Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Three-Dimensional Volumetric Analysis of the Effect of Interval Time in Autologous Fat Graft Breast Augmentation

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Autologous adipose tissue has become increasingly popular in cosmetic and plastic reconstructive surgery, especially breast augmentation surgery. However, the volume retention rate after transplantation significantly varies and may be unsatisfactory. Many patients need two or more autologous fat graft breast augmentations to achieve the expected effect. There are currently no studies on optimal timing between fat injections.

Methods

We identified target patients with secondary or multiple autologous fat transplantations by inclusion and exclusion criteria and used three-dimensional scanning technology to calculate the volume retention. Patients were divided into two groups according to the dates of the first and second operations (group A: interoperative time < 120 days, group B: interoperative time ≥ 120 days). We used SPSS 26 for statistical calculations.

Results

We included 161 patients in this retrospective study, with an average volume retention rate of 36.56% in group A (n = 85) and 27.45% in group B (n = 76). The independent sample t test showed that the volume retention rate in group A was higher than that in group B (P < 0.001). And the paired t test showed there is a significant improvement of volume retention rate after the second fat graft session (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the interval time was an independent factor affecting the postoperative volume retention rate.

Conclusion

The interval time between autologous fat transplantation for augmentation mammaplasty was an independent factor affecting the postoperative volume retention rate. The postoperative volume retention rate of the < 120 days group was higher than that of the ≥ 120 days group.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heidekrueger PI, Sinno S, Hidalgo DA, Colombo M, Broer PN (2018) Current trends in breast augmentation: an international analysis. Aesthet Surg J 38(2):133–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Strong AL, Cederna PS, Rubin JP, Coleman SR, Levi B (2015) The current state of fat grafting: a review of harvesting, processing, and injection techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(4):897–912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kreulen M, van de Kar A (2008) Long-term follow-up in the treatment of keloids by combined surgical excision and immediate postoperative adjuvant irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(2):700–701

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gutowski KA, Force AFGT (2009) Current applications and safety of autologous fat grafts: a report of the ASPS fat graft task force. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):272–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Del Vecchio D, Rohrich RJ (2012) A classification of clinical fat grafting: different problems, different solutions. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(3):511–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gentile P, Scioli MG, Orlandi A, Cervelli V (2015) Breast reconstruction with enhanced stromal vascular fraction fat grafting: what is the best method? Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3(6):e406

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Arshad Z, Karmen L, Choudhary R et al (2016) Cell assisted lipotransfer in breast augmentation and reconstruction: a systematic review of safety, efficacy, use of patient reported outcomes and study quality. JPRAS Open 24(10):5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Toyserkani NM, Quaade ML, Sorensen JA (2016) Cell-assisted lipotransfer: a systematic review of its efficacy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 40(2):309–318

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Losken A, Pinell XA, Sikoro K et al (2011) Autologous fat grafting in secondary breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 66(5):518–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Delay E (2005) Lipomodeling of the reconstructed breast. In: Spear SL, Wiley SC, Rob GI et al (eds) Surgery of the breast: principles and art. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 930–946

    Google Scholar 

  11. Missana MC, Laurent I, Barreau L, Balleyguier C (2007) Autologous fat transfer in reconstructive breast surgery: indications, technique and results. Eur J Surg Oncol 33(6):685–690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cervelli D, Gasparini G, Grussu F et al (2014) Autologous fat transplantation for the temporalis muscle flap donor site: our experience with 45 cases. Head Neck 36(9):1296–1304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang T, Xie Y, Zhu M et al (2016) The second fat graft has significantly better outcome than the first fat graft for Romberg syndrome: a study of three-dimensional volumetric analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(12):1621–1626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lv Q, Li X, Qi Y et al (2021) Volume retention after facial fat grafting and relevant factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 45(2):506–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu C, Luan J, Ji K, Sun J (2012) Measuring volumetric change after augmentation mammaplasty using a three-dimensional scanning technique: an innovative method. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(5):1134–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Runfola CD, Von Holle A, Trace SE et al (2013) Body dissatisfaction in women across the lifespan: results of the UNC-SELF and Gender and Body Image (GABI) studies. Eur Eat Disord Rev 21(1):52–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nuttall FQ (2015) Body mass index: obesity, BMI, and health: a critical review. Nutr Today 50(3):117–128

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Maher JL, Bennett DC, Bennett LL, Grothaus P, Mahabir RC (2010) Breast augmentation: a geographical comparison. Can J Plast Surg 18(4):e44-46

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gupta V, Yeslev M, Winocour J et al (2017) Aesthetic breast surgery and concomitant procedures: incidence and risk factors for major complications in 73,608 cases. Aesthet Surg J 37(5):515–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shi H, Cao C, Li X, Chen L, Li S (2015) A retrospective study of primary breast augmentation: recovery period, complications and patient satisfaction. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(10):18737–18743

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lutfi D, Turkof E (2020) Adipose-derived stem cell enrichment is counter-productive for the majority of women seeking primary aesthetic breast augmentation by autologous fat transfer: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 73(11):2025–2032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoshimura K, Eto H, Kato H, Doi K, Aoi N (2011) In vivomanipulation of stem cells for adipose tissue repair/reconstruction. Regen Med 6(6):33–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jung HK, Kim CH, Song SY (2016) Prospective 1-year follow-up study of breast augmentation by cell-assisted lipotransfer. Aesthet Surg J 36(2):179–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ho Quoc C, Delaporte T, Meruta A et al (2013) Breast asymmetry and pectus excavatum improvement with fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J 33(6):822–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ho Quoc C, Taupin T, Guérin N, Delay E (2015) Volumetric evaluation of fat resorption after breast lipofilling. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 60(6):495–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kølle SF, Fischer-Nielsen A, Mathiasen AB et al (2013) Enrichment of autologous fat grafts with ex-vivo expanded adipose tissue-derived stem cells for graft survival: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 382(9898):1113–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sarfati I, van la Parra RFD, Terem-Rapoport CA et al (2017) A prospective randomized study comparing centrifugation and sedimentation for fat grafting in breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70(9):1218–1228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao J, Yi C, Li L et al (2012) Observations on the survival and neovascularization of fat grafts interchanged between C57BL/6-gfp and C57BL/6 mice. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(3):398e–406e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Maricevich J, Lima M, Maricevich AC et al (2020) Histological evaluation of the skin after fat grafting: a blinded, randomized controlled clinical study. Aesthet Surg J 40(6):NP388–NP393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kato H, Mineda K, Eto H et al (2014) Degeneration, regeneration, and cicatrization after fat grafting: dynamic total tissue remodeling during the first 3 months. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(3):303e–313e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Khouri RK, Khouri RK, Rigotti G et al (2014) Aesthetic applications of Brava-assisted megavolume fat grafting to the breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(4):796–807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoshimura K, Asano Y, Aoi N et al (2010) Progenitor-enriched adipose tissue transplantation as rescue for breast implant complications. Breast J 16(2):169–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Choi M, Small K, Levovitz C et al (2013) The volumetric analysis of fat graft survival in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(2):185–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu R, Yang X, Jin X et al (2018) Three-dimensional volumetric analysis of 3 fat-processing techniques for facial fat grafting: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 20(3):222–229

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Klinger M, Marazzi M, Vigo D, Torre M (2008) Fat injection for cases of severe burn outcomes: a new perspective of scar remodeling and reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32(3):465–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nakagami H, Maeda K, Morishita R et al (2005) Novel autologous cell therapy in ischemic limb disease through growth factor secretion by cultured adipose tissue-derived stromal cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25(12):2542–2547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ozalp B, Cakmakoglu C (2017) The effect of smoking on facial fat grafting surgery. J Craniofac Surg 28(2):449–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA Jr, Carlson GW (2005) Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54(5):471–476 (discussion 477-8)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lubbers HT, Medinger L, Kruse A, Gratz KW, Matthews F (2010) Precision and accuracy of the 3dMD photogrammetric system in craniomaxillofacial application. J Craniofac Surg 21(3):763–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Agrawal KS, Bachhav M, Naik CS, Tanwar H, Sankhe SS (2016) Autologous fat transfer for esthetic contouring of face in posttraumatic nonfunctional maxillofacial deformities. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 9(2):113–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

The work described in this paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.8217082035).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dali Mu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Patients provided written consent for the use of their images.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, Y., Mu, D., Zhang, X. et al. Three-Dimensional Volumetric Analysis of the Effect of Interval Time in Autologous Fat Graft Breast Augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg 47, 1731–1739 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03367-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03367-2

Keywords

Navigation