Abstract
The free hand technique remains the most popular method for distal locking; however, radiation exposure is a major concern. In an endeavour to overcome this concern, distal locking with the nail over nail technique is evaluated. Seventy patients with femoral diaphyseal fractures treated by intramedullary nailing were divided in two groups for distal locking: either using the free hand technique (group I) or with the nail over nail technique (group II). The average number of images taken to achieve nail insertion without locking, for distal locking, and for the complete procedure in group I was 25.8, 24.2, and 50.08, respectively, compared with 24.8, 4.1, and 28.9, respectively, in group II (statistically extremely significant decrease in radiation). The nail over nail technique appears to be a reliable solution for decreasing radiation exposure during closed femoral intramedullary nailing. However, over-reaming of 1.5 mm is the key to the success of the technique.
Résumé
Le verrouillage à main levée est une technique populaire cependant, le problème de l’irradiation demeure important. Nous avons voulu l’évaluer lors du verrouillage des clous centro-médullaires. 70 patients présentant une fracture de la diaphyse fémorale ont été traités par enclouage centro-médullaire divisés en deux groupes, verrouillage distal à main levée (groupe I) et verrouillage selon la technique « nail over nail » (groupe II). le nombre d’image moyen nécessaire pour mettre en place le clou avec un verrouillage distal où lors de la procédure complète a été respectivement, pour le groupe I de 25,8, 24,2 et 50,08 comparé à 24,8, 4,1 et 28,9 pour le groupe II (différence extrêmement significative en ce qui concerne la diminution de l’irradiation). la technique « nail over nail » apparaît comme une technique fiable et permet une diminution de l’exposition aux rayons X lors de l’enclouage fémoral. Cependant, il est nécessaire de rappeler qu’un alésage supérieur à 1,5 mm est la clef du succès de cette technique.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiyer S, Jagiasi J, Argekar H, Sharan S, Dasgupta B (2006) Closed antegrade interlocked nailing of femoral shaft fractures operated up to 2 weeks postinjury in the absence of a fracture table or c-arm. J Trauma 61:457–460
Bong MR, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, Eqol KA (2007) Intramedullary nailing of the lower extremity: biomechanics and biology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15(2):97–106
Goodall JD (1991) An image intensifier laser guidance system for the distal locking of an intramedullary nail. Injury 22:339
Hajek PD, Bicknell HR Jr, Bronson WE, Albright JA, Saha S (1993) The use of one compared with two distal screws in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures with interlocking intramedullary nailing. A clinical and biomechanical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 75A:519–525
Kanellopoulos AD, Yiannakopoulos CK, Vossinakis I, Badras LS (2003) Distal locking of femoral nails under direct vision through a cortical window. J Orthop Trauma 17(8):574–577
Krettek C, Konemann B, Miclau T, Kolbli R, Machreich T, Kromm A, Tscherne H (1999) A mechanical distal aiming device for distal locking in femoral nails. Clin Orthop 364:267–275
Levin PE, Schoen RW, Browner BD (1987) Radiation exposure to the surgeon during closed interlocking intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg 69A:761–766
Mehlman CT, DiPasquale TG (1997) Radiation exposure to the orthopaedic surgical team during fluoroscopy: "How far away is far enough?" J Orthop Trauma 11:392–398
Muller LP, Suffner J, Wenda K, Mohr W, Rommens PM (1998) Radiation exposure to the hands and the thyroid of the surgeon during intramedullary nailing. Injury 29:461–468
Owen TD, Coorsh J (1993) Insertion of the distal locking screws in femoral nailing: a simplified technique. Injury 24:101–103
Pardiwala D, Prabhu V, Dudhniwala G, Katre R (2001) The AO distal locking aiming device: an evaluation of efficacy and learning curve. Injury 32:713–718
Rao JP, Allegra MP, Benevenia J, Dauhajre TA (1989) Distal screw targeting of interlocking nails. Clin Orthop 238:245–248
Steriopoulos KA, Kontakis GM, Kantonis PG, Galanakis IA, Dretakis EK (1996) Placement of the distal locking screws of the femoral intramedullary nail without radiation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 115:43–44
Suhm N, Messmer P, Zuna I, Jacob LA, Reqazzoni P (2004) Fluoroscopic guidance versus surgical navigation for distal locking of intramedullary implants: A prospective, controlled clinical study. Injury 35:567–574
Tanna DD (1994) Interlocking tibial nailing without an image intensifier. J Bone Joint Surg 76B:670
Tyropoulos S, Garnavos C (2001) A new distal targeting device for closed interlocking nailing. Injury 32:732–735
Whatling GM, Nokes LDM (2006) Literature review of current techniques for the insertion of distal screws into intramedullary locking nails. Injury 37:109–119
Whittle AP, Wood GW (2003) Fractures of lower extremity. In: Canale ST (ed) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 2841–2845
Wu CC, Shih CH (1992) Biomechanical analysis of the mechanism of interlocking nail failure. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 111(5):268–272
Yiannakopoulos CK, Kanellopoulos AD, Apostolou C, Antonoqiannakis E, Korres DS (2005) Distal intramedullary nail interlocking: the flag and grid technique. J Orthop Trauma 19(6):407–411
Zheng G, Zhang X, Haschtmann D, Gedet P, Lanqlotz F, Nolte LP (2007) Accurate and reliable pose recovery of distal locking holes in computer-assisted intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: a preliminary study. Comput Aided Surg 12:138–151
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rohilla, R., Singh, R., Magu, N. et al. Nail over nail technique for distal locking of femoral intramedullary nails. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 33, 1107–1112 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0579-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0579-y