Skip to main content
Log in

Recanalization of Acute and Subacute Venous and Synthetic Bypass-Graft Occlusions With a Mechanical Rotational Catheter

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) is now established as an alternative treatment of acute arterial occlusions in addition to fibrinolysis and surgical thrombectomy. The objective of this retrospective study was the investigation of a rotational atherothrombectomy catheter in terms of safety and efficacy in the treatment of acute and subacute femoropopliteal bypass occlusions.

Materials and Methods

Forty-two patients (average age 65.8 ± 9.1 years) with acute (<14 days [n = 31]) and subacute (14–42 days [n = 11]) femoropopliteal bypass occlusions were treated consecutively with a rotational debulking and removal catheter (Straub Rotarex). The average occlusion length was 28.4 ± 2.9 (24–34) cm. Thirty-four (81 %) patients underwent venous bypass, and 8 (19 %) patients underwent polytetrafluoroethylene bypass.

Results

The technical success rate was 97.6 % (41 of 42). In 1 patient, blood flow could not be restored despite the use of the atherothrombectomy system. The average catheter intervention time was 6.9 ± 2.1 (4–9) min. Ankle-brachial index increased from 0.39 ± 0.13 to 0.83 ± 0.11 at discharge and to 0.82 ± 0.17 after 1 month (p < 0.05). There were a total of 2 (4.8 %) peri-interventional complications: One patient developed a distal embolism, which was successfully treated with local lysis, and another patient had a small perforation at the distal anastomosis, which was successfully treated with a stent.

Conclusion

PMT with the Rotarex atherothrombectomy catheter represents a safe and effective option in the treatment of acute and subacute femoropopliteal bypass occlusions because it can quickly restore blood flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lavanier GL, Sacks D, Robinson ML (1992) Acute limb ischemia. Emerg Med Clin North Am 10:103–119

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aburhama AF, Hopkins ES, Wulu JT et al (2002) Lysis/balloon angioplasty versus thrombectomy/open patch angioplasty of failed femoropopliteal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafts. J Vasc Surg 35:307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Damme H, Trotteur G, Dongelinger RF et al (1997) Thrombolysis of occluded infrainguinal bypass grafts. Acta Chir Belg 97:177–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Comerota AJ, Weaver FA, Hosking JD et al (1996) Results of a prospective, randomized trial of surgery versus thrombolysis for occluded lower extremity bypass grafts. Am J Surg 172:105–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA et al (2007) Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33:S1–S75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharafuddin MJA, Hicks ME (1997) Current status of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy. Part 1. General principles. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8:911–921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dregelid EB, Stangeland LB, Eide GE et al (1987) Patient survival and limb prognosis after arterial embolectomy. Eur J Vasc Surg 1:263–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ouriel K, Veith FJ, Sasahara AA (1998) A comparison of recombinant urokinase with vascular surgery as initial treatment for acute arterial occlusion of the legs. Thrombolysis or Peripheral Arterial Surgery (TOPAS) Investigators. N Engl J Med 338:1105–1111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. The STILE Investigators (1994) Results of a prospective randomized trial evaluating surgery versus thrombolysis for ischemia of the lower extremity. Ann Surg 220:251–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bildsoe MC, Moradian GP, Hunter DW et al (1989) Mechanical clot dissolution: new concept. Radiology 171:231–233

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Blaisdell FW, Stelle M, Allen RE (1978) Management of acute lower extremity ischemia due to embolism and thrombosis. Surgery 84:822–834

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weaver FA, Comerota AJ, Youngblood M et al (1996) Surgical revascularization versus thrombolysis for nonembolic lower extremity native artery occlusions: results of a prospective randomized trial. The STILE Investigators. Surgery versus Thrombolysis for Ischemia of the Lower Extremity. J Vasc Surg 24:513–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Palfreyman SJ, Michaels JA (1999) Vascular surgical society of Great Britain and Ireland: systematic review of intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy for peripheral vascular occlusions. Br J Surg 85(5):704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ritchie JL, Hansen DD, Vracko R, Auth DC et al (1986) Mechanical thrombolysis: a new rotational catheter approach for acute thrombi. Circulation 73:1006–1012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Drasler WJ, Jenson ML, Wilson GJ et al (1992) Rheolytic catheter for percutaneous removal of thrombus. Radiology 182:263–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reekers JA, Kromhout JG, van der Waal K (1993) Catheter for percutaneous thrombectomy: first clinical experience. Radiology 188:8871–8874

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schmitz-Rode T, Gunther RW, Muller-Leise C (1991) US-assisted aspiration thromboembolectomy: in vitro investigations. Radiology 178:677–679

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharafuddin MJA, Hicks ME (1998) Current status of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy. Part 2. Devices and mechanism of action. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9:15–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharafuddin MJA, Hicks ME (1998) Current status of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy. Part 3. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9:209–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C et al (1997) Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia. Revisited version. J Vasc Surg 26:517–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zeller T, Frank U, Bürgelin K et al (2002) Langzeitergebnisse nach Rekanalisation akuter und subakuter thrombotischer arterieller Verschlüsse der unteren Extremitäten mit einem Rotations-Thrombektomiekatheter. Fortschr Röntgenstr 174:1559–1565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmitt HE, Jäger KA, Jacob AL et al (1999) A new rotational thrombectomy catheter: system design and first clinical experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 22:504–509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jaeger KA, Schmitt EM, Schmitt HE (1999) Peripheral thrombectomy with the new Straub-Rotarex® Catheter: A Multicenter Study. Int Angiol (Suppl) 1:17A

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wissgott C, Kamusella P, Richter A et al (2008) Mechanical rotational thrombectomy for treatment thrombolysis in acute and subacute occlusion of femoropopliteal arteries: retrospective analysis of the results from 1999 to 2005. Fortschr Röntgenstr 180:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wissgott C, Kamusella P, Andresen R (2011) Treatment of chronic occlusions of the iliac or femoropopliteal arteries with mechanical rotational catheters. Fortschr Röntgenstr 183:945–951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wissgott C, Kamusella P, Andresen R (2011) Treatment of in-stent reocclusions of femoropopliteal arteries with mechanical rotational catheters. Fortschr Röntgenstr 183:939–944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Duc SR, Schoch E, Pfyffer M et al (2005) Recanalization of acute and subacute femoropopliteal artery occlusions with the Rotarex catheter: one year follow-up, single center experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28(5):603–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Silingardi R, Cataldi V, Moratto R et al (2010) Mechanical thrombectomy in in-stent restenosis: preliminary experience at the iliac and femoropopliteal arteries with Rotarex system. J Cardiovasc Surg 51:543–550

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wissgott C, Richter A, Kamusella P et al (2007) Treatment of critical limb ischemia using ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis (PARES Trial): final results. J Endovasc Ther 14:438–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nolte-Ernsting C, Abel K, Krupski G et al (2006) Wirtschaftliche Evaluation angiographischer Interventionen einschließlich einer radiologischen stationären und ambulanten Patientenbetreuung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 178:78–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Deák Z, Strube H, Sadeghi-Azandaryani M, Reiser MF et al (2011) Rotational thrombectomy of acute peripheral vascular occlusions using the ThromCat XT device: technique, indications and initial results. Diagn Interv Radiol 17:283–289

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kasirajan K, Gray B, Beavers FP et al (2001) Rheoltic thrombectomy in the management of acute and subacute limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:413–421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Allie DE, Hebert CJ, Keller VA et al (2004) Novel simultaneous combination chemical thrombolysis/rheolytic thrombectomy therapy for acute critical limb ischemia: the power-pulse spray technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 63:512–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wissgott C, Kamusella P, Andresen R (2011) Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy: advantages and limitations. J Cardiovasc Surg 52:477–484

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Wissgott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wissgott, C., Kamusella, P. & Andresen, R. Recanalization of Acute and Subacute Venous and Synthetic Bypass-Graft Occlusions With a Mechanical Rotational Catheter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36, 936–942 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0507-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0507-9

Keywords

Navigation