Skip to main content
Log in

Clustering clinical departments for wards to achieve a prespecified blocking probability

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When the number of available beds in a hospital is limited, it can be beneficial to cluster several clinical departments such that the probability of not being able to admit a patient is acceptably small. However, not all clinical departments can be clustered for cross-infection reasons. In addition, patients from one clinical department should not be spread out over the entire hospital as this complicates the process of doing rounds and may result in alternate level of care. In this paper, we consider a situation where wards with a fixed number of beds are given. The question is how to cluster the clinical departments and to determine the assignment of these clustered departments to the available wards such that the assigned beds are sufficient to guarantee a blocking probability below a prespecified percentage. We first give an exact formulation of the problem to be able to achieve optimal solutions. However, computational experiments show that the resulting computation times for this model are too long for it to be applicable in practice. To reduce the computation time, we introduce two heuristic solution approaches. The first heuristic uses the same formulation as the exact model, however, the number of required beds is approximated by a linear function. The resulting model is again solved by an exact solver. The second heuristic uses a restricted version of the exact model within a local search approach. Hereby, the local search is used to determine the assignment of clinical departments to clusters and the exact model is used to determine the assignment of clusters to wards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beliën J, Demeulemeester E (2007) Building cyclic master surgery schedules with leveled resulting bed occupancy. Eur J Op Res 176(2):1185–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin A, Bekker R, van Zanten L, Koole G (2010) Dimensioning hospital wards using the Erlang loss model. Ann Op Res 178(1):23–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke EK, De Causmaecker P, Van Landeghem H (2004) J Sched 7(6):441–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig GB, Wolfe P (1960) Decomposition principle for linear programs. Op Res 8(1):101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Essen JT, Bosch JM, Hans EW, van Houdenhoven M, Hurink JL (2013) Reducing the number of required beds by rearranging the OR-schedule. OR Spectr 1–21. doi:10.1007/s00291-013-0323-x

  • Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. W. H. Freeman & Co Ltd., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorunescu F, McClean SI, Millard PH (2002) A queueing model for bed-occupancy management and planning of hospitals. J Op Res Soc 53(1):19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorunescu F, McClean SI, Millard PH (2002) Using a queueing model to help plan bed allocation in a department of geriatric medicine. Health Care Manag Sci 5(4):307–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green LV, Nguyen V (2001) Strategies for cutting hospital beds: the impact on patient service. Health Serv Res 36(2):421–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper PR, Shahani AK (2002) Modelling for the planning and management of bed capacities in hospitals. J Op Res Soc 53(1):11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokangul A (2008) A combination of deterministic and stochastic approaches to optimize bed capacity in a hospital unit. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 90(1):56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapierre SD, Goldsman D, Cochran R, DuBow J (1999) Bed allocation techniques based on census data. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 33(1):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Beullens P, Jones D, Tamiz M (2009) An integrated queuing and multi-objective bed allocation model with application to a hospital in China. J Op Res Soc 60(3):330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao S, Qiao L (1998) A robust and efficient algorithm for evaluating Erlang b formula. Technical report

  • Shakhov V (2010) Simple approximation for Erlang b formula. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE Region 8th international conference on computational technologies in electrical and electronics engineering (SIBIRCON), pp 220–222

  • Sherali HD, Smith JC (2001) Improving discrete model representations via symmetry considerations. Manag Sci 47(10):1396–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tijms HC (2003) A first course in stochastic models. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Utley M, Gallivan S, Treasure T, Valencia O (2003) Analytical methods for calculating the capacity required to operate an effective booked admissions policy for elective inpatient services. Health Care Manag Sci 6(2):97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanberkel PT, Boucherie RJ, Hans EW, Hurink JL, van Lent WAM, van Harten WH (2011) An exact approach for relating recovering surgical patient workload to the master surgical schedule. J Op Res Soc 62(10):1851–1860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams HP (1999) Model building in mathematical programming. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Dutch Technology Foundation STW, applied science division of NWO and the Technology Program of the Ministry of Economic Affairs. We would like to thank the anonymous referees and Erwin Hans for their useful comments which helped to improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Theresia van Essen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Essen, J.T., van Houdenhoven, M. & Hurink, J.L. Clustering clinical departments for wards to achieve a prespecified blocking probability. OR Spectrum 37, 243–271 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-014-0368-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-014-0368-5

Keywords

Navigation