Abstract
In this study, the advantage of a novel measuring device for the online determination of oxygen and carbon dioxide transfer rates in shaking-flasks is reported for glucose oxidation by Gluconobacter oxydans. In this fermentation process, this device was used for the characterization of the oxidation pattern of different strains. G. oxydans NCIMB 8084 forms 2,5-diketogluconate from d-glucose in a multi-stage process via three different membrane-bound dehydrogenases. This strain was chosen for a scale-up of the process from shaking-flasks to a 2-l stirred vessel. An enhancement of 2,5-diketogluconate production was realized by controlling the pH at different levels during the fermentation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderlei T, Büchs J (2001) Device for sterile online measurement of the oxygen transfer rate in shaking flasks. Biochem Eng J 7:157–163
Anderlei T, Zang W, Büchs J (2002) Online respiration activity measurement (OTR, CTR, RQ) in shake flasks. Biochem Eng J (in press)
Asai T (1968) Acetic acid bacteria—classification and biochemical activities. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo
Beschkov V, Velizarov S, Peeva L (1995) Some kinetic aspects and modeling of biotransformation of d-glucose to keto-d-gluconates. Bioprocess Eng 13:301–305
Buse R, Qazi GN, Träger M, Onken U (1990) Influence of dissolved oxygen tension on the product rate of 2,5-diketogluconic acid by Gluconobacter melanogenum. Biotechnol Lett 12:111–116
Buse R, Onken U, Qazi GN, Sharma N, Parshad R, Verma V (1992) Influence of dilution rate and dissolved oxygen concentration on continuous keto acid production by Gluconobacter oxydans subsp. melanogenum. Enzyme Microb Technol 14:1001–1006
De Ley J, Swings J (1984) Family VI, Acetobacteriaceae. Genus II, Gluconobacter. In: Krieg NR, Holt JG (eds) Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 275–278
Klasen R, Bringer-Meyer S, Sahm H (1995) Biochemical characterization and sequence analysis of the gluconate:NADP 5 oxidoreductase gene from Gluconobacter oxydans. J Bacteriol 177:2637–2643
Levering PR, Weenk G, Olijve W, Dijkhuizen L, Harder W (1988) Regulation of gluconate and ketogluconate production in Gluconobacter oxydans ATCC 621-H. Arch Microbiol 149:534–539
Lusta KA, Reshetilov AN (1998) Physiological and biochemical features of Gluconobacter oxydans and prospects of their use in biotechnology and biosensor systems (a review). Appl Biochem Microbiol 34:307–320
Macauley S, McNeill B, Harvey LM (2001) The genus Gluconobacter and its applications in biotechnology. Crit Rev Biotechnol 21:1–25
Olijve W, Kok JJ (1979) Analysis of Gluconobacter oxydans in glucose-containing media. Arch Microbiol 121:283–290
Perlman D (1954) Spectrophotometric method for the determination of 5-keto-d-gluconic acid. J Bacteriol Chem 215:353–356
Pronk JT, Levering PR, Olijve W, Dijken JP van (1989) Role of NADP-dependent and quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase in gluconic acid production by Gluconobacter oxydans. Enzyme Microb Technol 11:160–164
Qazi GN, Parshad R, Verma V, Chopra CL (1991) Diketo-gluconate fermentation by Gluconobacter oxydans. Enzyme Microb Technol 13:504–507
Stadler-Szöke Á, Nyeste L, Holló J (1980) Studies on the factors affecting gluconic acid and 5-ketogluconic acid formation by Acetobacter. Acta Aliment 9:155–172
Weenk G, Olijve W, Harder W (1984) Ketogluconate formation by Gluconobacter species. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 20:400–405
Acknowledgements
The authors kindly thank Prof. H. Sahm and S. Bringer-Meyer from the Institute of Biotechnology at the Jülich Research Center, Germany, for their support of our work and for providing G. oxydans strain DSM 3503 for this study. The authors ensured that all experiments comply with the current German laws.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silberbach, M., Maier, B., Zimmermann, M. et al. Glucose oxidation by Gluconobacter oxydans: characterization in shaking-flasks, scale-up and optimization of the pH profile. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 62, 92–98 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1222-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1222-x