Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implant positioning in total hip arthroplasty: influence of horizontal and vertical offset on functionality of prosthetic hip joint

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the effect of implant position measured in terms of offset on patient reported outcomes (PRO) following hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

A total of 243 patients of the total hip replacement who had a one year follow-up were included in the study. Standard both hips radiograph was used to asses post-surgery implant position in terms of horizontal offset and vertical offset, and correlated with functional outcome which was evaluated as change in PRO. i.e., Harris hip score (HHS) post-op. With center of hip rotation as reference, horizontal offset was calculated as sum of distance, of centre, from proximal femoral shaft axis and a vertical line through ipsilateral teardrop, and vertical offset as limb length discrepancy. Post-op patients were classified into three groups depending on the measurement of horizontal offset of the operated hip. The patients having operated hip horizontal offset within 5 mm of the normal hip were grouped as restored offset (RO); those having shorter or higher offset by more than 5 mm compared to normal hip were labeled as decreased (DO) or increased offset (IO) group respectively. The groups were further subdivided into suboptimal and optimal function groups based on HHS, and among these groups, limb length discrepancy was evaluated.

Results

Post follow-up mean HHS (78.23 ± 9.96) improved significantly in all three groups (p < 0.0001). The difference in post-operative HHS among DO, RO, and IO groups was significant, with their averages being 72.5 ± 4.7, 82.1 ± 6.5, and 75.2 ± 4.8 respectively (p = .01). Limb length discrepancy was significantly more common in patients with suboptimal functional scores in all three groups.

Conclusion

This study concluded that both horizontal offset and vertical offset should be reconstructed in patients operated with unilateral THR due to hip pathology, since both factor demonstrated a comparable additive effect on clinical outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from institutional records but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of IEC.

References

  1. Harkess JW, Crockarell JR Jr (2021) Arthroplasty of the hip. In: Azar FM, Beaty JH (eds) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, 14th edn. Elsevier, Canada, pp 178–333

    Google Scholar 

  2. Singh JA, Lewallen D (2010) Predictors of pain and use of pain medications following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA): 5,707 THAs at 2-years and 3,289 THAs at 5-years. BMC MusculoskeletDisord 13(11):90. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh JA, Lewallen DG (2010) Predictors of activity limitation and dependence on walking aids after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Am GeriatrSoc 58:2387–2393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03182.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vissers MM, Bussmann JB, Verhaar JA, Arends LR, Furlan AD, Reijman M (2011) Recovery of physical functioning after total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. PhysTher 91(5):615–629. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams O, Fitzpatrick R, Hajat S et al (2002) Mortality, morbidity, and 1-year outcomes of primary elective total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:165–171. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.29389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. MacWilliam CH, Yood MU, Verner JJ et al (1996) Patient-related risk factors that predict poor outcome after total hip replacement. Health Serv Res 31:623–638

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hesseling B, Mathijssen NMC, van Steenbergen LN, Melles M, Vehmeijer SBW, Porsius JT (2019) Fast starters, slow starters, and late dippers: trajectories of patient-reported outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: results from a Dutch Nationwide Database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101(24):2175–2186. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lübbeke A, Zimmermann-Sloutskis D, Stern R, Roussos C, Bonvin A, Perneger T, Peter R, Hoffmeyer P (2014) Physical activity before and after primary total hip arthroplasty: a registry-based study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 66(2):277–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Slaven EJ (2012) Prediction of functional outcome at six months following total hip arthroplasty. PhysTher 92(11):1386–94. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20110484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nankaku M, Tsuboyama T, Akiyama H, Kakinoki R, Fujita Y, Nishimura J, Yoshioka Y, Kawai H, Matsuda S (2013) Preoperative prediction of ambulatory status at 6 months after total hip arthroplasty. PhysTher 93(1):88–93. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Quintana JM, Escobar A, Aguirre U, Lafuente I, Arenaza JC (2009) Predictors of health-related quality-of-life change after total hip arthroplasty. ClinOrthopRelat Res 467(11):2886–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0868-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Buirs LD, Van Beers LWAH, Scholtes VAB et al (2016) Predictors of physical functioning after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. BMJ Open 6:e010725. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M (2011) Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients. J Arthroplasty 26:209–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P (2012) What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open 2:e000435. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000435

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rojanasopondist P, Galea VP, Connelly JW et al (2019) What preoperative factors are associated with not achieving a minimum clinically important difference after THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study. ClinOrthopRelat Res 477(6):1301–1312. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhaskar D, Rajpura A, Board T (2017) Current concepts in acetabular positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop 51(4):386–396. https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_144_17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. JBJS 51A:737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Longo UG, Ciuffreda M, Candela V, Berton A, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2019) Hip scores: a current concept review. Br Med Bull 131(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldz026

  19. Grammatopoulos G, Falsetto A, Sanders E, Weishorn J, Gill HS, Beaulé PE, Innmann MM, Merle C (2021) Integrating the combined sagittal index reduces the risk of dislocation following total hip replacement. JBJS 10–2106. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.0043219

  20. Asayama I, Naito M, Fujisawa M, Kambe T (2002) Relationship between radiographic measurements of reconstructed hip joint position and the Trendelenburg sign. J Arthroplasty 17:747–751. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.33552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH (2002) Soft tissue balancing: the hip. J Arthroplasty 17:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.33263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Cerveri P, DeMomi E (2009) Bi-unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty: a matched paired study with early clinical results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:1157–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0713-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fackler CD, Poss R (1980) Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties. ClinOrthop 151:169–178

    Google Scholar 

  24. Davey JR, O’connor DO, Burke DW, Harris WH (1993) Femoral component offset. Its effect on strain in bone-cement. J Arthroplasty 8:23–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mcgrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD et al (1995) Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:865–869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Spalding TJ (1996) Effect of femoral offset on motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:997–998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cassidy KA, Noticewala MS, Macaulay W, Lee JH, Geller JA (2012) Effect of femoral offset on pain and function after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27:1863–1869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.05.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Incavo SJ, Havener T, Benson E et al (2004) Efforts to improve cementless femoral stems in THR: 2- to 5-year follow-up of a high-offset femoral stem with distal stem modification (Secur-Fit Plus). J Arthroplasty 19:61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2003.09.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McGrory, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME (1995) Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 77-B:865–869

  30. Erivan R, Aubret S, Villatte G, Mulliez A, Descamps S, Boisgard S (2017) Does using a polyethylene RM press-fit cup modify the preparation of the acetabulum and acetabular offset in primary hip arthroplasty? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(5):669–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.03.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shapira J, Chen SL, Rosinsky PJ, Maldonado DR, Meghpara M, Lall AC, Domb BG (2020) The effect of postoperative femoral offset on outcomes after hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Orthop 1(22):5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Konyves A, Bannister G (2005) The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(2):155–157. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.87b2.14878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McGrory B, Morrey B, Cahalan T, An K, Cabanela M (1995) Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(6):865–869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gore DR, Murray MP, Gardner GM, Sepic SB (1977) Roentgenographic measurements after müller total hip replacement. Correlations among roentgenographic measurements and hip strength and mobility. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59(7):948–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sayed-Noor AS, Hugo A, Sjödén GO, Wretenberg P (2009) Leg length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of two methods of measurement. IntOrthop 33(5):1189–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0633-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sayed-Noor AS, Sjoden GO (2006) Greater trochanteric pain after total hip arthroplasty: the incidence, clinical outcome and associated factors. Hip Int 16(3):202–206. https://doi.org/10.5301/hip.2008.4186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rösler J, Perka C (2000) The effect of anatomical positional relationships on kinetic parameters after total hip replacement. Int Orthop 24(1):23–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002640050006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Mancuso CA, Jout J, Salvati EA, Sculco TP (2009) Fulfillment of patients’ expectations for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2073–2078. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang Y, He W, Cheng T et al (2015) Total hip arthroplasty: leg length discrepancy affects functional outcomes and patient’s gait. Cell BiochemBiophys 72(1):215–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-014-0440-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Plaass C, Clauss M, Ochsner PE, Ilchmann T (2011) Influence of leg length discrepancy on clinical results after total hip arthroplasty-a prospective clinical trial. Hip Int 21(4):441–449. https://doi.org/10.5301/HIP.2011.8575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Erivan R, Muller AS, Villatte G, Millerioux S, Mulliez A, Boisgard S, Descamps S (2020) Short stems reproduce femoral offset better than standard stems in total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study. Int Orthop 44(1):45–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04355-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Luger M, Feldler S, Klasan A, Gotterbarm T, Schopper C (2021) The morphology of the proximal femur in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty: no negative effect on offset reconstruction, leg length difference and implant positioning. J Orthop Surg Res 16(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02876-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by KS, MA, and AV. The first draft of the manuscript was written by KS and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. NK, RA, and HKR helped in statistical analysis and manuscript review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. RC supervised all the things.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamaldeep Singh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of DR. S. N. Medical College and associated group of hospitals, Jodhpur (Date-27/04/2018, No.F.1 Acad/MC/Ju/18/6909).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

Consent for publication

Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vaishy, A., Arif, M., Aanand, R. et al. Implant positioning in total hip arthroplasty: influence of horizontal and vertical offset on functionality of prosthetic hip joint. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 46, 1501–1506 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05364-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05364-7

Keywords

Navigation