Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of the cochlear–carotid interval on tinnitus perception

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We hypothesized that the cochlear–carotid interval (CCI), which is defined as the smallest distance along the petrous segment of the internal carotid artery and basal turn of cochlea, may be associated with direct stimulation of hair cells, thereby affecting tinnitus perception. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between the CCI, tinnitus perception, and accompanying hearing loss in patients with tinnitus.

Methods

The CCI on both sides was measured independently by two observers from the temporal 3D b-FFE MR images of 25 patients with tinnitus and 20 age/gender matched control subjects. The relationships between CCI, tinnitus visual analog scale (VAS), and tinnitus handicap inventory (THI) were investigated.

Results

CCI ranged 0.2–5.6 mm (1.9 ± 1.5) on the right and 0.1–5.4 mm (2.2 ± 1.6) on the left side in the patient group and 0.5–5.4 (1.9 ± 1.4) mm on the right and 0.3–6.7 (2.3 ± 1.7) on the left side in the control group. The differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CCI showed a strong negative correlation with THI and VAS scores on both sides. Correlation of audiologic findings with CCI revealed a significant negative correlation with pure tone average of the ipsilateral ear most affectedly at high frequencies.

Conclusion

The strong negative correlation of CCI with tinnitus-related distress and accompanying sensorineural hearing loss predominantly at high frequencies suggests that further studies on patients with tinnitus that focus on this small area may help to improve the knowledge of tinnitus pathophysiology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cetin MA, Hatipoglu HG, Ikinciogullari A, Koseoglu S, Ozcan KM, Yuksel E, Dere H (2013) The importance of carotid–cochlear interval in the etiology of hearing loss. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 65(4):345–349

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Dew L, Shelton C, Harnsberger H, Thompson BG Jr (1997) Surgical exposure of the petrous internal carotid artery: practical application for skull base surgery. Laryngoscope 107(7):967–976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goycoolea M, Muchow D, Schirber C, Goycoolea HG, Schellhas K (1990) Anatomical perspective, approach and experience with multichannel intracochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 100(2 Pt 2 Suppl 50):1–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunbey HP, Aydın H, Cetin H, Gunbey E, Karaoglanoglu M, Cay N, Alhan A (2011) MDCT assessment of the cochlear–carotid interval. Neuroradiol J 24(3):439–443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heller AJ (2003) Classification and epidemiology of tinnitus. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 36:239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leonetti J, Smith P, Linthicum F (1990) The petrous carotid artery: anatomic relationships in skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 102(1):3–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lund AD, Palacios SD (2011) Carotid artery–cochlear dehiscence: a review. Laryngoscope 121(12):2658–2660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Modugno GC, Brandolini C, Cappello I, Pirodda A (2004) Bilateral dehiscence of the bony cochlear basal turn. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(12):1427–1429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Muren C, Wadin K, Wilbrand H (1990) The cochlea and the carotid canal. Acta Radiol 31(1):33–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB (1996) Development of the tinnitus handicap inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122(2):143–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Paullus W, Pait T, Rhoton A (1977) Microsurgical exposure of the petrous portion of the carotid artery. J Neurosurg 47:713–726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Young RJ, Shatzkes DR, Babb JS, Lalwani AK (2006) The cochlear–carotid interval: anatomic variation and potential clinical implications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(7):1486–1490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hediye Pınar Gunbey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gunbey, H.P., Gunbey, E., Sayit, A.T. et al. The impact of the cochlear–carotid interval on tinnitus perception. Surg Radiol Anat 38, 551–556 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1607-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1607-4

Keywords

Navigation