Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Examining the psychometric characteristics of the Dutch childhood health assessment questionnaire: room for improvement?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric characteristics of the childhood health assessment questionnaire-disability index (CHAQ-DI). Seventy-six patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), age range 4.8–15.8 years, completed a CHAQ questionnaire one or more times. In total, 321 CHAQ questionnaires were available for analysis. Factor analysis and correlation were used to analyse the data. The analysis indicated that 12 items could be removed from the original 30 items of the CHAQ-DI. Also the addition of “aids and assistance” to the overall scoring method of the CHAQ-DI did not contribute to the overall measuring concept of the CHAQ-DI. The psychometric characteristics of the CHAQ-DI could be improved by removing 12 items from the original 30 items. Moreover, a simple scoring method, without the addition of aids and assistance to the total CHAQ-DI improves sensitivity to change of the CHAQ-DI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh G, Athreya BH, Fries JF, Goldsmith DP (1994) Measurement of health status in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 37:1761–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR (1980) Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 23:137–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wulffraat N, van der Net JJ, Ruperto N, Kamphuis S, Prakken BJ, Ten Cate R, et al. (2001) The Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ). Clin Exp Rheumatol 19:S111–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruce B, Fries JF (2003) The stanford health assessment questionnaire: a review of its history, issues, progress, and documentation. J Rheumatol 30:167–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giannini EH, Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Lovell DJ, Felson DT, Martini A (1997) Preliminary definition of improvement in juvenile arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 40:1202–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruperto N, Martini A (2004) International research networks in pediatric rheumatology: the PRINTO perspective. Curr Opin Rheumatol 16:566–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alman BA, Bhandari M, Wright JG (1996) Function of dislocated hips in children with lower level spina bifida. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:294–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Huber AM, Hicks JE, Lachenbruch PA, Perez MD, Zemel LS, Rennebohm RM, et al. (2001) Validation of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire in the juvenile idiopathic myopathies. Juvenile Dermatomyositis Disease Activity Collaborative Study Group. J Rheumatol 28:1106–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dempster H, Porepa M, Young N, Feldman BM (2001) The clinical meaning of functional outcome scores in children with juvenile arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 44:1768–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pouchot J, Ecosse E, Coste J, Guillemin F (2004) Validity of the childhood health assessment questionnaire is independent of age in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 51:519–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Takken T, Van der Net J, Kuis W, Helders PJ (2003) Aquatic fitness training for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology 42:1408–1414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lovell DJ, Giannini EH, Reiff A, Cawkwell GD, Silverman ED, Nocton JJ, et al. (2000) Etanercept in children with polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis Pediatric Rheumatology. Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med 342:763–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Flato B, Aasland A, Vinje O, Forre O (1998) Outcome and predictive factors in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile spondyloarthropathy. J Rheumatol 25:366–75

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Takken T, van der Net J, Helders PJ (2001) Do juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients benefit from an exercise program? A pilot study. Arthritis Rheum 45:81–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and Validity Assessment. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1996) Using Multivariate Statistics. Harper Collins College Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Whitney-Mahoney KJ, Young NL, Feldman BM, Badley EM (2001) Alternative scoring methods improve the responsiveness of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 44:S381

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lam C, Young N, Marwaha J, McLimont M, Feldman BM (2004) Revised versions of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) are more sensitive and suffer less from a ceiling effect. Arthritis Rheum 51:881–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson TR, Foley SP, Whitney-Mahoney K, Barron AC, Feldman BM, Brunner HI, et al. (2003) Measurement Properties of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) in the Evaluation of Physical Functioning in Children with Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis (JRA). Arthritis Rheum 48:s1795

    Google Scholar 

  20. Takken T, Van der Net J, Helders PJ (2003) Relationship between functional ability and physical fitness in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. Scand J Rheumatol 32:174–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Takken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takken, T., van den Eijkhof, F., Hoijtink, H. et al. Examining the psychometric characteristics of the Dutch childhood health assessment questionnaire: room for improvement?. Rheumatol Int 26, 979–983 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-006-0108-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-006-0108-5

Keywords

Navigation