Abstract
Ecological interactions between different species of yeasts have been observed and described extensively, but the mechanisms of interaction remain poorly understood. A hindrance to the characterization of multispecies yeast ecosystems is the lack of accurate methods for rapid real-time analysis of population dynamics in synthetic multispecies consortia. Here, we sought to accelerate and improve the sensitivity of ecological modelling and characterization of a synthetic yeast ecosystem by developing a flow cytometry–based method that tracks and sorts fluorescently tagged individual yeast species in real time during growth in model multispecies consortia. A protocol for integrative genetic modification of non-conventional yeasts was developed. The application of the method was demonstrated in a model four-species synthetic wine-yeast ecosystem that consisted of species commonly isolated from natural wine fermentations. The data show that this method allows for rapid generation of meaningful ecological data that contributes to our understanding of multispecies synthetic yeast ecosystems. Furthermore, interspecies interactions have been shown to impact the evolution of yeasts in natural ecosystems, and this platform will provide an ideal tool to better evaluate the impact of biotic selection pressures.
Key Points • Fluorescent labelling of yeast species in a consortium for multicolour flow cytometry • Method developed to track population dynamics of multispecies yeast consortia • Enables real-time visualization, manipulation and response analyses of population dynamics • Produces accurate, reproducible data with powerful visual analyses potential at a rapid rate |
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adan A, Alizada G, Kiraz Y, Baran Y, Nalbant A (2017) Flow cytometry: basic principles and applications. Crit Rev Biotechnol 37:163–176. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2015.1128876
Alonso-del-Real J, Pérez-Torrado R, Querol A, Barrio E (2019) Dominance of wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains over S. kudriavzevii in industrial fermentation competitions is related to an acceleration of nutrient uptake and utilization. Environ Microbiol 21:1627–1644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14536
Andrade-Domínguez A, Salazar E, Del Carmen Vargas-Lagunas M, Kolter R, Encarnación S (2014) Eco-evolutionary feedbacks drive species interactions. ISME J 8:1041–1054. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.208
Bagheri B, Bauer FF, Setati ME (2017) The impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on a wine yeast consortium in natural and inoculated fermentations. Front Microbiol 8:169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01988
Bagheri B, Zambelli P, Vigentini I, Bauer FF, Setati ME (2018) Investigating the effect of selected non-Saccharomyces species on wine ecosystem function and major volatiles. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 6:169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00169
Bely M, Sablayrolles J, Barre P (1990) Automatic detection of assimilable nitrogen deficiencies during alcoholic fermentation in enological conditions. J Ferment Bioeng 70:246–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0922-338X(90)90057-4
Bialecka-fornal M, Makushok T, Rafelski SM (2016) A review of fluorescent proteins for use in yeast. Methods Mol Biol 1369:309–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3145-3_21
Brown MR, Hands CL, Coello-Garcia T, Sani BS, Ott AIG, Smith SJ, Davenport RJ (2019) A flow cytometry method for bacterial quantification and biomass estimates in activated sludge. J Microbiol Methods 160:73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2019.03.022
Comitini F, Gobbi M, Domizio P, Romani C, Lencioni L, Mannazzu I, Ciani M (2011) Selected non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts in controlled multistarter fermentations with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food Microbiol 28:873–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.12.001
Conacher CG, Rossouw D, Bauer FFB (2019) Peer pressure: evolutionary responses to biotic pressures in wine yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res 19:foz072. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foz072
Davey HM, Hexley P (2011) Red but not dead? Membranes of stressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae are permeable to propidium iodide. Environ Microbiol 13:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02317.x
Davey HM, Winson MK (2003) Using flow cytometry to quantify microbial heterogeneity. Curr Issues Mol Biol 5:9–15. https://doi.org/10.21775/cimb.005.009
Diz AP, Martínez-Fernández M, Rolán-Alvarez E (2012) Proteomics in evolutionary ecology: linking the genotype with the phenotype. Mol Ecol 21:1060–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05426.x
Friedman J, Gore J (2017) Ecological systems biology: the dynamics of interacting populations. Curr Opin Syst Biol 1:114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coisb.2016.12.001
Goers L, Freemont P, Polizzi K (2014) Co-culture systems and technologies: taking synthetic biology to the next level. J R Soc Interface 11:20140065. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0065
Hart SFM, Skelding D, Waite AJ, Burton JC, Shou W (2019) High-throughput quantification of microbial birth and death dynamics using fluorescence microscopy. Quant Biol 7:69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40484-018-0160-7
Henschke PA, Jiranek V (1993) Yeasts: metabolism of nitrogen compounds. In: Fleet GH (ed) Wine microbiology and biotechnology. Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur, pp 77–164
Heyse J, Buysschaert B, Props R, Rubbens P, Skirtach AG, Waegeman W, Boon N (2019) Coculturing bacteria leads to reduced phenotypic heterogeneities. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e02814–e02818. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02814-18
Higuchi-sanabria R, Garcia EJ, Tomoiaga D, Munteanu EL (2016) Characterization of fluorescent proteins for three- and four-color live-cell imaging in S. cerevisiae. PLoS One 11:e0146120. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146120
Ito-Harashima S, Yagi T (2017) Unique molecular mechanisms for maintenance and alteration of genetic information in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Environ 39:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41021-017-0088-6
Janke C, Magiera MM, Rathfelder N, Taxis C, Reber S (2004) A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast. 21:947–962. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1142
Jiranek V, Bauer F, Takagi H (2019) Editorial: yeast ecology and interaction. FEMS Yeast Res 19:foz073. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foz073
Kato S, Haruta S, Cui ZJ, Ishii M, Igarashi Y (2008) Network relationships of bacteria in a stable mixed culture. Microb Ecol 56:403–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9357-4
Kim HJ, Boedicker JQ, Choi JW, Ismagilov RF, Designed RFI, Performed JWC (2008) Defined spatial structure stabilizes a synthetic multispecies bacterial community. PNAS 105:18188–18193. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807935105
Kron P, Suda J, Husband BC (2007) Applications of flow cytometry to evolutionary and population biology. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:847–876. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095504
Lee S, Lim WA, Thorn KS (2013) Improved blue, green, and red fluorescent protein tagging vectors for S. cerevisiae. PLoS One 8:e67902. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067902
Lin-Cereghino J, Wong WW, Xiong S, Giang W, Luong LT, Vu J, Johnson SD, Lin-Cereghino GP (2005) Condensed protocol for competent cell preparation and transformation of the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Biotechniques 38:44–48. https://doi.org/10.2144/05381BM04
Little AEF, Robinson CJ, Peterson SB, Raffa KF, Handelsman J (2008) Rules of engagement: interspecies interactions that regulate microbial communities. Annu Rev Microbiol 62:375–401. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.030608.101423
Mattanovich D, Borth N (2006) Applications of cell sorting in biotechnology. Microb Cell Factories 5:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-5-12
Melin P (2004) Proteomics as a tool to study microbial interactions. Curr Proteomics 1:27–34. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570164043488261
Momeni B, Brileya KA, Fields MW, Shou W (2013) Strong inter-population cooperation leads to partner intermixing in microbial communities. Elife 2013:e00230. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00230
Morrison-Whittle P, Lee SA, Fedrizzi B, Goddard MR (2018) Co-evolution as tool for diversifying flavor and aroma profiles of wines. Front Microbiol 9:910. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00910
Nandy SK, Srivastava RK (2018) A review on sustainable yeast biotechnological processes and applications. Microbiol Res 207:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2017.11.013
Peng C, Andersen B, Arshid S, Larsen MR, Albergaria H, Lametsch R, Arneborg N (2019) Proteomics insights into the responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during mixed-culture alcoholic fermentation with Lachancea thermotolerans. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 95:fiz126. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiz126
Pérez-Torrado R, Rantsiou K, Perrone B, Navarro-Tapia E, Querol A, Cocolin L (2017) Ecological interactions among Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: insight into the dominance phenomenon. Sci Rep 7:43603. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43603
Petitgonnet C, Klein GL, Roullier-Gall C, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Quintanilla-Casas B, Vichi S, Julien-David D, Alexandre H (2019) Influence of cell-cell contact between L. thermotolerans and S. cerevisiae on yeast interactions and the exo-metabolome. Food Microbiol 83:122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.05.005
Pinilla-Redondo R, Riber L, Sørensen SJ (2018) Fluorescence recovery allows the implementation of a fluorescence reporter gene platform applicable for the detection and quantification of horizontal gene transfer in anoxic environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e02507–e02517. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02507-17
Props R, Monsieurs P, Mysara M, Clement L, Boon N (2016) Measuring the biodiversity of microbial communities by flow cytometry. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1376–1385. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12607
Ransom EM, Williams KB, Weiss DS, Ellermeier CD (2014) Identification and characterization of a gene cluster required for proper rod shape, cell division, and pathogenesis in Clostridium difficile. J Bacteriol 196:2290–2300. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00038-14
Roederer M (2002) Compensation in flow cytometry. Curr Protoc Cytom 22:1.14.1–1.14.20. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142956.cy0114s22
Rossouw D, Meiring SP, Bauer FF (2018) Modifying Saccharomyces cerevisiae adhesion properties regulates yeast ecosystem dynamics. mSphere 14:e00383–e00318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(98)80006-1
Said SB, Or D (2017) Synthetic microbial ecology: engineering habitats for modular consortia. Front Microbiol 8:1125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01125
Sanchez A, Gore J (2013) Feedback between population and evolutionary dynamics determines the fate of social microbial populations. PLoS Biol 11:e1001547. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001547
Sheff MA, Thorn KS (2004) Optimized cassettes for fluorescent protein tagging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 21:661–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1130
Shekhawat K, Patterton H, Bauer FF, Setati ME (2019) RNA-seq based transcriptional analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lachancea thermotolerans in mixed-culture fermentations under anaerobic conditions. BMC Genomics 20:145. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5511-x
Song H, Ding MZ, Jia XQ, Ma Q, Yuan YJ (2014) Synthetic microbial consortia: from systematic analysis to construction and applications. Chem Soc Rev 43:6954–6981. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00114a
Vembadi A, Menachery A, Qasaimeh MA (2019) Cell cytometry: review and perspective on biotechnological advances. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 7:147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00147
Venturelli OS, Carr AC, Fisher G, Hsu RH, Lau R, Bowen BP, Hromada S, Northen T, Arkin AP (2018) Deciphering microbial interactions in synthetic human gut microbiome communities. Mol Syst Biol 14:e8157. https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20178157
Vigentini I, Gebbia M, Belotti A, Foschino R, Roth FP (2017) CRISPR/Cas9 system as a valuable genome editing tool for wine yeasts with application to decrease urea production. Front Microbiol 8:2194. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02194
Virtanen M, Hattula ML, Arstila AU (2010) Artificial tripartite symbiosis involving a green alga (Chlamydomonas), a bacterium (Azotobacter) and a fungus (Alternaria): morphological and physiological characterization. Chemosphere 8:431–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(79)90003-1
Wang C, Esteve-Zarzoso B, Mas A (2014) Monitoring of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hanseniaspora uvarum, and Starmerella bacillaris (synonym Candida zemplinina) populations during alcoholic fermentation by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Int J Food Microbiol 191:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.08.014
Weill U, Krieger G, Avihou Z, Milo R, Schuldiner M, Davidi D (2019) Assessment of GFP tag position on protein localization and growth fitness in yeast. J Mol Biol 431:636–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2018.12.004
Zhou N, Katz M, Knecht W, Compagno C, Piškur J (2018) Genome dynamics and evolution in yeasts: a long-term yeast-bacteria competition experiment. PLoS One 13:e0194911. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194911
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the flow cytometry technical assistance of Mrs. Lize Engelbrecht at the fluorescence microscopy unit of the central analytical facility of Stellenbosch University.
Funding
The following funders supported this research: The National Research Foundation of South Africa through Grant number 83471 (SA Research Chair in Integrated Wine Science) to FFB and the Royal Society (Future Leaders - Independent African Researchers (FLAIR)) to DR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DR and FFB initiated the research and conceived and conceptualised the project; CC designed and conducted the experimental work; CC, RNB, DR and FFB analysed and interpreted the data; CC wrote the draft version; and CC, DR, RNB and FFB edited the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with animal or human participants performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 508 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Conacher, C.G., Naidoo-Blassoples, R.K., Rossouw, D. et al. Real-time monitoring of population dynamics and physical interactions in a synthetic yeast ecosystem by use of multicolour flow cytometry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104, 5547–5562 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10607-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10607-x