Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reliability of patellotrochlear index in patellar height assessment on MRI—correction for variation due to change in knee flexion

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the reliability of patellotrochlear Index (PTI) in patellar height assessment on successive MRI scans in asymptomatic patients.

Materials and methods

Sixty-four patients with two successive MRI scans (128 studies) of the same knee for non-patellofemoral joint symptoms were identified retrospectively. PTI and knee flexion angle were assessed independently by three observers to assess interobserver reliability. The effect of knee flexion on PTI was assessed by comparing the change in values of PTI in each patient correlated with change in knee flexion.

Results

Sixty-four MRIs of patients (M:F) aged between 18 and 35 years (mean 24.6) years were assessed. The mean PTI for initial scan group was 0.33% (95% CI: 0.29–0.37; SD: 0.15) and consecutive scan group was 0.30% (CI: 0.27–0.33; SD: 0.3). The difference was not significant (p = 0.097 using a paired t test) with high inter-observer correlation (0.9) in both sets. Spearman’s rho for knee flexion angle and PTI was found to be positive and statistically significant (0.41; p = 0.001). A linear regression model was derived using a scatter chart of change in PTI with change in knee flexion for each patient. The gradient of the linear regression line was used to estimate a cPTI (corrected PTI) value (corrected to 0 degrees of knee flexion), defined as cPTI = PTI – 1.3a (a = knee flexion angle).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates high inter-observer correlation of PTI on MRI and high test–retest reliability indicating unconscious quadriceps contraction does not change the index sufficiently. Knee flexion significantly alters PTI, increased patellotrochlear engagement with flexion increases the index. We propose use of the formula cPTI = PTI -1.3a to correct the index to 0 degree knee flexion in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ali SA, Helmer R, Terk MR. Patella Alta: lack of correlation between patellotrochlear cartilage congruence and commonly used patellar height ratios. AJR. 2009;193:1361–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. MJ AL-S, Cameron JC. Functional outcome after tibial tubercle transfer for the painful patella alta. Clin Orthop. 2002;396:152–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Karadimas JE, Piscopakis N, Syrmalis L. Patella alta and chondromalacia. Int Orthop. 1981;5:247–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier C. Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic-radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994;2(1):19–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Monk AP, Doll HA, Gibbons CL, Ostlere S, Beard DJ, Gill HS, et al. The pathoanatomy of patellofemoral subluxation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2011;93(10):1341–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Biedert RM, Albrecht S. The patella-trochlear index: a new index for assessing patellar height. Knee Surg SportsTraumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(8):707–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kobayashi S, Pappas E, Fransen M, Refshauge K, Simic M. The prevalence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24(10):1697–707.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Staubli HU, Bosshard C, Porcellini B, Rauschning W. Magnetic resonance imaging for articular cartilage: cartilage-bone mismatch. Clin Sports Med. 2002;21:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Huyssteen AL, Hendrix MRG, Barnett AJ, Wakeley CJ, Eldridge JDJ. Cartilage-bone mismatch in the dysplastic trochlea—an MRI study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2006;81-B:688–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Caton J, Deschamps G, Chambat P, Lerat JL, Dejour H. Patella-infera. Apropos of 128 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1982;68(5):317–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Insall J, Salvati E. Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology. 1971;101(1):101–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grelsamer RP, Meadows S. The modified Insall-Salvati ratio for assessment of patellar height. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;282:170–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blackburne JS, Peel TE. A new method of measuring patellar height. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1977;59(2):241–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller TT, Staron RB, Feldman F. Patellar height on sagittal MR imaging of the knee. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167(2):339–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shabshin N, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, Parker L. MRI criteria for patella Alta and Baja. Skelet Radiol. 2004;33(8):445–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-004-0794-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Seil R, Muller B, Georg T, Kohn D, Rupp S. Reliability and interobserver variability in radiological patella height ratios. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8:231–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Becher C, Fleischer B, Rase M, et al. Effects of upright weight bearing and the knee flexion angle on patellofemoral indices using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with patellofemoral instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(8):2405–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3829-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grelsamer RP, Proctor CS, Bazos AN. Evaluation of patellar shape in the sagittal plane. A clinical analysis. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:61–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barnett AJ, Prentice M, Mandalia V, Wakeley CJ, Eldridge JD. Patellar height measurement in trochlear dysplasia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(12):1412–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Camathias C, Pagenstert G, Stutz U, Barg A, Muller-Gerbl M, Nowakowski AM. The effect of knee flexion and rotation on the tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3508.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the help of Mr. Roman Wesolowski and Mr. Robert Flintham, Clinical Scientists, Department of Medical Physics and Mr. Callum Smith, Department of Imaging, in conducting part of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Choudhary.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The authors confirm this work complies with ethical principles regarding content of work. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmad, M., Janardhan, S., Amerasekera, S. et al. Reliability of patellotrochlear index in patellar height assessment on MRI—correction for variation due to change in knee flexion. Skeletal Radiol 48, 387–393 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-3040-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-3040-3

Keywords

Navigation