Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous image-guided sternal biopsy: a cross-institutional retrospective review of diagnostic yield and safety in 50 cases

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Image-guided sternal biopsy may be technically daunting given the immediately subjacent critical structures. There is a paucity of literature describing technique, safety, and efficacy. This study aims to quantify the diagnostic yield and safety of image-guided sternal biopsies. Secondary aims include (1) describing the preferred approach/technique and (2) identifying imaging features and disease entities associated with higher and lower diagnostic yields.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of 50 image-guided sternal biopsies performed at two quaternary care centers from 2000 to 2019 was performed. Recorded lesion-related variables included as follows: location, density, extraosseous extension, and size. Recorded variables from electronic medical records included as follows: patient demographics, histologic or microbiological diagnosis, and complications. Recorded technique-related variables included as follows: needle obliquity, type, and gauge; biopsy core number and length; and modality.

Results

Of the 50 biopsies, 88.0% resulted in a definitive histologic diagnosis. Six biopsies were non-diagnostic. The majority of biopsies were performed under computed tomography (88.0%), followed by ultrasound (12.0%). Tumor was the most common biopsy indication (90.0%), followed by infection (10.0%). Of the diagnostic biopsies indicated for tumor, 88.9% were malignant. Seventy-four percent of the lesions were predominantly lytic. Fifty percent of lesions had extraosseous extension. Lesion locations were as follows: manubrium (48.0%), sternal body (48.0%), and sternomanubrial joint (4.0%). No minor or major, acute, or delayed procedure-related complications were encountered.

Conclusion

Image-guided sternal biopsy is an efficacious and safe method of obtaining a definitive histologic diagnosis regardless of lesion-specific features or location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meek RD, Mills MK, Hanrahan CJ, et al. Pearls and pitfalls for soft-tissue and bone biopsies: a cross-institutional review. Radiographics. 2020;40(1):266–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sung KS, Seo SW, Shon MS. The diagnostic value of needle biopsy for musculoskeletal lesions. Int Orthop. 2009;33(6):1701–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi JJ, Davis KW, Blankenbaker DG. Percutaneous musculoskeletal biopsy. Semin Roentgenol. 2004;39(1):114–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Espinosa LA, Jamadar DA, Jacobson JA, et al. CT-guided biopsy of bone: a radiologist’s perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(5):W283–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Welch BT, Welch TJ. Percutaneous image-guided biopsy of the musculoskeletal system. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;14(3):110–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Song Y, Kwon JW. Percutaneous CT-guided sternal biopsy: factors affecting the diagnostic yield. Acta Radiol. 2017;58(7):825–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rimondi E, Rossi G, Bartalena T, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of the musculoskeletal system: results of 2027 cases. Eur J Radiol. 2011;77(1):34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Restrepo CS, Martinez S, Lemos DF, et al. Imaging appearances of the sternum and sternoclavicular joints. Radiographics. 2009;29(3):839–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shin MS, Berland LL, Ho KJ. Computed tomography evaluation of primary and secondary sternal neoplasms. J Comput Tomogr. 1986;10(1):27–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Downey RJ, Huvos AG, Martini N. Primary and secondary malignancies of the sternum. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;11(3):293–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Incarbone M, Nava M, Lequaglie C, Ravasi G, Pastorino U. Sternal resection for primary or secondary tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114(1):93–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang CY, Huang AJ, Bredella MA, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided needle biopsies of musculoskeletal tumors: a 5-year analysis of non-diagnostic biopsies. Skelet Radiol. 2015;44(12):1795–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Didolkar MM, Anderson ME, Hochman MG, et al. Image guided core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions: are nondiagnostic results clinically useful? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(11):3601–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Omura MC, Motamedi K, UyBico S, Nelson SD, Seeger LL. Revisiting CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions: contributors to biopsy success. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(2):457–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baffour FI, Moynagh MR, Eiken PW, et al. Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous CT-guided rib biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(1):82–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jakanani GC, Saifuddin A. Percutaneous image-guided needle biopsy of rib lesions: a retrospective study of diagnostic outcome in 51 cases. Skelet Radiol. 2013;42(1):85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tomasian A, Hillen TJ, Jennings JW. Percutaneous CT-guided skull biopsy: feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield. Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40(2):309–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li N, Maresh G, Cretcher M et al A modern non-SQL approach to radiology-centric search engine design with clinical validation. ArXIV. July 2020:2007.02124

  19. Khalilzadeh O, Baerlocher MO, Shyn PB, et al. Proposal of a new adverse event classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(10):1432–1437.e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu JS, Goldsmith JD, Horwich PJ, Shetty SK, Hochman MG. Bone and soft-tissue lesions: what factors affect diagnostic yield of image-guided core-needle biopsy? Radiology. 2008;248(3):962–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hwang S, Lefkowitz RA, Landa J, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided bone biopsy: diagnosis of malignancy in lesions with initially indeterminate biopsy results and CT features associated with diagnostic or indeterminate results. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(6):1417–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang J, Frassica FJ, Fayad L, Clark DP, Weber KL. Analysis of nondiagnostic results after image-guided needle biopsies of musculoskeletal lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(11):3103–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Unni KK. Dahlin’s bone tumors: general aspects and data on 11,087 cases. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Douglas YL, Meuzelaar KJ, Van Der Lei B, Pras B, Hoekstra HJ. Osteosarcoma of the sternum. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1997;23(1):90–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Burt M. Primary malignant tumors of the chest wall. The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1994;4(1):137–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu JS, McMahon CJ, Lozano-Calderon S, Kung JW. Utility of repeat core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions with initially nondiagnostic findings. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(3):609–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Said N, Chalian M, Fox MG, Nacey NC. Percutaneous image-guided bone biopsy of osteomyelitis in the foot and pelvis has a low impact on guiding antibiotics management: a retrospective analysis of 60 bone biopsies. Skelet Radiol. 2019;48(9):1385–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eng J, Sabanathan S, Pradhan GN, Mearns AJ. Primary bony chest wall tumours. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1990;35(1):44–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kwai AH, Stomper PC, Kaplan WD. Clinical significance of isolated scintigraphic sternal lesions in patients with breast cancer. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. 1988;29(3):324–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Toussirot E, Gallinet E, Augé B, Voillat L, Wendling D. Anterior chest wall malignancies. A review of ten cases. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1998;65(6):397–405.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahmad U, Yang H, Sima C, et al. Resection of primary and secondary tumors of the sternum: an analysis of prognostic variables. In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 100. USA: Elsevier; 2015. p. 215–22.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lee AY, Navarro R, Busby LP, et al. Characterization of metastatic sternal lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI in women with invasive breast cancer. Acad Radiol. 2019;26(10):1358–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We give our most sincere thanks to Dr. Ningcheng (Peter) Li, Dr. Judy Gichoya, and Guy Maresh for their development and continuous support of the OHSU Radiology Search Engine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ningcheng (Peter) Li.

Ethics declarations

The study received approval from the institutional review board.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, N.(., Wingfield, M.A., Mills, M.K. et al. Percutaneous image-guided sternal biopsy: a cross-institutional retrospective review of diagnostic yield and safety in 50 cases. Skeletal Radiol 50, 495–504 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03587-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03587-6

Keywords

Navigation