Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unveiling the ‘unique bone’: a study of the distribution of focal clavicular lesions

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

Clavicle is a unique bone for many reasons. There is no study discussing the differential diagnosis of clavicular lesions based on the site of occurrence or age at presentation. This study aims to determine whether the distribution of lesions affecting the clavicle and age at presentation aid in the differential diagnosis of focal clavicular lesions.

Materials and methods

Clinical notes, imaging and histopathological reports of the clavicular lesions between Jan 1999 and Jan 2006 were reviewed. Virtually, all patients had been referred as suspected neoplasm.

Results

Fifty-nine patients were identified. Patients <20 years (n = 27) had non-neoplastic or benign lesions. Patients between 20–50 years (n = 14) had predominantly non-neoplastic lesions. Patients >50 years (n = 18) had predominantly malignant lesions. The lesions most commonly affected the medial third (n = 35) and were predominantly non-neoplastic or benign. The middle third was affected in 15 patients and showed both benign and malignant lesions. The lateral third was least affected with predominance of malignant lesions.

Conclusions

The clavicle is not a primary common site for any particular tumour; hence, diagnosis of the lesions can be challenging. Our study has suggested that few factors like age and site of the lesions may be helpful in diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumar R, Madewell JE, Swischuk LE, Lindell MM, David R. The clavicle: normal and abnormal. Radiographics 1989; 9 4: 677–706, Jul.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Giedion A, Holthusen W, Masel LF, Vischer D. Subacute and chronic “symmetrical” osteomyelitis. Ann Radiol (Paris) 1972; 15 3: 329–342, Mar–Apr.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kasperczyk A, Freyschmidt J. Pustulotic arthroosteitis: spectrum of bone lesions with palmoplantar pustulosis. Radiology 1994; 191: 207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chamot AM, Benhamou CL, Kahn MF, Beraneck L, Kaplan G, Prost A. Acne-pustulosis-hyperostosis–osteitis syndrome. Results of a national survey. 85 cases. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 1987; 54 3: 187–196, Mar.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beretta-Piccoli BC, Sauvain MJ, Gal I, et al. Synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome in childhood: a report of ten cases and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr 2000; 159 8: 594–601, Aug.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schuster T, Bielek J, Dietz HG, Belohradsky BH. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO). Eur J Pediatr Surg 1996; 6 1: 45–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sundaram M, McDonald D, Engel E, Rotman M, Siegfried EC. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: an evolving clinical and radiological spectrum. Skelet Radiol 1996; 25 4: 333–336, May.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bjorksten B, Boquist L. Histopathological aspects of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1980; 62 3: 376–380, Aug.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hummell DS, Anderson SJ, Wright PF, Cassell GH, Waites KB. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: are mycoplasmas involved. N Engl J Med 1987; 317 8: 510–511.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Manson D, Wilmot DM, King S, Laxer RM. Physeal involvement in chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. Pediatr Radiol 1989; 20 1–2: 76–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kozlowski K, Masel J, Harbison S, Yu J. Multifocal chronic osteomyelitis of unknown etiology. Report of five cases. Pediatr Radiol 1983; 13 3: 130–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Toussirot E, Dupond JL, Wendling D. Spondylodiscitis in SAPHO syndrome. A series of eight cases. Ann Rheum Dis 1997; 56 1: 52–58, Jan.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith J, Yuppa F, Watson RC. Primary tumors and tumor-like lesions of the clavicle. Skelet Radiol 1988; 17 4: 235–246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thai DM, Kitagawa Y, Choong PFM. Outcome of surgical management of bony metastases to the humerus and shoulder girdle: a retrospective analysis of 93 patients. Int Semin Surg Oncol 2006; 1 3: 5, Mar.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brower AC, Sweet DE, Keats TE. Condensing osteitis of the clavicle: a new entity. AJR 1974; 121 1: 17–21, May.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Greenspan A, Gerscovich E, Szabo RM, Matthews JG 2nd. Condensing osteitis of the clavicle: a rare but frequently misdiagnosed condition. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156 5: 1011–1015, May.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kruger GD, Rock MG, Munro TG. Condensing osteitis of the clavicle. A review of the literature and report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69 4: 550–557, Apr.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fanquet T, et al. Condensing osteitis of the clavicle. Report of two new cases. Skelet Radiol 1985; 14 3: 184–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Outwater E, Oates E. Condensing osteitis of the clavicle: case report and review of the literature. J Nucl Med 1988; 29 6: 1122–1125, Jun.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Saifuddin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suresh, S., Saifuddin, A. Unveiling the ‘unique bone’: a study of the distribution of focal clavicular lesions. Skeletal Radiol 37, 749–756 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0507-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0507-7

Keywords

Navigation