Skip to main content
Log in

Osteoplasty in Crooked Nose Deformity: A Novel Approach

  • Innovative Techniques
  • Rhinoplasty
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Crooked nose deformity is one of the most difficult issues to correct by rhinoplasty, as it can result in undesired late sequelae. Revision rates are often high, and numerous operational techniques have been tested. This study describes a crooked nose rhinoplasty technique that reduces the need for a double osteotomy in the long nasal bone.

Methods

This study included 26 patients with an I-shaped crooked nose deformity. In the surgical correction of the crooked nose deformity, previously defined techniques were applied to the cartilage identically. However, the traditional double osteotomy of the long nasal bone was not performed. Instead, the bone protruding laterally from the long nasal bone was narrowed by rasping with a file or burr, and this section was delivered to the maxilla accordingly. Angle values were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Two lines were used to measure the angle: The first was drawn from the midpoint of the glabella to the midpoint of the upper lip, while the second, representing the nasal dorsal axis, consisted of both the osseous and cartilaginous parts from the nasion to the anterior nasal spine. The angle between these two lines was taken as the angle of deviation from the median line.

Results

Postoperatively, patients’ angle values were significantly smaller than preoperatively. After 1 year, no persistence was observed.

Conclusion

In crooked nose deformity surgery, the osteoplasty technique applied to the lateral protrusion of the long nasal bone described here was as successful as a double osteotomy. Thus, certain complications of a double osteotomy can be avoided. In addition, as no greenstick fractures were induced, the long-term persistence risk was also reduced.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stepnick D, Guyuron B (2010) Surgical treatment of the crooked nose. Clin Plast Surg 37:313–325. doi:10.1016/j.cps.2009.12.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guyuron B (1998) Nasal osteotomy and airway changes. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:856–860 (discussion 861–3)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wayne I (2013) Osteotomies in rhinoplasty surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 21:379–383. doi:10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283631e85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Okur E, Yildirim I, Aydogan B, Kilic MA (2004) Outcome of surgery for crooked nose: an objective method of evaluation. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:203–207. doi:10.1007/s00266-004-0001-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vuyk HD (2000) A review of practical guidelines for correction of the deviated, asymmetric nose. Rhinology 38:72–78

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rohrich RJ, Gunter JP, Deuber MA, Adams WP (2002) The deviated nose: optimizing results using a simplified classification and algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1509–1523. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000072285.47341.C4 (discussion 1524–1525)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Toriumi DM (2013) Subtotal septal reconstruction: an update. Fac Plast Surg 29:492–501. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1360600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boccieri A, Pascali M (2003) Septal crossbar graft for the correction of the crooked nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:629–638. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000042205.27330.E4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Akbaş H, Keskin M, Güneren E et al (2002) Unilateral osteotomies for externally deviated noses. Aesthet Plast Surg 26:413–415. doi:10.1007/s00266-002-2050-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rettinger G (2007) Risks and complications in rhinoplasty. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 8:Doc08. doi:10.1055/s-2007-966304

    Google Scholar 

  11. McKinney P, Shively R (1979) Straightening the twisted nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 64:176–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vuyk HD, Adamson PA (1998) Biomaterials in rhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 23:209–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erol Senturk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koçak, I., Senturk, E. Osteoplasty in Crooked Nose Deformity: A Novel Approach. Aesth Plast Surg 41, 628–636 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0848-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0848-5

Keywords

Navigation