Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response to Rogalski

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:
The Mathematical Intelligencer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z1, Canada

    Ivar Ekeland

Authors
  1. Ivar Ekeland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivar Ekeland.

Additional information

The Viewpoint column offers mathematicians the opportunity to write about any issue of interest to the international mathematical community. Disagreement and controversy are welcome. The views and opinions expressed here, however, are exclusively those of the author, and neither the publisher nor the editors-in-chief endorses or accepts responsibility for them. Viewpoint should be submitted to one of the editors-in-chief, Chandler Davis and Marjorie Senechal.

This response is to the Viewpoint ‘Mathematics and Finance: An Ethical Malaise’ by Marc Rogalski. The Mathematical Intelligencer, Summer 2010

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ekeland, I. Response to Rogalski. Math Intelligencer 32, 9–10 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-010-9156-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-010-9156-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation