Skip to main content
Log in

Biomechanical evaluation of different surgical techniques for treating patellar tendon ruptures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to biomechanically assess patellar tendon repair techniques with additional cable wire or polydioxanone suture (PDS) cord augmentation in comparison with a suture-anchor repair technique.

Methods

Patellar tendon repair was performed in 60 specimens using a porcine bone model. Yield load, maximum load, stiffness and elongation of patellar tendon reconstructions with (1) cable wire augmentation, (2) PDS cord augmentation or (3) suture anchor repair were evaluated using a cyclic loading and load-to-failure test setup.

Results

In comparison with suture anchor repair, augmentation of the reconstruction with either cable wires or PDS cords provides significantly higher maximum loads (527 and 460 N vs. 301 N; p < 0.01 and p = 0,012, respectively) under load-to-failure testing and less elongation (8.81 mm ± 1.55 mm and 10.56 mm ± 3.1 mm vs. 18.38 mm ± 7.51 mm; p = 0.037 and p = 0.033, respectively) under cyclic loading conditions.

Conclusion

Augmentation of a patellar tendon repair with either a cable wire or a PDS cord provides higher primary stability than suture anchor repair in patellar tendon ruptures. The study supports the use of additional augmentation of a tendon repair in the clinical setting in order to prevent loss of reduction and allow for early post-operative mobilisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahrberg A, Josten C (2007) Augmentation of patella fractures and patella tendon ruptures with the McLaughlin-Cerclage. Unfallchirurg 110(8):685–690. doi:10.1007/s00113-007-1269-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bushnell BD, Byram IR, Weinhold PS, Creighton RA (2006) The use of suture anchors in repair of the ruptured patellar tendon: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 34(9):1492–1499. doi:10.1177/0363546506287489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bushnell BD, Tennant JN, Rubright JH, Creighton RA (2008) Repair of patellar tendon rupture using suture anchors. J Knee Surg 21(2):122–129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Capiola D, Re L (2007) Repair of patellar tendon rupture with suture anchors. Arthroscopy 23(8):906.e901–906.e904. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2006.10.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Daentzer D, Rudert M, Wirth CJ, Stukenborg-Colsman C (2012) Reconstruction of the patella with an autogenous iliac graft: clinical and radiologic results in thirteen patients. Int Orthop 36(3):545–552. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1281-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Doral MN (2013) What is the effect of the early weight-bearing mobilisation without using any support after endoscopy-assisted Achilles tendon repair? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(6):1378–1384. doi:10.1007/s00167-012-2222-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ettinger M, Dratzidis A, Hurschler C, Brand S, Calliess T, Krettek C, Jagodzinski M, Petri M (2013) Biomechanical properties of suture anchor repair compared with transosseous sutures in patellar tendon ruptures: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 41(11):2540–2544. doi:10.1177/0363546513500633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Flanigan DC, Bloomfield M, Koh J (2011) A biomechanical comparison of patellar tendon repair materials in a bovine model. Orthopedics 34(8):e344–e348. doi:10.3928/01477447-20110627-13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grim C, Lorbach O, Engelhardt M (2010) Quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures. Orthopade 39(12):1127–1134. doi:10.1007/s00132-010-1690-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Herbort M, Raschke MJ (2011) Ligament ruptures of the lower extremity in the elderly. Unfallchirurg 114(8):671–680. doi:10.1007/s00113-011-2022-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kadar A, Sherman H, Drexler M, Katz E, Steinberg EL (2015) Anchor suture fixation of distal pole fractures of patella: twenty seven cases and comparison to partial patellectomy. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2776-9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kasten P, Schewe B, Maurer F, Gosling T, Krettek C, Weise K (2001) Rupture of the patellar tendon: a review of 68 cases and a retrospective study of 29 ruptures comparing two methods of augmentation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121(10):578–582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Krackow KA, Thomas SC, Jones LC (1986) A new stitch for ligament-tendon fixation. Brief note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68(5):764–766

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Langenhan R, Baumann M, Ricart P, Hak D, Probst A, Badke A, Trobisch P (2012) Postoperative functional rehabilitation after repair of quadriceps tendon ruptures: a comparison of two different protocols. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(11):2275–2278. doi:10.1007/s00167-012-1887-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lenschow S, Herbort M, Strasser A, Strobel M, Raschke M, Petersen W, Zantop T (2011) Structural properties of a new device for graft fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction: the shim technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(8):1067–1072. doi:10.1007/s00402-011-1276-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lenschow S, Schliemann B, Schulze M, Raschke M, Kosters C (2014) Comparison of outside-in and inside-out technique for tibial fixation of a soft-tissue graft in ACL reconstruction using the Shim technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(9):1293–1299. doi:10.1007/s00402-014-2029-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu SH, Kabo JM, Osti L (1995) Biomechanics of two types of bone-tendon-bone graft for ACL reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 77(2):232–235

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marder RA, Timmerman LA (1999) Primary repair of patellar tendon rupture without augmentation. Am J Sports Med 27(3):304–307

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mc LH (1947) Repair of major tendon ruptures by buried removable suture. Am J Surg 74(5):758–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mittlmeier T, Ewert A (2001) Injuries of the knee joint extensor system. Unfallchirurg 104(4):344–356, quiz 356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nurmi JT, Sievanen H, Kannus P, Jarvinen M, Jarvinen TL (2004) Porcine tibia is a poor substitute for human cadaver tibia for evaluating interference screw fixation. Am J Sports Med 32(3):765–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ochman S, Langer M, Petersen W, Meffert RH, Tillmann B, Raschke MJ (2005) Rupture of the quadriceps tendon. Diagnosis and treatment of a rare injury. Unfallchirurg 108(6):436–444. doi:10.1007/s00113-005-0957-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Patel VC, Lozano-Calderon S, McWilliam J (2012) Immediate weight bearing after modified percutaneous Achilles tendon repair. Foot Ankle Int 33(12):1093–1097. doi:10.3113/FAI.2012.1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramseier LE, Werner CM, Heinzelmann M (2006) Quadriceps and patellar tendon rupture. Injury 37(6):516–519. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2005.12.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Raschke D, Schuttrumpf JP, Tezval M, Sturmer KM, Balcarek P (2014) Extensor-mechanism-reconstruction of the knee joint after traumatic loss of the entire extensor apparatus. Knee 21(3):793–796. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2014.02.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ravalin RV, Mazzocca AD, Grady-Benson JC, Nissen CW, Adams DJ (2002) Biomechanical comparison of patellar tendon repairs in a cadaver model: an evaluation of gap formation at the repair site with cyclic loading. Am J Sports Med 30(4):469–473

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weimann A, Heinkele T, Herbort M, Schliemann B, Petersen W, Raschke MJ (2013) Minimally invasive reconstruction of lateral tibial plateau fractures using the jail technique: a biomechanical study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14(1):120. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-14-120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedikt Schliemann.

Additional information

Benedikt Schliemann and Niklas Grüneweller contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schliemann, B., Grüneweller, N., Yao, D. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of different surgical techniques for treating patellar tendon ruptures. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 1717–1723 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3003-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3003-4

Keywords

Navigation