Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous cholecystostomy for patients with acute cholecystitis and an increased surgical risk

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluated percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis and an increased surgical risk.

Methods

Thirty-three patients with acute cholecystitis (calculous,n=22; acalculous,n=11) underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy by means of a transhepatic (n=21) or transperitoneal (n=12) access route. Clinical and laboratory parameters were retrospectively studied to determine the benefit from cholecystostomy.

Results

All procedures were technically successful. Twenty-two (67%) patients improved clinically within 48 hr; showing a significant decreased in body temperature (n=13), normalization of the white blood cell count (n=3), or both (n=6). There were 6 (18%) minor/moderate complications (transhepatic access,n=3; transperitoneal access,n=3). Further treatment for patients with calculous cholecystitis was cholecystectomy (n=9) and percutaneous and endoscopic stone removal (n=8). Further treatment for patients with acalculous cholecystitis was cholecystectomy (n=2) and gallbladder ablation (n=2). There were 4 deaths (12%) either in hospital or within 30 days of drainage; none of the deaths was procedure-related.

Conclusion

Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a safe and effective procedure for patients with acute cholecystitis. For most patients with acalculous cholecystitis percutaneous cholecystostomy may be considered a definitive therapy. In calculous disease this treatment is often only temporizing and a definitive surgical, endoscopic, or radiologic treatment becomes necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hawkins IF (1985) Percutaneous cholectostomy. Semin Intervent Radiol 2:97–103

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eggermont AM, Laméris JS, Jeekel J (1985) Ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy for acute acalculous cholecystitis. Arch Surg 120:1354–1356

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Klimberg S, Hawkins I, Vogel SB (1987) Percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients. Am J Surg 153:125–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vogelzang RL, Nemcek AA (1988) Percutaneous cholecystostomy: Diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy. Radiology 168:29–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Teplick SK, Harshfield DL, Brandon JC, Broadwater JR, Cone JB (1991) Percutaneous cholecystostomy in critically ill patients. Gastrointest Radiol 16:154–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McGahan JP, Lindfors KK (1989) Percutaneous cholecystostomy: An alternative to surgical cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis? Radiology 173:481–485

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Akiyama H, Okazaki T, Takashima I, Satoh S, Ryan T, Iwamori S, Hidaka T, Morio K, Ohuhara T (1990) Percutaneous treatments for biliary diseases. Radiology 176:2–30

    Google Scholar 

  8. van Sonnenberg E, D'Agostino HB, Goodacre BW, Sanchez RB, Casola G (1992) Percutaneous gallbladder puncture and cholecystostomy: Results, complications, and caveats for safety. Radiology 183:167–170

    Google Scholar 

  9. Picus D, Hicks ME, Darcy MD, Vearly TM, Kleinhoffer MA, Aliperti G, Edmundowicz SA (1992) Percutaneous cholecystolithotomy: Analysis of results and complications in 58 consecutive patients. Radiology 183:779–784

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindemann SR, Tung G, Silverman SG, Mueller PR (1988) Percutaneous cholecystostomy: A review. Semin Intervent Radiol 5:179–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee MJ, Saini S, Brink JA, Hahn PF, Simeone JF, Morrison MC, Rattner D, Mueller PR (1991) Treatment of critically ill patients with sepsis of unknown cause: Value of percutaneous cholecystostomy. AJR 156:1163–1166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boland GW, Lee MJ, Leung J, Mueller PR (1994) Percutaneous cholecystostomy in critically ill patients: Early response and final outcome in 82 patients. AJR 163:339–342

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL (1978) ASA physical status classifications: A study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49:239–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Takada T, Yasuda H, Uchiyama K, Hasegawa H, Asagoe T, Shikata J (1989) Pericholecystic abscess: Classification of US findings to determine the proper therapy. Radiology 172:693–697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McGahan JP, Lindfors KK (1988) Acute cholecystitis: Diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous aspiration of the gallbladder. Radiology 167:669–671

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Warren LP, Kadir S, Dunnick NR (1988) Percutaneous cholecystostomy: Anatomic considerations. Radiology 168:615–616

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Welch JP, Malt RA (1972) Outcome of cholecystostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 135:717–720

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boland GW, Lee MJ, Mueller PR, Dawson SL, Gaa J, Lu DS, Gazelle GS (1994) Gallstones in critically ill patients with acute calculous cholecystitis treated by percutaneous cholecystostomy: Nonsurgical therapeutic options. AJR 162:1101–1103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Overhagen, H., Meyers, H., Tilanus, H.W. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for patients with acute cholecystitis and an increased surgical risk. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 19, 72–76 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02563896

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02563896

Key words

Navigation