Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we planned to investigate the effects of pulse electromagnetic field (PEMF) on pain relief and functional capacity of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Fifty-five patients with knee OA were included in a randomized, placebo-controlled study. At the end of the therapy, there was statistically significant improvement in pain scores in both groups (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed within the groups (P > 0.05). We observed statistically significant improvement in some of the subgroups of Lequesne index. These are morning stiffness and activities of daily living activities compared to placebo group. However, we could not observe statistically significant differences in total of the scale between two groups (P > 0.05). Applying between-group analysis, we were unable to demonstrate a beneficial symptomatic effect of PEMF in the treatment of knee OA in all patients. Further studies using different types of magnetic devices, treatment protocols and patient populations are warranted to confirm the general efficacy of PEMF therapy in OA and other conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wolheim FA (2003) Pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. In: Klippel JH, Dieppe PA (eds) Rheumatology, 3rd edn. Mosby, London, pp 1801–1816

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brandt KD (2001) Management of osteoarthritis. In: Ruddy S, Haris ED (eds) Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology, 6th edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1419–1433

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rush PJ, Shore A (1994) Physician perception of the value of physical modalities in the treatment of musculoskeletal disease. Br J Rheumatol 33:566–568. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/33.6.566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pipitone N, Scott DL (2001) Magnetic Pulse Treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Curr Med Res Opin 17(3):190–196. doi:10.1185/03007990152673828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leclaire R, Bourgoin J (1991) Electromagnetic treatment of shoulder periarthritis: a randomized controlled trial of the efficiency and tolerance of magnetotherapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72:284–287

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis Guidelines (2000) Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: 2000 update. Arth Rheum 43(9):1905–1915. doi :10.1002/1529-0131(200009)43:9<1905::AID-ANR1>3.0.CO;2-P

  7. Altman R, Asch E, Black D et al (1986) Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 29:1039–1049. doi:10.1002/art.1780290816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kellgren JK, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 15:494–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawrence JS, Bremmer JM, Brer F (1966) Osteoarthritis prevalence in the population and relationship between symptoms and X-ray changes. Ann Rheum Dis 25:1–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rejeski WJ, Ettinger WH, Shumaker S et al (1995) The evaluation of pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: the knee pain scale. J Rheumatol 22(6):1124–1129

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lequesne MG, Samson S (1991) Indices of severity in osteoarthritis for weight bearing joints. J Rheumatol 18(Suppl 27):16–28

    Google Scholar 

  12. Williams HJ, Ward JR, Egger MJ et al (1993) Comparison of naproxen and acetaminophen in a two year study of treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 36:1196–1206. doi:10.1002/art.1780360904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ledingham J, Regan M, Jones A et al (1993) Radiographic patterns and associations of osteoarthritis of the knee in patients referred to hospital. Ann Rheum Dis 52:520–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hochberg MC, Lawrence RC, Everett DF et al (1989) Epidemiologic associations of pain in osteoarthritis of the knee. Semin Arthritis Rheum 18:4–9. doi:10.1016/0049-0172(89)90008-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Trock HD (2000) Electromagnetic fields and magnets. Investigational treatment for musculoskeletal disorders. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 26(1):51–62. doi:10.1016/S0889-857X(05)70119-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Harrison MH, Bassett CA (1984) Use of pulsed electromagnetic fields in Perthes disease: report of a pilot study. J Pediatr Orthop 4(5):579–584

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bassett CA, Schink-Ascani M, Lewis SM (1989) Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on Steinberg ratings of femoral head osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 246:172–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tabrah F, Hoffmeier M, Gilbert F et al (1990) Bone density changes in osteoporosis-prone women exposed to pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs). J Bone Miner Res 5(5):437–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Devereaux MD, Hazleman BL, Thomas PP (1985) Chronic lateral humeral epicondylitis—a double-blind controlled assessment of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy. Clin Exp Rheumatol 3(4):333–336

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Trock DH, Bollet AJ, Dyer RH et al (1993) A double-blind trial of the clinical effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 20(3):456–460

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Trock HD, Bollet AJ, Markoll R (1994) The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee and cervical spine. Report of randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trials. J Rheumatol 21(10):1903–1911

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sütbeyaz ST, Sezer N, Köseoğlu BF (2006) The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of cervical osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Rheumatol Int 26:320–324. doi:10.1007/s00296-005-0600-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thamsborg G, Florescu A, Oturai P et al (2005) Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with pulsed electromagnetic fields: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Osteoarthr Cartil 13(7):575–581. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2005.02.012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saime Ay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ay, S., Evcik, D. The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatol Int 29, 663–666 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-008-0754-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-008-0754-x

Keywords

Navigation