Skip to main content
Log in

Consequences of paternal care on pectoral fin allometry in a desert-dwelling fish

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Positive static allometry is a scaling relationship where the relative size of traits covaries with adult body size. Traditionally, positive allometry is thought to result from either altered physiological requirements at larger body size or from strongly condition-dependent allocation under sexual selection. Yet, there are no theoretical reasons why positive allometry cannot evolve in fitness-related traits that are solely under the influence of natural selection. We investigated scaling and sexual dimorphism of a naturally selected trait, pectoral fin size, in comparison to a trait important in male–male combat, head width in natural populations of a fish, the desert goby Chlamydogobius eremius. Male desert gobies provide uniparental care and use their pectoral fins to fan the brood (often under hypoxic conditions); hence, larger fins are expected to be more efficient. Male pectoral fins do not appear to fulfil a signalling function in this species. We found that, for both pectoral fin size and head width, males exhibited positive allometric slopes and greater relative trait size (allometric elevation) than females. However, for head width, females also showed positive allometry, albeit to a lesser degree than males. Because fin locomotory function typically does not result in positive allometry, our findings indicate that other naturally selected uses, such as paternal care, can exaggerate trait scaling relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M (1986) Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40:804–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker TCM, Mundwiler B (1999) Pectoral fin size in a fish species with paternal care: a condition-dependent sexual trait revealing infection status. Freshw Biol 41:543–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldauf S, Bakker T, Herder F, Kullmann H, Thünken T (2010) Male mate choice scales female ornament allometry in a cichlid fish. BMC Evol Biol 10:301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blake RW (1979) The mechanics of labriform locomotion I. Labriform locomotion in the angelfish (Pterophyllum eimekei): an analysis of the power stroke. J Exp Biol 82:255–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonduriansky R (2007a) Sexual selection and allometry: a critical reappraisal of the evidence and ideas. Evolution 61:838–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonduriansky R (2007b) The evolution of condition-dependent sexual dimorphism. Am Nat 169:9–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonduriansky R, Day T (2003) The evolution of static allometry in sexually selected traits. Evolution 57:2450–2458

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonduriansky R, Rowe L (2005) Sexual selection, genetic architecture, and the condition dependence of body shape in the sexually dimorphic fly Prochyliza xanthostoma (Piophilidae). Evolution 59:138–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo JJ, Møller AP (2009) The allometric pattern of sexually size dimorphic feather ornaments and factors affecting allometry. J Evol Biol 22:1503–1515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker E, Jensen J (1996) Pectoral fin locomotion in the striped surfperch. II. Scaling swimming kinematics and performance at a gait transition. J Exp Biol 199:2243–2252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egset CK, Hansen TF, Le Rouzic A, Bolstad GH, Rosenqvist G, Pélabon C (2012) Artificial selection on allometry: change in elevation but not slope. J Evol Biol 25:938–948

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen DJ (1996) Artificial selection on horn length-body size allometry in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Evolution 50(3):1219–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engqvist L (2005) The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim Behav 70:967–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell-Gray CC, Gotelli NJ (2005) Allometric exponents support a 3/4-power scaling law. Ecology 86:2083–2087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1974) The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover CJM (1982) Adaptations of fish in arid Australia. In: Barker WR, Greenslade PJM (eds) Evolution of the flora and fauna of arid Australia. Peacock, Adelaide, pp 241–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldbogen JA, Potvin J, Shadwick RE (2010) Skull and buccal cavity allometry increase mass-specific engulfment capacity in fin whales. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:861–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green AJ (1992) Positive allometry is likely with mate choice, competitive display and other functions. Anim Behav 43:170–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green AJ (1999) Allometry of genitalia in insects and spiders: one size does not fit all. Evolution 53:1621–1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankison SJ, Ptacek MB (2007) Within and between species variation in male mating behaviors in the Mexican sailfin mollies Poecilia velifera and P. petenensis. Ethology 113:802–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen TF, Bartoszek K (2012) Interpreting the evolutionary regression: the interplay between observational and biological errors in phylogenetic comparative studies. Syst Biol 61:413–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JC, Reynolds JD (1999) Costs of egg ventilation for male common gobies breeding in conditions of low dissolved oxygen. Anim Behav 57:181–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson B, Wickman PO (1990) Increase in reproductive effort as explained by body size and resource allocation in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria (L.). Funct Ecol 4:609–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klug H, Lindström K, Kokko H (2010) Who to include in measures of sexual selection is no trivial matter. Ecol Lett 13:1094–1102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kodric-Brown A, Sibly RM, Brown JH (2006) The allometry of ornaments and weapons. P Natl Acad Sci USA 103:8733–8738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiaho JS (2000) Testing the assumptions of conditional handicap theory: costs and condition dependence of a sexually selected trait. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:188–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Künzler R, Bakker TCM (2000) Pectoral fins and paternal quality in sticklebacks. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:999–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström K (1992) The effect of resource holding potential, nest size and information about resource quality on the outcome of intruder-owner conflicts in the sand goby. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström K, St. Mary C, Pampoulie C (2006) Sexual selection for male parental care in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maie T, Schoenfuss HL, Blob RW (2007) Ontogenetic scaling of body proportions in waterfall-climbing gobiid fishes from Hawai'i and Dominica: implications for locomotor function. Copeia 2007:755–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall LD (1990) Intraspecific variation in reproductive effort by female Parapediasia teterrella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and its relation to body size. Can J Zool 68:44–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA, Mousseau TA (1987) Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. Heredity 58:103–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe L, Houle D (1996) The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1415–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff CB (2000) Body size, body shape, and long bone strength in modern humans. J Hum Evol 38:269–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schluter D (1988) Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42:849–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Tomkins JL (1996) Sexual selection and the allometry of earwig forceps. Evol Ecol 10:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJ (1994) Degrees of freedom in interspecific allometry: an adjustment for the effects of phylogenetic constraint. Am J Phys Anthropol 93:95–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJ (2009) Use and misuse of the reduced major axis for line-fitting. Am J Phys Anthropol 140:476–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson PA, Lehtonen TK, Wong BBM (2012) A high aggression strategy for smaller males. PLoS One 7:e43121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney BW, Vannote RL, Dodds PJ (1986) Effects of temperature and food quality on growth and development of a mayfly, Leptophlebia intermedia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons N, Svensson PA, Wong BBM (2011) Do male desert gobies compromise offspring care to attract additional mating opportunities? PLoS One 6:e20576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins JL, Radwan J, Kotiaho JS, Tregenza T (2004) Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol Evol 19:323–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel S (1994) Life in moving fluids: the physical biology of flow, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M (2006) Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol Rev 81:259–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warton DI, Duursma RA, Falster DS, Taskinen S (2012) smatr 3—an R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines. Method Ecol Evol 3:257–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickman P-O, Karlsson B (1989) Abdomen size, body size and the reproductive effort of insects. Oikos 56:209–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong BBM, Svensson PA (2009) Strategic male signalling effort in a desert-dwelling fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:543–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Daniel Mosti for assistance with data collection, Joe Tomkins and David Warton for useful comments on the manuscript, and the Australian Research Council for funding.

Ethical standards

The experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emile van Lieshout.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Lindström

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Lieshout, E., Svensson, P.A. & Wong, B.B.M. Consequences of paternal care on pectoral fin allometry in a desert-dwelling fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67, 513–518 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1470-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1470-9

Keywords

Navigation