Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sexuality Among Women Treated for Breast Cancer: A Survey of Three Surgical Procedures

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The quality of life of Mexican patients with breast cancer has been studied, but female sexual function has only been explored superficially. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire has been validated as a tool to measure sexual function among women with cancer. However, no study in Mexico has been published.

Purpose

To evaluate and compare female sexuality of breast cancer survivors treated with three surgical procedures.

Materials and Methods

This is a cross-sectional questionnaire survey applied in patients without active disease and free of any oncologic treatment who underwent conservative mastectomy, and mastectomy with and without reconstruction. Patients included in this study had no evidence of active disease after at least 2 years of postoperative follow-up and agreed to complete the FSFI questionnaire during a surveillance visit.

Results

Seventy-four patients were included: 37.8% had undergone conservative mastectomy, 29.7% radical mastectomy, and 32.4% radical mastectomy plus reconstruction. Patients in the radical mastectomy group were older than those in the other groups (p = 0.002). Female sexual dysfunction was observed in 34% of patients, but in patients who underwent radical mastectomy, it was 63% by contrast with 14 and 29% in women treated with conservative mastectomy and radical mastectomy with reconstruction (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

We found a lower prevalence of female sexual dysfunction in patients treated with conservative mastectomy or reconstruction after radical mastectomy. Alternatively, radical mastectomy was offered to older patients, a condition that could contribute together with a loss of female perception to a higher prevalence of sexual dysfunction.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization (2013) GLOBOCAN 2012: estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. World Health Organization. http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed 12 June 2017

  2. Rodríguez-Cuevas S, Guisa-Hohenstein F, Labastida-Almendaro S (2009) First breast cancer mammography screening program in Mexico: initial results 2005–2006. Breast J 15:623–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gómez-Dantes O, Sesma S, Becerril VM, Knaul FM, Arreola H, Frenk J (2011) The health system of Mexico. Salud Publica Mex 53:s220–s232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arce-Salinas C, Lara-Medina FU, Alvarado-Miranda A, Castañeda-Soto N, Bargallo-Rocha E, Ramírez-Ugalde MT, Pérez-Sánchez V, Rivera L, Gambo-Vignole C, Santamaría-Galicia J, Nieves-Casas RI, Morán-Muñoz H, Mohar-Betancourt A (2012) Evaluation of breast cancer treatment at a tertiary-level institution with popular health insurance in Mexico. Rev Invest Clin 64:9–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cortés-Flores AO, Morgan-Villela G, Zuloaga-Fernández del Valle CJ, Jiménez-Tornero J, Juárez-Uzeta E, Urias-Valdez DP, García-González LA, Fuentes-Orozco C, Chávez-Tostado M, Macías-Amezcua MD, Garcia-Renteria J, González-Ojeda A (2014) Quality of life among women treated for breast cancer: a survey of three procedures in Mexico. Aesthetic Plast Surg 38:887–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anastasiadis AG, Davis AR, Ghafar MA, Burchardt M, Shabsigh R (2002) The epidemiology and definition of female sexual disorders. World J Urol 20:74–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Basson R (2006) Clinical practice: sexual desire and arousal disorders in women. N Engl J Med 354:1497–1506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D’Agostino R Jr (2000) The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26:191–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baser R, Li Y, Carter J (2012) Psychometric validation of the female sexual function index (FSFI) in cancer survivors. Cancer 118:4606–4618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sat-Muñoz D, Contreras-Hernández I, Balderas-Peña LM, Hernández-Chávez GA, Solano-Murillo P, Mariscal-Ramírez I, Lomelí-García M, Díaz-Cortés MA, Mould-Quevedo JF, López-Mariscal AR, Prieto-Miranda SE, Morgan-Villela G (2011) Quality of life in Mexican women with breast cancer at different stages and its association with sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities and procedural factors at the Mexican Institute of Social Security. Value Health 14(5 Suppl 1):S133–S136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cerezo O, Oñate-Ocaña LF, Arrieta-Joffe P, González-Lara F, García-Pasquel MJ, Bargallo-Rocha E, Vilar-Compte D (2012) Validation of the Mexican-Spanish version of the EORTC QLQC30 and BR23 questionnaires to assess health-related quality of life in Mexican women with breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 21:684–691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maiorino MI, Chiodini P, Bellastella G, Giugliano D, Esposito K (2016) Sexual dysfunction in women with cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies using the female sexual function index. Endocrine 54:329–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Neto MS, de Aguiar Menezes MV, Moreira JR, García EB, Abla LE, Ferreira LM (2013) Sexuality after breast reconstruction post mastectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 37:643–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rojas K, Onstad M, Raker C, Clark MA, Stuckey A, Gass J (2017) The impact of mastectomy type on the female sexual function index (FSFI), satisfaction with appearance, and the reconstructed breast’s role in intimacy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 163:273–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, Aguilar M, Marubini E (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1227–1232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kummerow KL, Du L, Penson DF, Shyr Y, Hooks MA (2015) Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg 150:9–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Linares-Pérez N, López-Arellano O (2012) Inequalities in health in Mexico. Gac Med Mex 148:591–597

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro González-Ojeda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cortés-Flores, A.O., Vargas-Meza, A., Morgan-Villela, G. et al. Sexuality Among Women Treated for Breast Cancer: A Survey of Three Surgical Procedures. Aesth Plast Surg 41, 1275–1279 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0960-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0960-6

Keywords

Navigation