Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Treatment of Capsular Contracture Around Breast Implants Induced by Fractionated Irradiation: The Collagenase of the Bacterium Clostridium Histolyticum as a Novel Therapeutic Approach

  • Original Article
  • Basic Science/Experimental
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Irradiation therapy limits the utilization of silicone implants for breast reconstruction due to a significant risk for capsular contracture. The injection of the collagenase of the bacterium Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) might trivialize this risk by providing a minimal-invasive treatment option by capsular contracture degradation. However, efficacy in degrading breast implant capsules induced by fractionated irradiation remains unclear.

Methods

Twenty-four rats in three groups received miniature silicone implants in a submuscular pocket. After 3D dose calculation and treatment field definition, rats of two groups underwent fractionated radiotherapy (6 × 8 Gy) using a linear accelerator. A third group served as control. On day 120, one irradiated group received injections of 0.3 mg/ml collagenase. Administration of plain solvent solution served as control in the two other groups. Outcome parameters included CT-imaging, histology, vessel wall analysis, immunohistochemistry, chemical collagen quantification and gene expression analysis.

Results

Fractioned irradiation leads to a significant increase in collagen deposition around silicone implants with higher capsule thickness and collagen density when comparing all groups. Additionally, significant alterations of collagen fiber deposition were evident. Vessel wall thickness was significantly increased after radiotherapy. The injection of collagenase led to a significant reduction of capsule thickness, collagen density and content. However, the collagenase application induced a significant overexpression of TGFβ1. No side effects were monitored.

Conclusions

The CCH proved to be a safe and effective approach to degrade capsule tissue induced by fractionated irradiation in an animal model. This may pave its way for clinical application in implant-based breast reconstruction patients.

Level of Evidence

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References:

  1. Matuschek C, Nestle-Kraemling C, Kühn T, Fehm T, Böke E, Corradini S, Fastner G, Maas K, Seidel C, Budach W (2020) Neoadjuvant radio (chemo) therapy for breast cancer: an old concept revisited. Breast Care 15(2):109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Krug D (2020) Adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer: more than meets the eye. Breast Care 15(2):109–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pomahac B, Recht A, May JW, Hergrueter CA, Slavin SA (2006) New trends in breast cancer management: is the era of immediate breast reconstruction changing? Ann Surg 244(2):282–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, McCormick B, Hu Q, Van Zee K (2014) The impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy on two-stage implant breast reconstruction: an analysis of long-term surgical outcomes, aesthetic results, and satisfaction over 13 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(4):588–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Panchal H, Matros E (2017) Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstruct Surg 140(5S):7s–13s

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wick G, Backovic A, Rabensteiner E, Plank N, Schwentner C, Sgonc R (2010) The immunology of fibrosis: innate and adaptive responses. Trends Immunol 31(3):110–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT (2008) Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol 20(2):86–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gurunluoglu R, Sacak B, Arton J (2013) Outcomes analysis of patients undergoing autoaugmentation after breast implant removal. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(2):304–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Young VL (1998) Guidelines and indications for breast implant capsulectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(3):884–891 (discussion 892–884)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer S, Hirsch T, Diehm Y, Kiefer J, Bueno EM, Kueckelhaus M, Kremer T, Hirche C, Kneser U, Pomahac B (2015) The Collagenase of the bacterium clostridium histolyticum for the treatment of capsular fibrosis after silicone implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(5):981–989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Diehm YF, Hirche C, Berger MR, Heil J, Golatta M, Kotsougiani D, Pomahac B, Kneser U, Fischer S (2019) The Collagenase of the bacterium clostridium histolyticum in the treatment of irradiation-induced capsular contracture. Aesthet Plast Surg 43(3):836–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fischer S, Hirche C, Diehm Y, Nuutila K, Kiefer J, Gazyakan E, Bueno EM, Kremer T, Kneser U, Pomahac B (2016) Efficacy and safety of the collagenase of the bacterium clostridium histolyticum for the treatment of capsular contracture after silicone implants: ex-vivo study on human tissue. PLoS ONE 11(5):e0156428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fischer S, Diehm Y, Henzler T, Berger MR, Kolbenschlag J, Latz A, Bueno EM, Hirche C, Kneser U, Pomahac B (2016) Long-term effects of the collagenase of the bacterium clostridium histolyticum for the treatment of capsular fibrosis after silicone implants. Aesthet Plast Surg 1(41):211–220

    Google Scholar 

  14. Powers BE, Thames HD, Gillette EL (1999) Long-term adverse effects of radiation inhibition of restenosis: radiation injury to the aorta and branch arteries in a canine model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45(3):753–759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim BJ, Kang HG, Lee S-w, Jung J, Lee M-H, Kang D-W, Kim JS, Kwon SU (2018) Changes in the common carotid artery after radiotherapy: wall thickness, calcification, and atherosclerosis. J Clini Neurol 14(1):35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fischer S, Mueller W, Schulte M, Kiefer J, Hirche C, Heimer S, Kollensperger E, Germann G, Reichenberger MA (2015) Multiple extracorporeal shock wave therapy degrades capsular fibrosis after insertion of silicone implants. Ultrasound Med Biol 41(3):781–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fischer S, Hirche C, Reichenberger MA, Kiefer J, Diehm Y, Mukundan S, Alhefzi M, Bueno EM, Kneser U, Pomahac B (2015) Silicone implants with smooth surfaces induce thinner but denser fibrotic capsules compared to those with textured surfaces in a rodent model. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0132131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Overgaard M, Nielsen HM, Overgaard J (2007) Is the benefit of postmastectomy irradiation limited to patients with four or more positive nodes, as recommended in international consensus reports? A subgroup analysis of the DBCG 82 b&c randomized trials. Radiother Oncol: J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 82(3):247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ragaz J, Olivotto IA, Spinelli JJ, Phillips N, Jackson SM, Wilson KS, Knowling MA, Coppin CM, Weir L, Gelmon K, Le N, Durand R, Coldman AJ, Manji M (2005) Locoregional radiation therapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: 20-year results of the British Columbia randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(2):116–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mericli AF, Sharabi SE (2019) Breast implants and radiation. Semin Plast Surg 33(4):240–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thorarinsson A, Frojd V, Kolby L, Ljungdal J, Taft C, Mark H (2017) Long-term health-related quality of life after breast reconstruction: comparing 4 different methods of reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5(6):e1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ho AY, Hu ZI, Mehrara BJ, Wilkins EG (2017) Radiotherapy in the setting of breast reconstruction: types, techniques, and timing. Lancet Oncol 18(12):e742–e753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Ghazal SK, Sully L, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW (2000) The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction. Eur J surg oncol : J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol 26(1):17–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilflingseder P, Hoinkes G, Mikuz G (1983) Tissue reactions from silicone implant in augmentation mammaplasties. Minerva Chir 38(12):877–880

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA (2006) A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstruct Surg 117(3):757–767 (discussion 768–772)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Marques M, Brown SA, Oliveira I, Cordeiro MNDS, Morales-Helguera A, Rodrigues A, Amarante J (2010) Long-term follow-up of breast capsule contracture rates in cosmetic and reconstructive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(3):769–778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rohrich RJ, Kenkel JM, Adams WP (1999) Preventing capsular contracture in breast augmentation: in search of the Holy Grail. Plast Reconstr Surg 103(6):1759–1760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Katzel EB, Koltz PF, Tierney R, Williams JP, Awad HA, O'Keefe RJ, Langstein HN (2010) A novel animal model for studying silicone gel-related capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(5):1483–1491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Prantl L, Englbrecht MA, Schoeneich M, Kuehlmann B, Jung EM, Kubale R (2014) Semiquantitative measurements of capsular contracture with elastography—first results in correlation to Baker Score. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 58(4):521–528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sowa Y, Yokota I, Itsukage S, Nakatsukasa K, Sakaguchi K, Taguchi T, Numajiri T (2017) Evaluation of the severity of capsular contracture using elastography after breast implant reconstruction. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 66(1):1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Martin JD, Buckley AR, Graeb D, Walman B, Salvian A, Hay JH (2005) Carotid artery stenosis in asymptomatic patients who have received unilateral head-and-neck irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(4):1197–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. So NM, Lam WW, Chook P, Woo KS, Liu KH, Leung SF, Wong KS, Metreweli C (2002) Carotid intima-media thickness in patients with head and neck irradiation for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Radiol 57(7):600–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Steele SR, Martin MJ, Mullenix PS, Crawford JV, Cuadrado DS, Andersen CA (2004) Focused high-risk population screening for carotid arterial stenosis after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Am J Surg 187(5):594–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Prantl L, Schreml S, Fichtner-Feigl S, Poppl N, Eisenmann-Klein M, Schwarze H, Fuchtmeier B (2007) Clinical and morphological conditions in capsular contracture formed around silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(1):275–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Clugston PA, Perry LC, Hammond DC, Maxwell GP (1994) A rat model for capsular contracture: the effects of surface texturing. Ann Plast Surg 33(6):595–599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to acknowledge funding support through an Educational Research Grant from Endo Pharmaceuticals. We would like to thank Polytech (Dieburg, Germany) for providing the miniature silicone implants. Funders did not influence study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Fischer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All applicable institutional and national guidelines for care and use of animals were followed (AEP No.: 05086).

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Figure 1: Example picture of minimal-invasive CCH-Injection.

The CCH is injected between implant and capsule in the upper parts of the capsule with a blunt needle. Distribution into the lower capsule parts takes place due to gravity. (PNG 1423 kb)

Supplementary Figure 2: Example Pictures of outcome analysis.

Representative slides of CT-scans (first row), Hematoxylin & Eosin (thickness measurements, second row), Picrosirus Red (density measurements, third row) and Vessels (fourth row) of all study groups. (PNG 3468 kb)

Supplementary Figure 3: Example Pictures of Immunohistochemistry.

Representative slides at 20× magnification of all study groups for collagen I–IV subtype and TGFβ1 analysis. (JPG 245 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diehm, Y.F., Jost, Y., Kotsougiani-Fischer, D. et al. The Treatment of Capsular Contracture Around Breast Implants Induced by Fractionated Irradiation: The Collagenase of the Bacterium Clostridium Histolyticum as a Novel Therapeutic Approach. Aesth Plast Surg 45, 1273–1281 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01970-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01970-1

Keywords

Navigation