Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of high-dose methotrexate prophylaxis for central nervous system relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a rare but devastating event. Intravenous high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is recommended as CNS prophylaxis, but the optimal timing and dose has not been elucidated. Here, we report a multicenter analysis of prophylactic HD-MTX administration for DLBCL. Two hundred eighty-four patients receiving HD-MTX either concurrent with each induction chemotherapy cycle (n = 221) or at the end of induction therapy (EOI, n = 63) were included. Patients with CNS-IPI scoring 4–6, and/or testicular involvement, and/or double/triple hit lymphoma, were stratified into the high-risk group and the others into the moderate-risk group. Concurrent HD-MTX was associated with increased risk of grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicity (OR,1.49; P = 0.006) and subsequent chemotherapy delays (OR, 1.87; P = 0.003) in multivariate analysis. With a median follow-up of 36.0 months, no significant difference in CNS relapse rate was identified between the concurrent and EOI groups (3.2% vs 4.8%, P = 0.34), even in the high-risk group. Analysis on systemic MTX dose suggested that high-dose MTX (≥ 2 g/m2) was associated with better CNS relapse control only in the high-risk group, but not in the moderate-risk group. This study may elucidate the superiority of EOI HD-MTX to some extent. High MTX dose (≥ 2 g/m2) may not be necessary for the moderate-risk patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Al-Hamadani M, Habermann TM, Cerhan JR, Macon WR, Maurer MJ, Go RS (2015) Non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtype distribution, geodemographic patterns, and survival in the US: a longitudinal analysis of the National Cancer Data Base from 1998 to 2011. Am J Hematol 90(9):790–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, Herbrecht R, Tilly H, Bouabdallah R et al (2002) CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 346(4):235–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pfreundschuh M, Kuhnt E, Trümper L, Osterborg A, Trneny M, Shepherd L et al (2011) CHOP-like chemotherapy with or without rituximab in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: 6-year results of an open-label randomised study of the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group. Lancet Oncol 12(11):1013–1022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Habermann TM, Weller EA, Morrison VA, Gascoyne RD, Cassileth PA, Cohn JB et al (2006) Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 24(19):3121–3127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sehn LH, Donaldson J, Chhanabhai M, Fitzgerald C, Gill K, Klasa R et al (2005) Introduction of combined CHOP plus rituximab therapy dramatically improved outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in British Columbia. J Clin Oncol 23(22):5027–5033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kridel R, Dietrich PY (2011) Prevention of CNS relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Lancet Oncol 12(13):1258–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmitz N, Zeynalova S, Nickelsen M, Kansara R, Villa D, Sehn LH et al (2016) CNS International prognostic index: a risk model for CNS relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. J Clin Oncol 34(26):3150–3156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kridel R, Telio D, Villa D, Sehn LH, Gerrie AS, Shenkier T et al (2017) Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with testicular involvement: outcome and risk of CNS relapse in the rituximab era. Br J Haematol 176(2):210–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zucca E, Conconi A, Mughal TI, Sarris AH, Seymour JF, Vitolo U et al (2003) Patterns of outcome and prognostic factors in primary large-cell lymphoma of the testis in a survey by the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21(1):20–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mazloom A, Fowler N, Medeiros LJ, Iyengar P, Horace P, Dabaja BS (2010) Outcome of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the testis by era of treatment: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Leuk Lymphoma. 51(7):1217–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fonseca R, Habermann TM, Colgan JP, O’Neill BP, White WL, Witzig TE et al (2000) Testicular lymphoma is associated with a high incidence of extranodal recurrence. Cancer 88(1):154–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cai QQ, Hu LY, Geng QR, Chen J, Lu ZH, Rao HL et al (2016) New risk factors and new tendency for central nervous system relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study. Chin J Cancer 35(1):87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Savage KJ, Slack GW, Mottok A, Sehn LH, Villa D, Kansara R et al (2016) Impact of dual expression of MYC and BCL2 by immunohistochemistry on the risk of CNS relapse in DLBCL. Blood 127(18):2182–2188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oki Y, Noorani M, Lin P, Davis RE, Neelapu SS, Ma L et al (2014) Double hit lymphoma: the MD Anderson Cancer Center clinical experience. Br J Haematol 166(6):891–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanungo A, Medeiros LJ, Abruzzo LV, Lin P (2006) Lymphoid neoplasms associated with concurrent t(14;18) and 8q24/c-MYC translocation generally have a poor prognosis. Mod Pathol 19(1):25–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Le Gouill S, Talmant P, Touzeau C, Moreau A, Garand R, Juge-Morineau N et al (2007) The clinical presentation and prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with t(14;18) and 8q24/c-MYC rearrangement. Haematologica 92(10):1335–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boehme V, Schmitz N, Zeynalova S, Loeffler M, Pfreundschuh M (2009) CNS events in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with modern chemotherapy (CHOP-14) with or without rituximab: an analysis of patients treated in the RICOVER-60 trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL). Blood 113(17):3896–3902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gleeson M, Counsell N, Cunningham D, Chadwick N, Lawrie A, Hawkes EA et al (2017) Central nervous system relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: results of the UK NCRI R-CHOP-14 versus 21 trial. Ann Oncol 28(10):2511–2516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar A, Vanderplas A, LaCasce AS, Rodriguez MA, Crosby AL, Lepisto E et al (2012) Lack of benefit of central nervous system prophylaxis for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: findings from a large national database. Cancer 118(11):2944–2951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomita N, Takasaki H, Ishiyama Y, Kishimoto K, Ishibashi D, Koyama S et al (2015) Intrathecal methotrexate prophylaxis and central nervous system relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma following rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone. Leuk Lymphoma 56(3):725–729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmitz N, Zeynalova S, Glass B, Kaiser U, Cavallin-Stahl E, Wolf M et al (2012) CNS disease in younger patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma: an analysis of patients treated on the Mabthera International Trial and trials of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group. Ann Oncol 23(5):1267–1273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferreri AJ, Bruno-Ventre M, Donadoni G, Ponzoni M, Citterio G, Foppoli M et al (2015) Risk-tailored CNS prophylaxis in a mono-institutional series of 200 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated in the rituximab era. Br J Haematol 168(5):654–662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tai WM, Chung J, Tang PL, Koo YX, Hou X, Tay KW et al (2011) Central nervous system (CNS) relapse in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL): pre- and post-rituximab. Ann Hematol 90(7):809–818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Abramson JS, Hellmann M, Barnes JA, Hammerman P, Toomey C, Takvorian T et al (2010) Intravenous methotrexate as central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis is associated with a low risk of CNS recurrence in high-risk patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer 116(18):4283–4290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Holte H, Leppä S, Björkholm M, Fluge O, Jyrkkiö S, Delabie J et al (2013) Dose-densified chemoimmunotherapy followed by systemic central nervous system prophylaxis for younger high-risk diffuse large B-cell/follicular grade 3 lymphoma patients: results of a phase II Nordic Lymphoma Group study. Ann Oncol 24(5):1385–1392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheah CY, Herbert KE, O’Rourke K, Kennedy GA, George A, Fedele PL et al (2014) A multicentre retrospective comparison of central nervous system prophylaxis strategies among patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Br J Cancer 111(6):1072–1079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Puckrin R, El Darsa H, Ghosh S, Peters A, Owen C, Stewart D (2021) Ineffectiveness of high-dose methotrexate for prevention of CNS relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Am J Hematol 96(7):764–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Orellana-Noia VM, Reed DR, Sen JM, Barlow C, Malecek MK, Kahl BS et al (2020) CNS prophylaxis during front-line therapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas: real-world outcomes and practice patterns from 19 US academic institutions. Blood 136:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Boehme V, Zeynalova S, Kloess M, Loeffler M, Kaiser U, Pfreundschuh M et al (2007) Incidence and risk factors of central nervous system recurrence in aggressive lymphoma–a survey of 1693 patients treated in protocols of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL). Ann Oncol 18(1):149–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hollender A, Kvaloy S, Nome O, Skovlund E, Lote K, Holte H (2002) Central nervous system involvement following diagnosis of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a risk model. Ann Oncol 13(7):1099–1107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferreri AJ, Reni M, Pasini F, Calderoni A, Tirelli U, Pivnik A et al (2002) A multicenter study of treatment of primary CNS lymphoma. Neurology 58(10):1513–1520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ferreri AJ, Reni M, Foppoli M, Martelli M, Pangalis GA, Frezzato M et al (2009) High-dose cytarabine plus high-dose methotrexate versus high-dose methotrexate alone in patients with primary CNS lymphoma: a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet 374(9700):1512–1520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Magrath I, Adde M, Shad A, Venzon D, Seibel N, Gootenberg J et al (1996) Adults and children with small non-cleaved-cell lymphoma have a similar excellent outcome when treated with the same chemotherapy regimen. J Clin Oncol 14(3):925–934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rizzieri DA, Johnson JL, Byrd JC, Lozanski G, Blum KA, Powell BL et al (2014) Improved efficacy using rituximab and brief duration, high intensity chemotherapy with filgrastim support for Burkitt or aggressive lymphomas: cancer and Leukemia Group B study 10 002. Br J Haematol 165(1):102–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pui CH, Campana D, Pei D, Bowman WP, Sandlund JT, Kaste SC et al (2009) Treating childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia without cranial irradiation. N Engl J Med 360(26):2730–2741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Durrleman S, Simon R (1989) Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med 8(5):551–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Govindarajulu US, Spiegelman D, Thurston SW, Ganguli B, Eisen EA (2007) Comparing smoothing techniques in Cox models for exposure-response relationships. Stat Med 26(20):3735–3752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wilson MR, Eyre TA, Martinez-Calle N, Ahearne M, Parsons KE, Preston G et al (2020) Timing of high-dose methotrexate CNS prophylaxis in DLBCL: an analysis of toxicity and impact on R-CHOP delivery. Blood Adv 4(15):3586–3593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81973384); the Special Support Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (PT19020401), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou, China (202002030205), and the Clinical Oncology Foundation of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (Y-XD2019-124).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.F. and Q.C. designed the study. Y.F. did the statistical analysis. Y.F., N.S., and S.M. wrote the manuscript. J.C., H.H., Z.L., H.H., Y.X., P.L., L.Z., W.L., L.G., Z.L., Y.W., X.T., J.W., and Y.Z. collected clinical data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingqing Cai.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the review board of each participating institution. All the procedures were performed in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki principles and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Patients submitted their written informed consents in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

The authors provided informed consent to publish.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. S1 Non-linear relationship between methotraxate dose and survival outcomes in high- and moderate-risk groups

Association of methotraxate dose with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in high- and moderate-risk group. (A) Unadjusted nonlinear relationship between methotraxate dose and survival outcomes. B, Nonlinear relationship between methotraxate dose and survival outcomes adjusted with age, gender, ECOG PS, LDH, stage and number of extranodal site. Hazard ratios (HR) are indicated by solid lines and 95% confidence intervals (CI) is by shaded areas.

Supplementary file1 (TIF 943 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 15 KB)

Supplementary file3 (DOCX 18 KB)

Supplementary file4 (DOCX 17 KB)

Supplementary file5 (DOCX 16 KB)

Supplementary file6 (DOCX 21 KB)

Supplementary file7 (DOCX 17 KB)

Supplementary file8 (DOCX 20 KB)

Supplementary file9 (DOCX 23 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fang, Y., Su, N., Ma, S. et al. Optimization of high-dose methotrexate prophylaxis for central nervous system relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter analysis. Ann Hematol 101, 595–605 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-021-04739-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-021-04739-x

Keywords

Navigation