimulgiformes): functional relationship between osteology, myology and feeding. Zoology 132:6–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2018.11.001
Fonseca VSS, Petry MV (2007) Evidence of food items used by Fulmarus glacialoides (Smith, 1840) (Procellariiformes: Procellariidae) in Southern Brazil. Polar Biol 30:317–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-006-0185-7
van Franeker JA, ter Braak CJF (1993) A generalized discriminant for sexing fulmarine petrels from external measurements. Auk 110(3):492–502. https://doi.org/10.2307/4088413
Genbrugge A, Herrel A, Boone M, Van Hoorebeke L, Podos J, Dirckx J, Aerts P, Dominique A (2011) The head of the finch: the anatomy of the feeding system in two species of finches (Geospiza fortis and Padda oryzivora). J Anat 219:676–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01437.x
González-Solís J (2004) Sexual size dimorphism in northern giant petrels: ecological correlates and scaling. Oikos 105:247–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12997.x
Goodman HI, Fisher DC (1962) Functional anatomy of the feeding apparatus in waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae). Illinois University Press, Carbondale
Grohmann Finger JV, Corá DH, Petry MV, Krüger L (2021) Cannibalism in southern giant petrels (Macronectes giganteus) at Nelson Island, Maritime Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biol 44:1219–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-021-02859-8
Harper PC (1987) Feeding behaviour and other notes on 20 species of Procellariiformes at sea. Notornis 34:169–192
Hildebrand M, Goslow GE (2006) Análise da Estrutura dos Vertebrados. Atheneu, Rio de Janeiro
Hodum PJ, Hobson KA (2000) Trophic relationships among Antarctic fulmarine petrels: insights into dietary overlap and chick provisioning strategies inferred from stable-isotope (δ15N and δ13C) analyses. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 198:273–281. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps198273
Hunter S (1983) The food and feeding ecology of the Giant Petrels Macronectes halli and M. giganteus at South Georgia. J Zool 200(4):521–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1983.tb02813.x
Hunter S, Brooke ML (1992) The diet of giant Petrels Macronectes spp. at Marion Island, Southern Indian Ocean. Colon Waterbirds 15:56–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1521354
Kuroda N (1954) On the classification and phylogeny of the order Tubinares, particularly the shearwaters (Puffinus), with special considarations (sic) on their osteology and habit differentiation. The author, Tokyo
Livezey BC, Zusi RL (2006) Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy: I.—Methods and characters. Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh
Livezey BC, Zusi RL (2007) Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion. Zool J Linn Soc 149:1–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00293.x
Morales-García NM, Gill PG, Janis CM, Rayfield EJ (2021) Jaw shape and mechanical advantage are indicative of diet in Mesozoic mammals. Commun Biol 4:242. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01757-3
Onley D, Scofield P (2007) Albatrosses, petrels and shearwaters of the world. Bloomsbury Publishing, London
Owre OT (1967) Adaptations for locomotion and feeding in the anhinga and the double-crested cormorants. Ornithol Monogr 6:1–138. https://doi.org/10.2307/40166666
Piro A, Acosta Hospitaleche C (2018) Skull morphology and ontogenetic variation of the Southern Giant Petrel Macronectes giganteus (Aves: Procellariiformes). Polar Biol 42:27–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2397-z
Posso SR, Donatelli RJ (2005) Skull and mandible formation in the cuckoo (Aves, Cuculidae): contributions to the nomenclature in avian osteology and systematics. Eur J Morphol 4(5):163–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243860500315507
Previatto DM, Posso SR (2015a) Jaw musculature of Cyclarhis gujanensis (Aves: Vireonidae). Braz J Biol 75:655–661. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.20113
Previatto DM, Posso SR (2015b) Cranial osteology of Cyclarhis gujanensis (Aves: Vireonidae). Pap Avulsos Zool 55:255–260. https://doi.org/10.1590/0031-1049.2015.55.18
Prince PA, Morgan RA (1987) Diet and feeding ecology of Procellariiformes. In: Croxall JP (ed) Seabirds: feeding biology and role in marine ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 135–172
Pycraft WP (1899) Contributions to the Osteology of Birds. Part III. Turbinares. Proc Zool Soc Lond 1899:381–411
R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Austria, Vienna
Raikow J (1970) Evolution of diving adaptations in the stifftail ducks. University of California Press, Berkeley
Rau GH, Ainley DG, Bengston JL, Torres JJ, Hopkins TL (1992) 15N/14N and 13C/12C in Weddell Sea birds, seals, and fish: implications for diet and trophic structure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 84:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps084001
Richards LP, Bock W (1973) Functional anatomy and adaptive evolution of the feeding apparatus in the Hawaiian Honeycreeper genus Loxops (Drepanididae). Ornithol Monogr 15:1–173. https://doi.org/10.2307/40166695
Risi MM, Jones CW, Osborne AM, Steinfurth A, Oppel S (2021) Southern Giant Petrels Macronectes giganteus depredating breeding Atlantic Yellow-nosed Albatrosses Thalassarche chlororhynchos on Gough Island. Polar Biol 44:593–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-021-02810-x
Ryan PG, Sommer E, Breytenbach E (2008) Giant Petrels Macronectes hunting Northern Rockhopper Penguins Eudyptes moseleyi at Sea. Ardea 96:129–134. https://doi.org/10.5253/078.096.0116
Shealer DA (2002) Foraging behavior and food of seabirds. In: Schreiber EA, Burger J (eds) Biology of marine birds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 137–177
Shufeldt RW (1907) On the osteology of the Tubinares. Am Nat XLI:109–124
Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE (1990) Phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven
Towers JR, Gasco N (2020) Giant petrels (Macronectes spp.) prey on depredating sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus). Polar Biol 43:919–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-020-02687-2
van den Hoff J, Newbery K (2006) Southern Giant Petrels Macronectes giganteus diving on submerged carrion. Mar Ornithol 34(1):61–64
Vanden Berge JC, Zweers GA (1993) Myologia. In: King AS, Breazile JE, Evans HE, Vanden Berge JC (eds) Handbook of avian anatomy: nomina anatomica avium. Nuttall Ornithological Club, Cambridge, pp 189–247
Vaske Júnior T (2011) Are deep-sea cephalopods really common preys (sic) for oceanic seabirds? Biota Neotrop 11:177–180. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032011000100018
Voss NA, Nesis KN, Rodhouse PG (1998) The cephalopod family Histioteuthidae (Oegopsida): systematics, biology, and biogeography. Smithson Contrib Zool 586:293–372
Weidinger K, van Franeker JA (1993) Applicability of external measures to sexing of the Cape Petrel Daption capense at within-pair, within-population and between-population scales. J Zool Lond 245:473–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00122.x
Winkler DW, Billerman SM, Lovette IJ (2020) Shearwaters and Petrels (Procellariidae), version 1.0. In: Billerman SM, Keeney BK, Rodewald PG, Schulenberg TS (eds) Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.procel3.01
Zusi RL (1962) Structural adaptations of the head and neck in the black skimmer. Nuttall Ornithological Club, Cambridge
Zusi RL (1967) The role of the depressor mandibulae muscle in kinesis of the avian skull. Proc US Natl Mus 123:1–28. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.123-3607.1
Zusi RL, Livezey BC (2000) Homology and phylogenetic implications of some enigmatic cranial features in galliform and anseriform birds. Ann Carnegie Mus 69:157–193
Zusi RL, Livezey BC (2006) Variation in the os palatinum and its structural relation to the Palatum osseum of birds (Aves). Ann Carnegie Mus 75:137–180. https://doi.org/10.2992/0097-4463(2006)75[137:VITOPA]2.0.CO;2
Acknowledgements
We thank Janaína C. Wickert and Maurício Tavares (MUCIN), Glayson A. Bencke (MCN), and Carla S. Fontana (MCP) for allowing us to study the specimens under their care. We are also grateful to Gabriela de Souza Pinto Arnoso (UFRGS) who elaborated Fig. 5. The manuscript benefited from reviews by Carolina Acosta Hospitaleche and three anonymous reviewers and the editorial advice of Dieter Piepenburg. MSM received an undergraduate fellowship from the Programa de Iniciação Científica BIC/UFRGS. CJC is supported by a Postdoctoral fellowship from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).
Funding
This research received support from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MSM and CJC conceived and designed research. MSM and CJC examined and described specimens. MSM photographed and measured specimens and conducted the statistical analysis. MSM and CJC wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All studied specimens are deposited in scientific collections and museums; therefore, no ethical approval is required.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix
Appendix
Specimens examined: Macronectes halli—DZ-UFRGS 001, 003, 004, 005; MUCIN 048, 050; Macronectes giganteus—DZ-UFRGS 002, 006; MCP 1622; MUCIN 047, 049; Macronectes sp.—MCN 622, 423; MCP 1518, 1486; Fulmarus glacialoides—MUCIN 0800, 0830, 0866, 0929; MCN 24, 381, 382, 464, 576; MCP 0851, 1661, 1666, 1680, 1681, 2280, 2677; and Daption capense—MUCIN 0367, 0540, 0602, 0691, 0755, 0973; MCN 384, 572; MCP 0575, 0585.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mazzochi, M.S., Carlos, C.J. Skull morphology of four Antarctic fulmarine petrels (Aves: Procellariiformes): insights into their feeding biology. Polar Biol 45, 191–201 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-021-02983-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-021-02983-5