Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional postmortem ultrasound: feasibility in perinatal death investigation

  • Technical Innovation
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three- and four-dimensional US techniques in antenatal screening are commonplace, but they are not routinely used for perinatal postmortem US. In this technical innovation, we performed both two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) postmortem US on 11 foetuses (mean gestation: 23 weeks; range: 15–32 weeks) to determine whether there was any benefit in 3-D over conventional 2-D methods. In one case of osteogenesis imperfecta, both 2-D and 3-D US images were non-diagnostic because of small foetal size. Of the remaining 10 foetuses, 7 were normal at imaging and autopsy, and 3 had abnormalities detected on both 2-D and 3-D US. There were no false-positive diagnoses by 2-D or 3-D US. Whilst 3-D postmortem US was a feasible technique, it did not provide additional information over 2-D US. Routine 3-D postmortem US cannot therefore be routinely recommended based on our findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shelmerdine SC, Sebire NJ, Arthurs OJ (2019) Perinatal post mortem ultrasound (PMUS): a practical approach. Insights Imaging 10:35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shelmerdine S, Langan D, Sebire NJ, Arthurs O (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of perinatal post-mortem ultrasound (PMUS): a systematic review. BMJ Paediatr Open 3:e000566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Prodhomme O, Baud C, Saguintaah M et al (2015) Comparison of postmortem ultrasound and X-ray with autopsy in fetal death: retrospective study of 169 cases. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 3:120–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Votino C, Cos Sanchez T, Bessieres B et al (2018) Minimally invasive fetal autopsy using ultrasound: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 52:776–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shelmerdine SC, Sebire NJ, Arthurs OJ (2019) Perinatal post-mortem ultrasound (PMUS): radiological–pathological correlation. Insights into imaging 10:81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. The Royal College of Pathologists (2017) Guidelines on autopsy practice: fetal autopsy (2nd trimester fetal loss and termination of pregnancy for congenital anomaly). Online document. https://www.rcpath.org/uploads/assets/b20ea503-7799-433c-99160653762f896c/Fetal-autopsy-2nd-trimester-fetal-loss-and-termination-of-pregnancy-for-congenital-anomaly.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2020

  7. The Royal College of Pathologists (2017) Guidelines on autopsy practice: third trimester antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth. Online document. https://www.rcpath.org/uploads/assets/0e55a233-5fe6-4965-b85f4fa7c9971742/Guidelines-on-autopsy-practice-Third-trimester-antepartum-and-intrapartum-stillbirth.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2020

  8. Hutchinson JC, Shelmerdine SC, Lewis C et al (2019) Minimally invasive perinatal and pediatric autopsy with laparoscopically assisted tissue sampling: feasibility and experience of the MinImAL procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 54:661–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Norman W, Jawad N, Jones R et al (2016) Perinatal and paediatric post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR): sequences and technique. Br J Radiol 89:20151028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Merz E, Welter C (2005) 2D and 3D ultrasound in the evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal anatomy in the second and third trimesters in a level III center. Ultraschall Med 26:9–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu HX, Zhang QP, Lu MD, Xiao XT (2002) Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional sonography in evaluating fetal malformations. J Clin Ultrasound 30:515–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Y, Tao GW, Pan MZ, Shao GR (2018) Comparison of traditional 2D and 3D Omniview technique in detection of fetus corpus callosum. Med Ultrason 20:493–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang C, Zhao B, Lv S et al (2019) Smart-planes fetal heart (S-planes FH) software to quantitative [sic] evaluate the fetal great arteries. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1651279

  14. Karmegaraj B, Kumar S, Srimurugan B et al (2020) 3D/4D spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) fetal echocardiography provides incremental benefit in predicting the postnatal surgical approach in double outlet right ventricle. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.21988

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Society of Paediatric Radiology 2017 Guy Sebag Research Grant. Dr. Susan C. Shelmerdine is supported by a RCUK/UKRI Innovation Fellowship and Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Research Training Fellowship (Grant Ref: MR/R002118/1). This award is jointly funded by the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR). Dr. Owen J. Arthurs is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Career Development Fellowship (NIHR-CDF-2017-10-037). This article presents independent research funded by the MRC, RCR and NIHR and the views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, MRC, RCR, the NIHR or the Department of Health & Social Care.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan C. Shelmerdine.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shelmerdine, S.C., Sebire, N.J. & Arthurs, O.J. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional postmortem ultrasound: feasibility in perinatal death investigation. Pediatr Radiol 51, 1259–1266 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04934-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04934-4

Keywords

Navigation