Skip to main content
Log in

Public R&D project portfolio selection problem with cancellations

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we address a public R&D project portfolio selection problem with project cancellations. For several reasons, a funded R&D project may be halted before finishing the planned research. When a project is canceled, most of its budget is usually unused and also some of the spendings can return to the funding organization. In the call-based R&D programs, usually project selection decisions are made in one go, and, in the current call, it is not possible to award new projects with the unused budget. Decision-makers (DMs) of funding organizations can benefit from considering possible project cancellation situations to improve the budget utilization. We consider two cases. In the first case, we assume that cancellation probability of a project cannot be assessed but the DM can estimate the number of projects that will be canceled. In the second case, we assume that for each project, a cancellation probability can be assessed. For the first problem, we develop a mixed-integer linear programming formulation and a dynamic programming algorithm. For the second problem, we develop a chance-constrained stochastic programming formulation that can be solved as a mixed-integer second-order cone program. Our computational results show that practical-size problems can be solved by the proposed solution approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baurer H (1996) Probability Theory. De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, vol. 23. Walter de Gruyter, Transl. by Burckel, Robert B., Berlin

  • Beaujon GJ, Marin SP, McDonald GC (2001) Balancing and optimizing a portfolio of R&D projects. Naval Res Logist 48(1):18–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. Oper Res 52(1):35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duzgun R, Thiele A (2010) Robust optimization with multiple ranges: theory and application to R&D project selection. Technical Report, Lehigh University, Bethlehem

  • Eilat H, Golany B, Shtub A (2006) Constructing and evaluating balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interactions: a DEA based methodology. Eur J Oper Res 172:1018–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eser A (2014) Ar-ge ve yenilik ekosistemimiz ve mevcut kamu ar-ge destekleri. Kalkinmada Anahtar Verimlilik 301:15–17. https://anahtar.sanayi.gov.tr/tr/news/ar-ge-ve-yenilik-ekosistemimiz-ve-mevcut-kamu-ar-ge-destekleri/664

  • Gerchak Y, Kilgour DM (1999) Optimal parallel funding of research and development projects. IIE Trans 31(2):145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerchak Y, Parlar M (1999) Allocating resources to research and development projects in a competitive environment. IIE Trans 31(9):827–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupte A, Ahmed S, Cheon MS, Dey S (2013) Solving mixed integer bilinear problems using MILP formulations. SIAM J Optim 23(2):721–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenberger K, Stummer C (1999) Research and development project selection and resource allocation: a review of quantitative modelling approaches. Int J Manag Rev 1(2):197–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen AD, Traynor AJ (1999) A practical R&D project-selection scoring tool. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 46(2):158–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong Y (2013) On computing the distribution function for the Poisson binomial distribution. Comput Stat Data Anal 59:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klotz E, Newman AM (2013) Practical guidelines for solving difficult mixed integer linear programs. Surveys Oper Res Manag Sci 18(1–2):18–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll H, Stahlecker T (2012) Global review of competitive R&D funding—a project commissioned by the World Bank. Synthesis Report

  • Litvinchev IS, Lopez F, Alvarez A, Fernandez E (2010) Large-scale public R&D portfolio selection by maximizing a biobjective impact measure. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 40(3):572–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick GP (1976) Computability of global solutions to factorable nonconvex programs. 1. Convex underestimating problems. Math Program 10(2):147–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaci M, Pferschy U, Serafini P (2013) Exact solution of the robust knapsack problem. Comput Oper Res 40(11):2625–2631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR (2004) The challenge of building an effective innovation system for catch-up. Oxford Dev Studies 32(3):365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIH (2013) National Institutes of Health, Grant Policy Statements. grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/policy.htm

  • NSF (2005) National Science Foundation, Grant Policy Manual

  • Ringuest JL, Graves SB, Case RH (2004) Mean-gini analysis in R&D portfolio selection. Eur J Oper Res 154(1):157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro A, Dentcheva D, Ruszczynski A (2009) Lectures on stochastic programming: modeling and theory, 1st edn. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Solak S, Clarke JPB, Johnson EL, Barnes ER (2010) Optimization of R&D project portfolios under endogenous uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 207(1):420–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TÜBİTAK (2012) Activity report. https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/tubitak_2012_faaliyet_raporu_web.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the two anonymous referees for comments and suggestions that improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sinan Gürel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Çağlar, M., Gürel, S. Public R&D project portfolio selection problem with cancellations. OR Spectrum 39, 659–687 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-016-0468-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-016-0468-5

Keywords

Navigation